Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Explain the MD321 turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 January 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #1  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default Explain the MD321 turbo?

Over the past year or so I've noticed a lot of threads talking about these MD321's and from the sound of things, they are the do anything, go anywhere turbo. What's so good about them that's so different from other turbos like TDs, VFs, GTs etc? I'd always assumed that a 'big' turbo gives big boost at the expense of spool point and/or lag, and a small turbo gives better response at the expense of top end power. In other words, like anything else in automotive tuning, there's no such thing as a free lunch. Obviously there are hybrids which mix and match cold and hot side components to try to improve characteristics but there is a limit to what you can do.

So what's so great about the MD321 that has never been seen before? It seems to do everything - big boost, low spool up point, low lag, full airflow to the redline etc. If this is really the case, how does it do it, what's the technology, is what I'm saying really?
Old 01 January 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #2  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

The MD321 is a VF/GT30 hybrid , it's exact specs are regarded as secret and there are a few variations...
In essence you can buy alternatives that will give you similar results and again there are variations on all of these..
Old 01 January 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #3  
911's Avatar
911
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 1
Default

A good question to ask on 22B?

They cost a lot more than a 20g so I presume there are lots of 'adjusted' parts in there that are hand fettled.
Old 01 January 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
turboDean's Avatar
turboDean
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
From: South Wales, Scoobless, Type R is gone!
Default

I've wondered this as well, what makes the MD321 series so good?

In reality are they any better than the other Garret Hybird's on the market by the likes of RCMS and Scoobyclinic??
Old 01 January 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Default

I hav had mine for 2 month now , on my builts 2.5 it is awesome , spool quicker than the vf34 that i had on my 2.0 before , make much more power /torque(460-480/same).
its a MD321T
highly reccommended
Old 01 January 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #6  
RLE's Avatar
RLE
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: West Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by 911
A good question to ask on 22B?
Chuckled when I saw this thread as I've been thinking about upgrading my current 18G turbo to the MD321 for a few weeks now. As Graham says 22B is a good source of info regarding this very subject but I've not found it conclusive by any means. A lot of the associated threads seem geared towards 2.5 engines and the like so I'm still unsure whether it would be worth the outlay on my 2.0.

Will keep my eyes on this thread!
Old 01 January 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #7  
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 27
From: Cheshire
Wink

My MD321T was awesome with my 2.35... Good turbo that bolts in standard position...
Old 01 January 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #8  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Questions for Bighead

At what Revs does it make 1bar of boost?
At what Revs does it make full boost?
What revs does it hit max torque?

I have a 2.5 20g and would like to know if your setup equals or betters the boost and torque targets for revs

Andy
Old 01 January 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #9  
The Fixer's Avatar
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Questions for Bighead

At what Revs does it make 1bar of boost?
At what Revs does it make full boost?
What revs does it hit max torque?

I have a 2.5 20g and would like to know if your setup equals or betters the boost and torque targets for revs

Andy

Plenty of info on 22B, comparisons against 20G's etc
Old 01 January 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #10  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Cheers I'll have a look.
Old 01 January 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #11  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by andy97
Questions for Bighead

At what Revs does it make 1bar of boost?
At what Revs does it make full boost?
What revs does it hit max torque?

I have a 2.5 20g and would like to know if your setup equals or betters the boost and torque targets for revs

Andy
Andy ....believe me the MD will out perform the 20g at every departments
regarding yr question ...its all depends on the mapper , I can tell you that I run out of gears to change .......I can pull 6th gear at under 2000 rpm !

Had the APS SR40 turbo on my 2.0(before my 2.5/Md321T), imho the MD is a much better turbo costing a few hundreds notes less
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by RLE
Chuckled when I saw this thread as I've been thinking about upgrading my current 18G turbo to the MD321 for a few weeks now. As Graham says 22B is a good source of info regarding this very subject but I've not found it conclusive by any means. A lot of the associated threads seem geared towards 2.5 engines and the like so I'm still unsure whether it would be worth the outlay on my 2.0.

Will keep my eyes on this thread!
you need the MD321H for yr 2.0(MD321T is better on spool up on the 2.5)
the "H" model will be as quick (if not quicker)than a VF34 on a 2 litre, but it will make 400bhp wheres the VF will only do 340-360 bhp !
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #13  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

So in essence the 'T' variant is nicely suited to the 2.5, whereas the 'H' is better for the 2.0. No wonder it's getting popular if it can make 400 in the standard position and spool up like a smallish VF.

Regarding the 'secret' formula, surely all one needs to do is look at the compressor and turbine housings and take them apart to see what the crack is? Or ring up Turbo Dynamics?
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #14  
The Fixer's Avatar
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
So in essence the 'T' variant is nicely suited to the 2.5, whereas the 'H' is better for the 2.0. No wonder it's getting popular if it can make 400 in the standard position and spool up like a smallish VF.

Regarding the 'secret' formula, surely all one needs to do is look at the compressor and turbine housings and take them apart to see what the crack is? Or ring up Turbo Dynamics?
They wont tell you, They are Lateral Performance designed turbos built by Turbo Dynamics, alot of effort went into there design (still ongoing)... just buy it and be happy
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #15  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
So in essence the 'T' variant is nicely suited to the 2.5, whereas the 'H' is better for the 2.0. No wonder it's getting popular if it can make 400 in the standard position and spool up like a smallish VF.

Regarding the 'secret' formula, surely all one needs to do is look at the compressor and turbine housings and take them apart to see what the crack is? Or ring up Turbo Dynamics?
Silent you've got in in one there
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #16  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Talking

Originally Posted by Conrad_Bradley
They wont tell you, They are Lateral Performance designed turbos built by Turbo Dynamics, alot of effort went into there design (still ongoing)... just buy it and be happy
Hello Conrad....Happy new year

sry to hear you've sold TheRacingLine ......
Old 01 January 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #17  
STiFreak's Avatar
STiFreak
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
So in essence the 'T' variant is nicely suited to the 2.5, whereas the 'H' is better for the 2.0. No wonder it's getting popular if it can make 400 in the standard position and spool up like a smallish VF.

Regarding the 'secret' formula, surely all one needs to do is look at the compressor and turbine housings and take them apart to see what the crack is? Or ring up Turbo Dynamics?
I believe the T is pretty good on a newage with AVCS heads and even better if it is a built 2.0l

The spool / response will always be better on a 2.35 or 2.5 for the MD321T.

If you are looking for best spool and are not as worried about top end figures, the 321H is probably best.

Would be great to get Bob Rawle's comments on this, as he has mapped quite a few MD321T and H's. (added: or Andy F for that matter)

Not sure of the secret formula though.

Last edited by STiFreak; 01 January 2008 at 10:10 PM.
Old 01 January 2008 | 10:54 PM
  #18  
terryb's Avatar
terryb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
From: in motoring nirvana.....
Default

A 321T ona built 2 litre engine is phenomenal. With the 2 litre's high revving nature, the turbo just keeps on boosting all the way up to the red line. i had 2 bar at 8k revs - awesome. On race fuel it made 504bhp and 486lbft on my 2 litre - Nice
Old 01 January 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #19  
scoobyDAZZA's Avatar
scoobyDAZZA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
From: devon
Default

Originally Posted by STiFreak

Would be great to get Bob Rawle's comments on this, as he has mapped quite a few MD321T and H's.


mine being 1 of them
Old 02 January 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #20  
STiFreak's Avatar
STiFreak
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyDAZZA
mine being 1 of them
Well don't keep us in suspense then mate!
Old 02 January 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #21  
The Fixer's Avatar
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bighead
Hello Conrad....Happy new year

sry to hear you've sold TheRacingLine ......
Mike, thanks, Same to you, hope your well! Time to move on, its in good hands though

Back on topic....

I believe Andy F has( or had) a 321T on his road car
Old 02 January 2008 | 01:06 AM
  #22  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

I love the comment about it being a bolt on - it wasnt on my sti5 - had to angle grind off some metal on the car first for it to sit flush (well Dave Harries did for me :-) )

Its laggy on a 2 litre but once it kicks in then feel the boost rush. I prefer the lag - makes for an interesting time on the straights at places like Coombe, Donny and Snetterton - cars dont know whats hit them when you just go flying past

Having had the 20g previously and mapped on race fuel you cannot compare at all - the 20g is much smaller and far less powerful - depends what you want. You pay more for a more powerful Turbo. The 321T is more laggy than the 20g on a 2litre - quite a bit so

You'd probably be looking at a 321T on an engine you've gone Internal on whereas the 20g is an ideal compliment on a std (400bhp is standard to me) sti where you only want say 370-400bhp tops

Whats the difference between the 321S and 321T (is it the exhaust housing size?)
Old 02 January 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #23  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

I don't think you can compare a 321T to a 20g as said above.

However comparing a 321H to a 20g is far more interesting, especially if you have a 16g waiting to be converted... is a £1300 321H value over a converted 20g costing £550?
Old 02 January 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #24  
WRXshaneWRX's Avatar
WRXshaneWRX
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

ive got a T on my 2ltr, runs at just over 420bhp on road fuel !!!

yer there is a bit of lag then then "bloody hell" any distance someone has made on u in that second you waited for boost is gone in a blink, while you woooossshhh past um!
Old 02 January 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #25  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Steve,

You had an earlier version of the turbo (S?) which whilst giving good power, was much laggier than the H, & T.

With regard to fitting, the MD321 series do fit in the standard location, using the standard fit up, & down pipes, but due to the increased size of the compressor housing, there's a small redundant lug that needs removing from the engine bell housing, which only takes a few minutes to do.

As for how well they work, I think the owners give the best descriptions.


Mark.


Originally Posted by Fangoria
I love the comment about it being a bolt on - it wasnt on my sti5 - had to angle grind off some metal on the car first for it to sit flush (well Dave Harries did for me :-) )

Its laggy on a 2 litre but once it kicks in then feel the boost rush. I prefer the lag - makes for an interesting time on the straights at places like Coombe, Donny and Snetterton - cars dont know whats hit them when you just go flying past

Having had the 20g previously and mapped on race fuel you cannot compare at all - the 20g is much smaller and far less powerful - depends what you want. You pay more for a more powerful Turbo. The 321T is more laggy than the 20g on a 2litre - quite a bit so

You'd probably be looking at a 321T on an engine you've gone Internal on whereas the 20g is an ideal compliment on a std (400bhp is standard to me) sti where you only want say 370-400bhp tops

Whats the difference between the 321S and 321T (is it the exhaust housing size?)
Old 02 January 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #26  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

Your right- it took a minute or so to get rid of the metal in the way

Re earlier discussions - my memories going.......

If the T is less laggy then this is an obvious choice for most - as you have the potential later on if you want to run more boost - really then is a no-brainer

T would then be a nice compromise for someone on their way to decent power (over 400bhp) which the 20g struggles to achieve on road fuel
Old 02 January 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #27  
911's Avatar
911
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 1
Default

About 4 or 5 months ago there was a great discussion on the 20g verses...MD series with lots of facts etc.
Engine Ancilaries iirc.

For the money, the 20g is still here, but for the 'best' it has to be the expensive MD. 2 for sale already secondhand!
Old 02 January 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #28  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

The search function though is near on useless since it was changed over a year ago - now I can understand why people repost as trying to do a search on a previous post can be a waste of time

I'll have another look for that Thread - I'm sure it was more than 4-5 months ago
Old 02 January 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #29  
scoobyDAZZA's Avatar
scoobyDAZZA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
From: devon
Default

lag ? what lag











oh , i've got a 2.5

awesome turbo , instant kick on an ej257 .
spools alot faster than a vf34 on a 2.0 litre (old set-up)
Old 02 January 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #30  
_Meridian_'s Avatar
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Mancs
Default

Might as well post this again:



Second line is torque, not boost, but follows the boost curve pretty well.


MD321H on a standard 02 STI 2 litre. Only running 1.4 bar boost though, hence the relatively low figures. It's running 1.75 bar boost now, but I've not been able to get it on a rolling road since the new boost controller was added.


M



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.