Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Modding a Version 5 Type R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 May 2010 | 11:26 PM
  #1  
ronjeramy's Avatar
ronjeramy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default Modding a Version 5 Type R

As above how far can i take a mechanically std engine and gearbox on the above car? I'm interested in taking it as far as possible without it going pop, am i right in thinking that about 350-380 is the max? and what would be required in doing so? it currently has a HKS hi power exhaust(3inch??? ) cat back and a Zero sports induction pipe. would a panel filter be sufficient or an induction kit? A decat and fuel pump are next on the list of mods followed by a remap. I'm assuming after that it will need injectors and a larger turbo, and possibly a FMIC. is that sort of power attainable without the FMIC, with say a hyperflow TMIC?

Here's a couple of scans of the power run it had recently





Cheers
Old 06 May 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
rickya's Avatar
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 1
From: Herts/Middx
Default

350 bhp approx would be safe for the engine, anymore is a gamble on a std engine.
I had a Hyperflow topmount before & they are the dogs danglies but very expensive & so a good FMIC may become a better option due to price.
Old 06 May 2010 | 01:29 AM
  #3  
bigsinky's Avatar
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
From: Sunny BELFAST
Default

are these power figures right. i thought a sti 5 was 280 out of the box?
Old 06 May 2010 | 08:41 AM
  #4  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

That is a hub dyno bigsinky

Banny
Old 06 May 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #5  
bigsinky's Avatar
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
From: Sunny BELFAST
Default

ahh right (sure what do i know) no resistance losses then is that right? so what would equate to in real money
Old 06 May 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #6  
ronjeramy's Avatar
ronjeramy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
ahh right (sure what do i know) no resistance losses then is that right? so what would equate to in real money
I think it equates to 280-290 give or take, from what the oporater said.

It terms of getting 350 will I be able to get that with the std TMIC? What else would I need?
Old 06 May 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #7  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

Standard tmic will not be up to the job. Parts needed will be:

fmic: £300+
injectors: £300+
turbo: £350
remap (ecutek) £500 + vat
fuel pump: £80

Banny
Old 06 May 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #8  
ronjeramy's Avatar
ronjeramy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

Cheers Banny, was hoping I could avoid the FMIC route.
Old 06 May 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #9  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

Fmic is the easy option but in reality you could fit the newage sti tmic and run with that, but it requires a bit of messing about to fit it

Banny
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #10  
MK2VTR8VALVE's Avatar
MK2VTR8VALVE
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: N.I
Default

But will the gearbox take that sorta power??
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #11  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

If your gentle it will, but you dont need 350bhp with a short geared car, the gearing makes it quicker than say a 350bhp uk classic with the same mods.
You will have to go fmic, that means losing the standard air box, that means if you dont want issues you have to go for a mafless ecu, that means about 1200 quid for a simtek.

Tony
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #12  
MK2VTR8VALVE's Avatar
MK2VTR8VALVE
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: N.I
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
If your gentle it will, but you dont need 350bhp with a short geared car, the gearing makes it quicker than say a 350bhp uk classic with the same mods.
You will have to go fmic, that means losing the standard air box, that means if you dont want issues you have to go for a mafless ecu, that means about 1200 quid for a simtek.

Tony
TBH I don't think it's really worth the expense. My type r is running 335bhp with similar torque. All I did was Nur spec, decat, ported headers & up pipe, fuel pump, green panel filter & JGM remap.

Is it really worth spending all that cash on a simtek, FMIC, turbo etc for not very substantial gains? Some may say yes but I personally doubt it.
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #13  
KAS35RSTI's Avatar
KAS35RSTI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 10
From: 2.0 bar
Default

Originally Posted by MK2VTR8VALVE
But will the gearbox take that sorta power??
I reckon 400ft lbs would be fine with some sympathy & redline gear oil
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
bigsinky's Avatar
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
From: Sunny BELFAST
Default

^^^^^ your a funny guy.
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #15  
KAS35RSTI's Avatar
KAS35RSTI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 10
From: 2.0 bar
Default

Originally Posted by MK2VTR8VALVE
TBH I don't think it's really worth the expense. My type r is running 335bhp with similar torque. All I did was Nur spec, decat, ported headers & up pipe, fuel pump, green panel filter & JGM remap.

Is it really worth spending all that cash on a simtek, FMIC, turbo etc for not very substantial gains? Some may say yes but I personally doubt it.

There are loads of ways mate. You dont have to buy a simtek. Why not just go for a Q45 maf if you are worried that the standard maf might fail.
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

400lbft most go just over 300lbft, even being sympathetic a good 95% will strip a gear easily

Tony
Old 06 May 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #17  
KAS35RSTI's Avatar
KAS35RSTI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 10
From: 2.0 bar
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
400lbft most go just over 300lbft, even being sympathetic a good 95% will strip a gear easily

Tony
You should put it to the test Tony. There are quite a few using the V5/6 box that has been holding over 400ft lbs for a while now. Can be abit risky if you get too carryed away
Old 06 May 2010 | 04:45 PM
  #18  
ronjeramy's Avatar
ronjeramy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
If your gentle it will, but you dont need 350bhp with a short geared car, the gearing makes it quicker than say a 350bhp uk classic with the same mods.
You will have to go fmic, that means losing the standard air box, that means if you dont want issues you have to go for a mafless ecu, that means about 1200 quid for a simtek.

Tony
That's what I'm thinking, 350 with the gearing, not much will keep up, my previous type r was running a link ecu with supporting mods at 300 on a conservative map(1.45 bar peak) and it gave a 996 porker a hard time so my thinking that 350 will be more than enough.
Old 06 May 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #19  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by Aladdin
You should put it to the test Tony. There are quite a few using the V5/6 box that has been holding over 400ft lbs for a while now. Can be abit risky if you get too carryed away
There are also considerably more that have not even gotten past 320lbs, some of those were unabused examples too

I always work on the principle that if it were my car would I want to break it? The answer is no, so I always give the advice that will keep the car reliable, not unreliable and waiting for a nice big bill so 400lbs of torque on a late classic STI gearbox is pretty suicidal, same with anything over 350bhp on a classic engine, you lose reliability and that means big money, some people just cannot afford to take those chances, so I try to make sure they dont have to

Tony
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 08:12 PM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
04 October 2015 10:49 PM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 06:26 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 10:22 AM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 06:41 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.