chargecooler
#3
Scooby Regular
#4
![Smile](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon7.gif)
![Wink](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Fitting a RS Legacy air/water chargecooler to a WRX
Thanks
Gavin
Last edited by GavinP; 07 March 2009 at 06:02 PM.
#6
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ive got all the bits from a legacy chargecooler i was going to fit to my wrx but have never got around to it,i have measured inlet temps and moving the temps havent got higher than 35/40 degrees c, staionary howver,touches 70 easy with heatsoak !
#7
Scooby Regular
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I guess probably the easiest way to summarise it is that to me there are two advantages to a chargecooler system: 1 - it makes light work of plumbing/routing problems in a tight engine bay and you can have the boost circuit as short as in the original Subaru TMIC layout, which is a major advantage. All you need to do is run a couple of narrow water pipes down to the cc rad at the front. 2 - there is a lot more heatsink potential in a chargecooler system - it takes ages to get any significant heat into it at all under the most arduous of conditions and it evens out temp spikes in a way that no intercooler can. Downside of this is that it takes a while to get the heat out of the system at all, although if it's doing its job properly the system should never get near as hot as an intercooler system would in places.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is an old article here where the different top mount intercoolers are compared and the Legacy chargecooler does pretty well:
Autospeed article
The real eye opener in that article however is how bad the turbo to intercooler pipe is for most of the factory units![EEK!](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Part 1 of the article is here
Thanks
Gavin
Autospeed article
The real eye opener in that article however is how bad the turbo to intercooler pipe is for most of the factory units
![EEK!](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Part 1 of the article is here
Thanks
Gavin
Last edited by GavinP; 08 March 2009 at 12:19 PM.
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North East Subaru Forum
Posts: 3,920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The question was is a charge cooler better than a front mounted intercooler!
All charge coolers use a standard top mounted intercooler size heat exchanger that is easily overpowered by by the heat of the charge going through it in turn not cooling the air.
A front mount has enough surface area to cool the air due to the size of the core.
In my opinion a charge cooler in no better than a top mounted intercooler.
All charge coolers use a standard top mounted intercooler size heat exchanger that is easily overpowered by by the heat of the charge going through it in turn not cooling the air.
A front mount has enough surface area to cool the air due to the size of the core.
In my opinion a charge cooler in no better than a top mounted intercooler.
#11
![Smile](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon7.gif)
![Smile](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The Complete Guide to Intercooling - Part 2
#12
Scooby Regular
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The question was is a charge cooler better than a front mounted intercooler!
All charge coolers use a standard top mounted intercooler size heat exchanger that is easily overpowered by by the heat of the charge going through it in turn not cooling the air.
A front mount has enough surface area to cool the air due to the size of the core.
In my opinion a charge cooler in no better than a top mounted intercooler.
All charge coolers use a standard top mounted intercooler size heat exchanger that is easily overpowered by by the heat of the charge going through it in turn not cooling the air.
A front mount has enough surface area to cool the air due to the size of the core.
In my opinion a charge cooler in no better than a top mounted intercooler.
#14
![Smile](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon7.gif)
Firstly I would recommend measuring your intake air temperature to see if you need to upgrade your intercooler.
If an upgrade is required, the decison would come down to your other modifications, what type of driving do you do/average speed, how much time is spent on boost and if you do trackdays.
Speaking in very general terms, a good air/water unit works VERY effectively if you spend relatively small amounts of time on boost (which allows the water to cool down between periods of boost) but if you spend a lot of time on boost (i.e. do trackdays), a good air/air intercooler is a better choice.
Thanks
Gavin
If an upgrade is required, the decison would come down to your other modifications, what type of driving do you do/average speed, how much time is spent on boost and if you do trackdays.
Speaking in very general terms, a good air/water unit works VERY effectively if you spend relatively small amounts of time on boost (which allows the water to cool down between periods of boost) but if you spend a lot of time on boost (i.e. do trackdays), a good air/air intercooler is a better choice.
Thanks
Gavin
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post