02 sensor and apexi power fc
#1
02 sensor and apexi power fc
how can i tell if my o2 sensor is fubared, im sure i read somewhere you can tell from a read out on the apexi fc commander.
any ideas?
thanks
any ideas?
thanks
#2
Yes you can. It's within the "Sensors..." menu. Then look for "O2..." with engine idling. It should continually cycle up and down between 0 and 0.9V if working fine.
Make sure O2 feedback is turned on in the "Etc." menu first though (it should already be, obviously)...
Make sure O2 feedback is turned on in the "Etc." menu first though (it should already be, obviously)...
Last edited by joz8968; 22 February 2011 at 11:54 PM.
#3
thanks joz and if it is bust, will it just display a constant number with out cycling up and down?
have just noticed that o dont get as many miles, but it could be in my head as thinking , i have just put in £50 but only get x amound of miles etc
have just noticed that o dont get as many miles, but it could be in my head as thinking , i have just put in £50 but only get x amound of miles etc
#4
Yeah, when they fail, voltage pretty much goes static. It could well be that the mapper has failed simply to turn on the 02 sensor via the Etc. menu. Means you'll get crap mpg off boost.
#5
had a look today con the commander, but it is jap, so cant tell if it is turned on, but i would guess it is.
when engine is at running temp, and idling in the sensor check 02S reads 0.00 today, but when you go faster or slower when driving, it reads around 0.00, but if you have it as a constant speed it reads around .064v
the other day on a cold engine, at idle, it was around 0.02-0.08 ish
any ideas?
when engine is at running temp, and idling in the sensor check 02S reads 0.00 today, but when you go faster or slower when driving, it reads around 0.00, but if you have it as a constant speed it reads around .064v
the other day on a cold engine, at idle, it was around 0.02-0.08 ish
any ideas?
Trending Topics
#11
#13
Yep, it's OFF!
Turn it back on and recheck for the cycling - it'll prob then be working okay!
Scroll to the "02..." line with the ^ or V buttons. Then press NEXT. Change to "7y" using the ^ or V (or it might be the < or >) buttons. Press NEXT twice to save. Then come out of the menu using the PREV button. Then go back in just to make sure it did indeed change to "7y".
Then recheck the cycling in the other "Sensors..." menu, etc...
Turn it back on and recheck for the cycling - it'll prob then be working okay!
Scroll to the "02..." line with the ^ or V buttons. Then press NEXT. Change to "7y" using the ^ or V (or it might be the < or >) buttons. Press NEXT twice to save. Then come out of the menu using the PREV button. Then go back in just to make sure it did indeed change to "7y".
Then recheck the cycling in the other "Sensors..." menu, etc...
Last edited by joz8968; 27 February 2011 at 02:55 PM.
#14
i wonder why it has been turned off?
would it affect the bhp/lbft from a rolling road
also would this cause it to use more fuel?
would it affect the bhp/lbft from a rolling road
also would this cause it to use more fuel?
Last edited by Ian; 27 February 2011 at 03:01 PM.
#15
- It won't affect the peak bhp + lb ft as it's automatially disabled when in open loop i.e. on boost above a certain (low) rpm point. Then when parameters allow, it automatically reverts back to closed loop again i.e. lambda enabled.
- Yeah, mpg will suffer as the lambda, being disabled, cannot constantly sample the O2 content in the exhaust gases, so is incapable of telling the ECU to trim (or add) fuel to try to keep to the perfect stoichiometric 14.7:1 A/F ratio...
- Yeah, mpg will suffer as the lambda, being disabled, cannot constantly sample the O2 content in the exhaust gases, so is incapable of telling the ECU to trim (or add) fuel to try to keep to the perfect stoichiometric 14.7:1 A/F ratio...
Last edited by joz8968; 27 February 2011 at 03:22 PM.
#16
The net result of running with O2 disabled is heavy(er) fuel consumption/bad emissions due to over rich closed loop AFRs.
Whether that would lead to bore wash and/or a carbon'd up engine over a long period of time, I don't know...
Whether that would lead to bore wash and/or a carbon'd up engine over a long period of time, I don't know...
Last edited by joz8968; 27 February 2011 at 03:29 PM.
#17
Could well lead to bore wash and smoking issues from ring not sealing properly John over a period of time,how long has it been off?
#22
http://www.paulr33.com/powerfc-faq/powerfc-faq.htm#40b
If you have 0/2 Feedback turned off the PowerFC will not enter its closed loop feedback mode and will waste fuel and be very un-economical. Expect bad fuel economy
If you have 0/2 Feedback turned off the PowerFC will not enter its closed loop feedback mode and will waste fuel and be very un-economical. Expect bad fuel economy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM