Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

my03 sti ppp exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 July 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default my03 sti ppp exhaust

does anyone know the diameter of the exhaust ?

i think the bottom of the sports cat is 2.5" to the centre pipe.

i'm after the diameter of the pro drive back box joint as i want to upgrade to a 3" turbo system and keep the prodrive back box


thanks for the help
Old 24 July 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
my94wrx's Avatar
my94wrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TingTongPJ
does anyone know the diameter of the exhaust ?

i think the bottom of the sports cat is 2.5" to the centre pipe.

i'm after the diameter of the pro drive back box joint as i want to upgrade to a 3" turbo system and keep the prodrive back box


thanks for the help
i am pretty sure its 2.5" as when i was speaking to my mapper about my 53ppp sti he said the prodrive backbox can be quite restrictive, i sold the car before getting it mapped, so cant tell you power it was good for.
Old 24 July 2010 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

2.5inch. Restrictive above 360bhp, had 353bhp on a blob sti ppp full exhaust yesterday
Old 24 July 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
2.5inch. Restrictive above 360bhp, had 353bhp on a blob sti ppp full exhaust yesterday

thanks simon

wanted to keep the quiet back box
Old 24 July 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #5  
fastboyslim's Avatar
fastboyslim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Twickenham
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
2.5inch. Restrictive above 360bhp, had 353bhp on a blob sti ppp full exhaust yesterday
Simon, was that 2lt or 2.5lt and was there enything else done to the car to reach 353bhp?

Last edited by fastboyslim; 25 July 2010 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Poor spelling! hahahaha
Old 24 July 2010 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by fastboyslim
Simon, whas that 2lt or 2.5lt and was there enything else done to the car to reach 353bhp?
Standard ppp 2litre sti with a panel filter (not sure what make)
Was on a dyno dynamics rr.
Old 24 July 2010 | 10:42 PM
  #7  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

Was very impressed with that car when it was being mapped
Old 24 July 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #8  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

was awesome car, test drive was funny as no loud exhaust but went like stink

Simon
Old 24 July 2010 | 11:15 PM
  #9  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

What torque didnthat produce Simon ? Asuming it was on a vf35 as well.
Old 25 July 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #10  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by TingTongPJ
What torque didnthat produce Simon ? Asuming it was on a vf35 as well.
345lb iirc

Simon
Old 25 July 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #11  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Question

Simon, are you saying that the Prodrive bb is restrictive beyond 360bhp.... or any 2.5" system, in general, is?

Last edited by joz8968; 25 July 2010 at 11:04 AM.
Old 25 July 2010 | 11:25 AM
  #12  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

ppp complete system, 2.5 after market consider restrictive about 400 on

Simon
Old 25 July 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #13  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Question

Simon

I currently have a bit of a Frankenstein's monster setup:-

* Syms equal length headers
* Syms sportscat (don't know if it's 100 or 200cell)
* 2.5" straight-thru - no resonators/no cats - centre (of unknown brand)
* 2.5" Prodrive bb

(I'll also add a slip-jointed 40mm uppipe when I fit those 20g/550/FMIC/3-port BCS/FPR, etc. ).

What would you estimate its max power potential is likely to be? <400? i.e. is it likely to limit the 20g's potential max output?

Last edited by joz8968; 25 July 2010 at 01:23 PM.
Old 25 July 2010 | 01:13 PM
  #14  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

The STi PPP system (on the MY03 at least) kept the original resonator section which was actually smaller than the 2.5" of the rest of the PPP pipework.

JohnD
Old 25 July 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #15  
L.J.F's Avatar
L.J.F
Instructing with fear
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,101
Likes: 1
From: Www.Extreme-rally.co.uk
Default

Hi Simon, i am planning on having my 02 bug sti mapped with you very shortly. I was planning on keeping the prodrive backbox and centre pipe and using a after market decat downpipe. I am also planning on fitting a 3 port, magnex headers and up pipe. Do you think the centre pipe would be too restrictive?? Also is there any other mods you would advice on for a better mapping session?


cheers
Old 25 July 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #16  
L.J.F's Avatar
L.J.F
Instructing with fear
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,101
Likes: 1
From: Www.Extreme-rally.co.uk
Default

Hi Simon, i am planning on having my 02 bug sti mapped with you very shortly. I was planning on keeping the prodrive backbox and centre pipe and using a after market decat downpipe. I am also planning on fitting a 3 port, magnex headers and up pipe. Do you think the centre pipe would be too restrictive?? Also is there any other mods you would advice on for a better mapping session?


cheers
Old 25 July 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #17  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
Simon

I currently have a bit of a Frankenstein's monster setup: Syms equal length headers; Syms sportscat (don't know if it's 100 or 200cell); 2.5" stright-thru centre (of unknown brand); 2.5" Prodrive bb. (I'd also add a slip-jointed 40mm uppipe when I fit those 20g/550/FMIC, etc. ).

What would you estimate its max power potential is likely to be? 400?
the problem is you need to look at it as how much will it reduce it by as a percentage rather than a how much will it restrict it too..

if you put a large turbo on it then it will still make reasonable power but the back pressure will cause issues elsewhere along with the power.

I would assume 380+ would cause you issues.. you could well get 400 but you need to then consider the back pressure and the effects on the engine, I had 416bhp on my 2.5inch exhaust, changing to 3inch allowed me to remap it to 451bhp.

A car running 500bhp on a 3inch system on the dyno we put the 2inch holed bung in the tail pipe.. it lost over 100bhp.. and the engine sounded so restricted and only sounded fine at actuator pressure.

If you want quiet then get one of the quieter 3inch systems

Simon
Old 25 July 2010 | 03:03 PM
  #18  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by L.J.F
Hi Simon, i am planning on having my 02 bug sti mapped with you very shortly. I was planning on keeping the prodrive backbox and centre pipe and using a after market decat downpipe. I am also planning on fitting a 3 port, magnex headers and up pipe. Do you think the centre pipe would be too restrictive?? Also is there any other mods you would advice on for a better mapping session?


cheers
header change is not really neccessary at this point and the standard centre shouldn't be restrictive at this level no..

Panel filter change would be worth while

Simon
Old 25 July 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #19  
JP4's Avatar
JP4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
From: 700+ WR1 aka The Vuvu Zela...10.6 @ 136 weighing 1370kg....say no more....
Default

When we took my wr1 running sc46 with sportscat it was fine up to 360bhp. But at 400 it really started suffocating. As soon as we decated her (3" decat downpipe and remaining 3" Cobra straighthrough) it changed her into an absolute animal!
Old 25 July 2010 | 04:19 PM
  #20  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Question

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
the problem is you need to look at it as how much will it reduce it by as a percentage rather than a how much will it restrict it too..

if you put a large turbo on it then it will still make reasonable power but the back pressure will cause issues elsewhere along with the power.

I would assume 380+ would cause you issues.. you could well get 400 but you need to then consider the back pressure and the effects on the engine, I had 416bhp on my 2.5inch exhaust, changing to 3inch allowed me to remap it to 451bhp.

A car running 500bhp on a 3inch system on the dyno we put the 2inch holed bung in the tail pipe.. it lost over 100bhp.. and the engine sounded so restricted and only sounded fine at actuator pressure.

If you want quiet then get one of the quieter 3inch systems

Simon
Thanks

If I therefore change to a Cobra 3" straight thru system (from d/p back), will it free up everything? (not worried about noise lol ).

Or will my existing sportscat still limit it significantly in any way?
Old 25 July 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #21  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

what power can you run the standard headers up to presuming you have a full 3" de-cat exhaust ?

my thoughts are i have a choice of 2 turbo's but rather than chase a big bhp number i want something thats enjoyable as a road car
Old 26 July 2010 | 01:18 AM
  #22  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
Thanks

If I therefore change to a Cobra 3" straight thru system (from d/p back), will it free up everything? (not worried about noise lol ).

Or will my existing sportscat still limit it significantly in any way?
what power are you aiming for?

on the standard turbo no it won't alter it much at all having the sports cat in there

if 400 then yes it will restrict it

Simon
Old 26 July 2010 | 01:19 AM
  #23  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by TingTongPJ
what power can you run the standard headers up to presuming you have a full 3" de-cat exhaust ?

my thoughts are i have a choice of 2 turbo's but rather than chase a big bhp number i want something thats enjoyable as a road car
stsandard headers okay to early 400s.. without issue

Simon
Old 26 July 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #24  
Murrayf99's Avatar
Murrayf99
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: London (KT4)
Default

While we are talking PPP - do the 03-05 PPP cars have cats int the up-pipe? Anyone know what changes on the PPP exhaust front to back? New downpipe? Freer flowing cat ?
Old 26 July 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #25  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
stsandard headers okay to early 400s.. without issue

Simon
thanks simon thats just what i wanted to hear
Old 26 July 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #26  
TingTongPJ's Avatar
TingTongPJ
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
From: Flocksville
Default

Originally Posted by Murrayf99
While we are talking PPP - do the 03-05 PPP cars have cats int the up-pipe? Anyone know what changes on the PPP exhaust front to back? New downpipe? Freer flowing cat ?

i'm sure someone will put this right if i have got it wrong

depends what model you have, the sti has no cat in the up pipe but the wrx does.

my car currently (sti) has a prodrive sports cat at the front, straight centre section (getting rid of one cat) and the pro-drive back box. the previous owner did this to get a bit more power, nicer burble and still pass mot's with no problems.
Old 26 July 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #27  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Question

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
what power are you aiming for?

on the standard turbo no it won't alter it much at all having the sports cat in there

if 400 then yes it will restrict it

Simon

Yeah, c.400 would be the 'goal'.


So what you're saying is:

A) At the moment, if I get mapped on the std VF28 I should make around 320, and therefore the exisitng sportscat and 2.5" system are fine?

B) But when going for 400, even if I did get a full 3" system, then it'd be 'wasted' somewhat, UNLESS I also changed to a full decat d/p at the same time, prior to the remap?

Last edited by joz8968; 26 July 2010 at 12:00 PM.
Old 27 July 2010 | 02:07 AM
  #28  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Yes

you could get the sportscat downpipe altered to 3inch at the bottom but still the sports cat will be restrictive a little

Simon
Old 27 July 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #29  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Default

Just one more question:-

If I get a full 3" decat and system... BUT... it has a OEM sized 2.5" join between d/p and centre, does this restrict things loads then - compared to if it was a "true" 3", flanges and all?
Old 27 July 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #30  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
Just one more question:-

If I get a full 3" decat and system... BUT... it has a OEM sized 2.5" join between d/p and centre, does this restrict things loads then - compared to if it was a "true" 3", flanges and all?
Yes it will.
Get it altered when taken off for turbo fitment



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.