100 miles out of a full tank :O is that normal !!!
#1
100 miles out of a full tank :O is that normal !!!
Hi guys, i haf full tanked my impreza, and it returned 96 miles, is this noirmal for a subaru, i have a full decat axhaust system, chiped ecu, hks induction kit and thats it.
could it be my fuel pump need changing, as when i put my foot down, it feels like it hold back for 2 secs and then spits the fuel like a fireball and den Woooosh of i go, and also i then smell fuel, could it be my fuel pump playing up, and could this be the reson why im geting such terrible miles outa full tank of v power.
Thanks guys
could it be my fuel pump need changing, as when i put my foot down, it feels like it hold back for 2 secs and then spits the fuel like a fireball and den Woooosh of i go, and also i then smell fuel, could it be my fuel pump playing up, and could this be the reson why im geting such terrible miles outa full tank of v power.
Thanks guys
#7
my bugeye did 90 miles to £25 no remap but had full de-cat and walbro pump and kn filter. running unleaded
and on the same note my first bugeye did about the same with similar mods but no walbro
and on the same note my first bugeye did about the same with similar mods but no walbro
Last edited by Modifications; 26 January 2010 at 10:24 PM.
Trending Topics
#11
Hi Mate,
I would say that's not normal. But...
When I bought by Scooby I managed to get 90 out of a full tank, but I literally caned it everywhere I went on purpose to see how much I could scare myself and that was with no mods.
After that, wooow I thought, perhaps I should have stayed with my 4 litre Jag for environmental / economy reasons
Since then I calmed it down, quickly, I get around 225 out of my WRX around town in lots of traffic jams and 250+ on a run.
So me thinks you have problems with your car.
Hopefully someone else's advice will help you sort it.
Nick.
I would say that's not normal. But...
When I bought by Scooby I managed to get 90 out of a full tank, but I literally caned it everywhere I went on purpose to see how much I could scare myself and that was with no mods.
After that, wooow I thought, perhaps I should have stayed with my 4 litre Jag for environmental / economy reasons
Since then I calmed it down, quickly, I get around 225 out of my WRX around town in lots of traffic jams and 250+ on a run.
So me thinks you have problems with your car.
Hopefully someone else's advice will help you sort it.
Nick.
#13
hi guys, when garage was fiting decat, they cut of the lambda sensor saying that it dont need it, car was driving great, reali responsive, but realy heavy on fuel, even when driving nicely, its very heavy on fuel, and now, car has just died out, its become a big fat slug , any ideas what it could be, and i only smell fuel when i hammer it
#15
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
hi guys, when garage was fiting decat, they cut of the lambda sensor saying that it dont need it, car was driving great, reali responsive, but realy heavy on fuel, even when driving nicely, its very heavy on fuel, and now, car has just died out, its become a big fat slug , any ideas what it could be, and i only smell fuel when i hammer it
Did they use a Samurai sword?
Take it to Subaru man, and hand over keys sharpish, you may be bore washing like mad, and Greenpeace will be on your tail.
#17
my original cat only had 1 sensor, and its was at the bottom of the cat, he choped it of, was hard to cut of, is that the lambda sensor, do i need to replace it,where i live no1 noz about subarus,
#18
the sensor you are talking about is the cat on fire sensor, which is not needed when you fit a decat exhaust, but as others have said you obviously have a problem, get it to a Subaru specialist, where about in Lancashire are you, as there are scoobyteknix up that way
#19
my car is a my00 running around 340bhp & now it still returns easily 300 miles to a tank of v-power
#20
just had a mechanic to have a quick look at it, my lamda sensor is still on the car, its was the cat on fire sensor that has been choped of, iv had new plugs fitted, cars going to go into a technician for him to have a look at it and check everything out. he has been recomended
#23
still might be your lambda sensor it might be goosed ,i just changed mine as i was getting terrible mpg now its back to normal
i have a scangauge to check for error codes... great piece of kit
i have a scangauge to check for error codes... great piece of kit
#25
I have a freshly built engine, new Lambda, coilpacks etc and get around 250m on the combined cycle on 50 litres, or 5m per litre.
So really, you're miles off - even taking into account an aged/tired engine!
I'd first check your fuel system over thoroughly: fuel lines/filter, injector seals/rails, FPR, etc. And check lambda is cycling back and forth between 0 to 1V...
So really, you're miles off - even taking into account an aged/tired engine!
I'd first check your fuel system over thoroughly: fuel lines/filter, injector seals/rails, FPR, etc. And check lambda is cycling back and forth between 0 to 1V...
Last edited by joz8968; 04 February 2010 at 11:44 PM.
#28
#30
That would explain it it bit better. But that's still 'only' under 200m a tank, which is a little off... UNLESS that's lots of hooning involved...???
FTR, it works out at c.17.5mpg, so yeah, a semi-hooning mpg figure lol.
But in future - and unless that's genuine typo - could you pleeeeease make an attempt at writing the word correct first time - as then we wouldn't have wasted 30 posts to date...
Last edited by joz8968; 05 February 2010 at 12:36 PM.