Type R or P1
#1
Type R or P1
Hey everyone, i have been looking at the type R ( 2 door ) around 1997. However ive also seen the price of the P1 come down a bit and is the P1 worth the extra cash?
Ive read a few times people saying they prefer the type R and others saying the P1. Also read that the P1 is more a road / everyday car where as the type R is more a track car ??
Finally what do you think is better ? Im looking for something rare ( dont think i have seen either in person or if i have its not been often and i dont think the type R is a limited edition - might be though ?? ). Also the car will only be used on the track. I will also be interested in modding it quite heavily.
What you think ?
Ive read a few times people saying they prefer the type R and others saying the P1. Also read that the P1 is more a road / everyday car where as the type R is more a track car ??
Finally what do you think is better ? Im looking for something rare ( dont think i have seen either in person or if i have its not been often and i dont think the type R is a limited edition - might be though ?? ). Also the car will only be used on the track. I will also be interested in modding it quite heavily.
What you think ?
Trending Topics
#11
so theres not that many diffrences between the P1 and type R then ? If the P1 doesnt have the likes of dccd - not sure exactly what it does but its there anyways would the type r not be the better option anyways ? Whats the power output standard ? both 280 bhp yeah ? So is the type R an offical limited edition along with the P1 and 22b or was there loads of type R's made and ive just not seen any/many?
#12
im a type r man myself. if its just going to be a track car i would of thought the r shell would be a lighter car to start with, because the import wont have all the underseal and sound dedening (could be wrong). the p1 will hold its money in years to come tho.
#13
the type r is basically a jap import, prodrive took 1000 of these worked there magic and then they were sold as a uk car, im not sure how many type r's there are but they werent a limited run like the p1.
if i was gonna be doing track work id rather duff up a type r over a p1, yeah power is the same
dccd- driver controlled center diff- means you can play with where the power goes a little bit
if i was gonna be doing track work id rather duff up a type r over a p1, yeah power is the same
dccd- driver controlled center diff- means you can play with where the power goes a little bit
#14
So with the dccd can you have 4wd, fwd or rwd ? or is it not as simple as that.
So the type R would be the best bet 100% - cheaper to start with also.
It will be used only on the track or once in a while maybe the drag strip but mainly track use so the interior will be coming out then roll cage added in mods to engine, diffrent brakes etc, i suppose if you do all that to a p1 id be taking the p1 out of it ? if that makes any sense.
So the type R would be the best bet 100% - cheaper to start with also.
It will be used only on the track or once in a while maybe the drag strip but mainly track use so the interior will be coming out then roll cage added in mods to engine, diffrent brakes etc, i suppose if you do all that to a p1 id be taking the p1 out of it ? if that makes any sense.
#15
quite right mate, p1 is slowly becoming more of a collectors car (nearly), with the change you can buy some goodies for the type r.
the dccd ant quite like that, you do push power from front to back but not by much
the dccd ant quite like that, you do push power from front to back but not by much
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
It will cost you a fortune to make it into a track toy, on the other hand having owned both a Spec C and a type R i can say the spec c is by far the better track car, and for all the money you would throw at a type R to get it near what a Spec C can do out of the box, your better off buying the Spec C (and it will still be quicker )
Tony
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Now do you see why I said forget the idea if you want a track car? you can have a 6 year newer car that does the job you want far better than the type R does (even modified).
Tony
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
This is the ultimate if you want track, to name a few, the quickest Impreza that has done (in standard form) the Nurburgring is an MY05 WRX STI Spec C RA, which did the ring in 7:59.
By the time you have splashed out on a 6k type R and all the other bits your still not going to have the best car out there
400bhp is very achievable on a Spec C, it has everything you need, engine and transmission oil coolers, lightweight, spec c geometry setup, A-DCCD, quick rack steering, 330mm front brembo's and 300mm rear, more agressive engine and ecu setup etc. Pics below.
Litchfield Imports : JDM Subaru Impreza ST Spec C Limited
Tony
By the time you have splashed out on a 6k type R and all the other bits your still not going to have the best car out there
400bhp is very achievable on a Spec C, it has everything you need, engine and transmission oil coolers, lightweight, spec c geometry setup, A-DCCD, quick rack steering, 330mm front brembo's and 300mm rear, more agressive engine and ecu setup etc. Pics below.
Litchfield Imports : JDM Subaru Impreza ST Spec C Limited
Tony
#21
Probably engine rebuild, gearbox, brakes etc, when you have finished throwing 10k at it you would have a decent car, trouble is you can get an MY03/04 Spec C for that money, and they are THE best Impreza you can buy for the money
Now do you see why I said forget the idea if you want a track car? you can have a 6 year newer car that does the job you want far better than the type R does (even modified).
Tony
Now do you see why I said forget the idea if you want a track car? you can have a 6 year newer car that does the job you want far better than the type R does (even modified).
Tony
Thing is i like the type R alot better and would be happier with a car that im happy how it looks then gradually increase how it performs ( 0-60 in 4.8 is still pretty good standard ) rather than have a car that i dont like the looks as much just for the bit extra to start with.
#22
best thing to do is service it properly, get a good base to start from.
dont get suckerd in to buying things you dont need or look trick either. if your gonna be doing track work i would stick some good stoppers on before anything else.
all well and good going out buying a spec C, that is if you got the money. as i say id rather be in a type r than a p1/ spec/22b etc etc on track if you start making contact
dont get suckerd in to buying things you dont need or look trick either. if your gonna be doing track work i would stick some good stoppers on before anything else.
all well and good going out buying a spec C, that is if you got the money. as i say id rather be in a type r than a p1/ spec/22b etc etc on track if you start making contact
#24
the spec c would be cheaper in the long run to get what you want from it.
the dccd is witch craft and hard to understand, im led to belive the bugeye onwards has the best dccd as there is controll over front and rear diffs, here is a like that might help
Understanding DCCD - Type-RA.co.uk - Forum for Subaru Impreza WRX Type RA, WRX STi, Spec-C, S202, Type RA-R
the dccd is witch craft and hard to understand, im led to belive the bugeye onwards has the best dccd as there is controll over front and rear diffs, here is a like that might help
Understanding DCCD - Type-RA.co.uk - Forum for Subaru Impreza WRX Type RA, WRX STi, Spec-C, S202, Type RA-R
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Im not sure everyone will agree with that but as ive driven neither i cant agree or disagree on that one .
Thing is i like the type R alot better and would be happier with a car that im happy how it looks then gradually increase how it performs ( 0-60 in 4.8 is still pretty good standard ) rather than have a car that i dont like the looks as much just for the bit extra to start with.
Thing is i like the type R alot better and would be happier with a car that im happy how it looks then gradually increase how it performs ( 0-60 in 4.8 is still pretty good standard ) rather than have a car that i dont like the looks as much just for the bit extra to start with.
Go test drive both, the Spec C will amaze you, the type R wont (and I own a type R and seriously miss my Spec C )
Tony
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Never owned a new age then?
Shame, when the classics are in the garage with another engine failure and the new age isnt (due to the advancements in the engineering, ie baffled sumps etc) come back and say that again
Tony
Shame, when the classics are in the garage with another engine failure and the new age isnt (due to the advancements in the engineering, ie baffled sumps etc) come back and say that again
Tony
#28
best thing to do is service it properly, get a good base to start from.
dont get suckerd in to buying things you dont need or look trick either. if your gonna be doing track work i would stick some good stoppers on before anything else.
all well and good going out buying a spec C, that is if you got the money. as i say id rather be in a type r than a p1/ spec/22b etc etc on track if you start making contact
dont get suckerd in to buying things you dont need or look trick either. if your gonna be doing track work i would stick some good stoppers on before anything else.
all well and good going out buying a spec C, that is if you got the money. as i say id rather be in a type r than a p1/ spec/22b etc etc on track if you start making contact
Just out of intrest ( this is me going into one of my silly ideas )
3.6-liter 6-cylinder subaru boxer Engine - Engine Displacement | Subaru Boxer Engine
Would that fit in ? Or would it be far to much work and id be better of with a stroker ? 2.5 ?
#30
Yeah need to make sure the thing stops
Just out of intrest ( this is me going into one of my silly ideas )
3.6-liter 6-cylinder subaru boxer Engine - Engine Displacement | Subaru Boxer Engine
Would that fit in ? Or would it be far to much work and id be better of with a stroker ? 2.5 ?
Just out of intrest ( this is me going into one of my silly ideas )
3.6-liter 6-cylinder subaru boxer Engine - Engine Displacement | Subaru Boxer Engine
Would that fit in ? Or would it be far to much work and id be better of with a stroker ? 2.5 ?
wouldnt go there mate, just enjoy it to begin with, for track use id stick with 2.0, but that just my opinion