anyone run an APS SR50 turbo on 2L
#1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
From: glenrothes,fife SCOTLAND!!!!!!
anyone run an APS SR50 turbo on 2L
as above anyone running one of these aps sr50 turbos on a 2L engine?
done a search but does not really bring too much up about it, would be interested to hear what supporting mods, what figures bhp and lb what spool and what boost etc etc
engine will be sti7 with avcs and will have supporting mods tmic only at this time, may be changed to fmic though, the usual decat etc, running a vf35 at 340bhp currently.
Grant
done a search but does not really bring too much up about it, would be interested to hear what supporting mods, what figures bhp and lb what spool and what boost etc etc
engine will be sti7 with avcs and will have supporting mods tmic only at this time, may be changed to fmic though, the usual decat etc, running a vf35 at 340bhp currently.
Grant
#2
Hi Grant
this will help
https://www.scoobynet.com/drivetrain...w-much-hp.html
Depends how much for this turbo,because from reports making around 400-440bhp+
Jura
this will help
https://www.scoobynet.com/drivetrain...w-much-hp.html
Depends how much for this turbo,because from reports making around 400-440bhp+
Jura
#3
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
From: glenrothes,fife SCOTLAND!!!!!!
thanks for the that jura, i wondered if you post, read that thread but not impressed with the figures on there, you think it would be good for 380-400 then and with a decent spool? what about lag better or worse than a 20g?
Grant
Grant
#4
I've seen 400bhp from APS SR40 which one was made 400bhp,and spool really nice on 2.5L
For 380-400bhp will be OK,but not sure about the spool wise on 2.0L
Jura
#6
i have an SR40 and it compares to an 18g turbo, you need to really push it to get 400bhp it would seem, most make anywhere between 360-380. i think the 50 is better suited to the 2.5 but will be quite laggy on a 2.0. out of interest why are you choosing this turbo when there are far better options available? do you already have it or is it going cheap?
#7
Don't do it!!
I have the APS SR40 on my 2.5 (405BHP - the most JGM has seen from one of these historically under-performing turbos) and it does spool pretty well (AVCS Heads ported headers, Harvey custom up-pipe), when it was on the 2.0 it was sh*t!
Only 1 bar at 4250rpm and only 370BHP - remember that APS quote this as a 440BHP turbo!!! The SR50 will be even more laggy and you'll be lucky to see much over 400 on a 2.0.
Graph from when it was on the 2.0 lower figures were without ported headers and on std manifold/inlet pie.
I'd get in touch with AET turbos, or just buy an off the shelf MD321, MD555 or SC turbo!
I have the APS SR40 on my 2.5 (405BHP - the most JGM has seen from one of these historically under-performing turbos) and it does spool pretty well (AVCS Heads ported headers, Harvey custom up-pipe), when it was on the 2.0 it was sh*t!
Only 1 bar at 4250rpm and only 370BHP - remember that APS quote this as a 440BHP turbo!!! The SR50 will be even more laggy and you'll be lucky to see much over 400 on a 2.0.
Graph from when it was on the 2.0 lower figures were without ported headers and on std manifold/inlet pie.
I'd get in touch with AET turbos, or just buy an off the shelf MD321, MD555 or SC turbo!
Last edited by BlueBugEye; 03 July 2011 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Posted wrong graph!
Trending Topics
#9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
From: glenrothes,fife SCOTLAND!!!!!!
thanks for the input guys, yeah ideally i would have an md321 which is what i would rather, only reason i even considered this turbo is i got offered it cheap, goal would be no more than 400 really anyway
#10
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 04:08 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 11:42 AM