Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

VF35 Maximum boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 June 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
Stealth's Avatar
Stealth
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default VF35 Maximum boost?

Hi All,

I have an STI7 and to be fair I'm getting a little bored of the power, she currently has the TSL 333 upgrade on her (so exhaust, panel and ECUTek remap) but it's now not enough.

Is it feasable to get the car remapped again using the exsisting kit or should I change my Turbo and injectors and then remap?

The remap runs the car at 1.3bar, the injectors are at 75% on full chat and the advance multiplier is as good as it gets.

Is there room for improvement using what I have and just have a remap? I just don't want to run big boost through the VF35 if it is going to blow it to pieces

thanks

Tony

Last edited by Stealth; 15 June 2009 at 12:58 PM.
Old 15 June 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #2  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

You'll be approaching a level where the VF35 doesn't have much more to give I'd imagine. For the best gains. You'd be looking at a bigger turbo. 18G would be nice on an STi

Have a word with someone like David at APi, but get ready to open your wallet!

Ns04
Old 15 June 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #3  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

yeah i think ns is right, turbos prob about giving its bollox. new turbo will be needed to get yu higher
Old 15 June 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #4  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

my friend has a sti8 running a vf35 turbo, he has full decat, headers and a performance air filter. with his remap he is running 1.4 bar of boost and is pretty much maxed out.
hope it helps.

as above if you want more get your wallet out, it's all about limits of each component, ie turbo, injectors, intercooler, clutch.

you still have a quick car remember your spool up is fantastic.

Last edited by TingTongPJ; 15 June 2009 at 03:23 PM.
Old 15 June 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
Stealth's Avatar
Stealth
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

Dag nam it, right then VF35 going up for sale soon with some 550 injectors LOL

cheers for the replies
Old 15 June 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #6  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Very popular up-grade for the WRX crowd, price high as there are few about atm.

Helps pay for the bigger one you'll need !

dunx
Old 15 June 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #7  
sy.'s Avatar
sy.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: west mids
Default

squeezing 1.55 bar out of my vf35 running 342/328 but they dont last that long working this hard remember td turbo's are stronger!!
Old 15 June 2009 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Originally Posted by Stealth
Dag nam it, right then VF35 going up for sale soon with some 550 injectors LOL

cheers for the replies
I'd keep the 550s mate; they should be man enough for an 18G. You don't want injectors too large for your power aspirations as they can cause issues when it comes to mapping.

Ns04
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #9  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

my vf35 was mapped with with 1.36 bar using 440 injectors,is that about right or has the mapping been done too far in the safety margin? could i not have had it mapped with 1.4 bar? it made 298bhp and 303lb ft,so was i losing a bit of power cause mapper didnt run enough boost?
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #10  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

depends a lot on the individual car.. the Sti newage tends to come alive at a certain boost level whcih varies between 1.4 and 1.5bar deopending on the car.
If you went to tubular headers and had a remap you should see a little more power and torque.

99greenwagon,

the 440cc injectors would mostlikely be the reason it was stopped at 1.36bar as they are probablly pretty maxxed at that. Also the newage sti heads have vvt which works very well and will allow more power on the same turbo as the 99 etc

Simon
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #11  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
depends a lot on the individual car.. the Sti newage tends to come alive at a certain boost level whcih varies between 1.4 and 1.5bar deopending on the car.
If you went to tubular headers and had a remap you should see a little more power and torque.

99greenwagon,

the 440cc injectors would mostlikely be the reason it was stopped at 1.36bar as they are probablly pretty maxxed at that. Also the newage sti heads have vvt which works very well and will allow more power on the same turbo as the 99 etc

Simon
so would i benefit from 550s and a tweek?
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #12  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

small amount yes.. would be worth adding headers or other stuff to make the most of the tweak though, are you still on tmic or fmic?

Simon
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #13  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
small amount yes.. would be worth adding headers or other stuff to make the most of the tweak though, are you still on tmic or fmic?

Simon
sti 5 top mount
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #14  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,061
Likes: 82
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by New_scooby_04
I'd keep the 550s mate; they should be man enough for an 18G. You don't want injectors too large for your power aspirations as they can cause issues when it comes to mapping.

Ns04
I have to completely disagree with that statement. I had 740cc injectors on a forged 2.0L with a VF28 (intention was to eventually get a bigger turbo). It was mapped my Andrew Carr on a Power FC. It did almost 30K miles like this and economy was better than it was with the 440's it idled incredibly well and was very very driveable. Infact they were better all round than the 440's

It's not the size of the injectors it's the quality of the mapping.
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon
sti 5 top mount
so 1.36bar, sti tmic and 440cc injectors sounds perfect.
Some tend to peak and tail off and so you can run more at that peak because the heat higher up the rpm range will be less due to the boost tailing off.. some hold the boost well and it can get a bit hot with tmic and it is wise to keep fuelling slightly richer on tmic hence the reason whom ever mapped it probably stopped at 1.36bar, also depends on how much ignition advance the engine takes during mapping you can judge how well the setup is coping with heat from turbo charger and amount of boost etc etc..
It is easy to get caught up in peak power and peak boost figures when the whole thing should have been assessed for you individual set up when mapped etc

Simon
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #16  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
I have to completely disagree with that statement. I had 740cc injectors on a forged 2.0L with a VF28 (intention was to eventually get a bigger turbo). It was mapped my Andrew Carr on a Power FC. It did almost 30K miles like this and economy was better than it was with the 440's it idled incredibly well and was very very driveable. Infact they were better all round than the 440's

It's not the size of the injectors it's the quality of the mapping.

That'll probably be the ECU then Daz, Power FC probably lets the mapper do more with the fueling (greater resolution?) than Ecutek with JECS

VF35 running 330bhp on 550s. mapped with Ecutek slight lumpiness on low throttle as the turbo wound up.

Mapped by the Guru, so no issue with mapping.

Both Bob and David at APi said there is only so much you can do with larger injectors than necessary for power level on the JECs ECU.

Simtek installed: problem sorted!

Last edited by New_scooby_04; 15 June 2009 at 09:47 PM.
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
so 1.36bar, sti tmic and 440cc injectors sounds perfect.
Some tend to peak and tail off and so you can run more at that peak because the heat higher up the rpm range will be less due to the boost tailing off.. some hold the boost well and it can get a bit hot with tmic and it is wise to keep fuelling slightly richer on tmic hence the reason whom ever mapped it probably stopped at 1.36bar, also depends on how much ignition advance the engine takes during mapping you can judge how well the setup is coping with heat from turbo charger and amount of boost etc etc..
It is easy to get caught up in peak power and peak boost figures when the whole thing should have been assessed for you individual set up when mapped etc

Simon
thing is,would the cost with headers 550s etc and map tweek justify the extra power/torque? if its only another 10bhp etc i dont think it does justify?
Old 15 June 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #18  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon
thing is,would the cost with headers 550s etc and map tweek justify the extra power/torque? if its only another 10bhp etc i dont think it does justify?
possibly not no.. if you added a fmic too you would see more but again more expence v power etc..
Old 15 June 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #19  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
possibly not no.. if you added a fmic too you would see more but again more expence v power etc..
thankyou for the info, stay as i am for a while till the novelty wears off lol,sorry for the slight thred hijack!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM
psport
Subaru Parts
3
04 October 2015 08:35 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 10:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
01 October 2015 05:30 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.