Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

e10 coming.. and our sti's can't handle it!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 December 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #1  
JAckyWhite's Avatar
JAckyWhite
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: durham
Default e10 coming.. and our sti's can't handle it!

pistonheeds post on e10 fuel coming next year..

http://www.pistonheads.com/news/defa...ign=2011-12-20

..and by checking the list..

http://www.flexfuelkit.com.au/articl...E10/Page1.html

Impreza WRX STI (1999 to 2005) - dont comply..

What do we do? reMap them to take it? LPG convert them?

Bugger..

J
Old 20 December 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
DonNedly's Avatar
DonNedly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

and biofuels cause 4 times more carbon emissions than petrol or diesel so even if you believe the climate change bollox it still doesn't make sense.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...emissions.html
Old 20 December 2011 | 07:01 PM
  #3  
Andy RB5's Avatar
Andy RB5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 118
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

If you follow the link at the bottom of the pistonheads page to their list is states the following or Subaru;


Subaru:
E10 petrol is cleared for use in all models with petrol engines manufactured from 1st January 1991 with
the exception of the following models:

All Vivio models.
Justy manufactured before April 1994.


Hopefully by the time it comes out there will be some sort of official statement from Subaru or something
Old 20 December 2011 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
dj219957's Avatar
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 1
From: Staffs
Default

another reason to hate the EU.
Old 20 December 2011 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
DonNedly's Avatar
DonNedly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

It maybe safe (ish) regarding corrosion of fuel lines but it totally messes with the octane rating so not good for subarus.
Old 21 December 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
acstua's Avatar
acstua
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

http://www.hrscc.co.nz/FJ-MotorSportNewsApril08.pdf
Old 22 December 2011 | 10:07 AM
  #7  
DonNedly's Avatar
DonNedly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

so e10 is less economical as well. great!
Old 22 December 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #8  
CREWJ's Avatar
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 1
From: Aberdare / Daventry
Default

I wonder if general non turbo cars should get a remap for this E10.
Old 22 December 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
acstua's Avatar
acstua
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

http://www.allsafe-fuel.org/TechPaper.pdf
Old 22 December 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #10  
topshot's Avatar
topshot
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 967
Likes: 1
From: Northamptonshire
Default

I thought it actually increased the octane rating?
Isnt the issue that its corrosive and so seal and fuel lines get attacked?

Surely they will need to find a way to make it safe for ALL cars?
Old 22 December 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #11  
ScoobySteve69's Avatar
ScoobySteve69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,636
Likes: 0
From: North Wales.
Default

Originally Posted by acstua
That`s a lot of reading
Old 22 December 2011 | 12:16 PM
  #12  
ScoobySteve69's Avatar
ScoobySteve69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,636
Likes: 0
From: North Wales.
Default

Originally Posted by topshot
I thought it actually increased the octane rating?
Isnt the issue that its corrosive and so seal and fuel lines get attacked?

Surely they will need to find a way to make it safe for ALL cars?
Something will have to be done otherwise millions of cars will have to be scrapped.......ohhhhh, maybe that`s the governments plan
Old 22 December 2011 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

In reference to the OP's post the PH article about Bio Fuel compatibility is resourced from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, the European Automobile Manufacturer's Association, and maybe the most significant - the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association.

The article from Flexfuel appears to have been written back in 2008 by the Australian equivalent of Jeremy Clarkson, and the information is drawn from the Australian Consumer's Association. I don't know Ballinger's work and stand to be corrected if this innaccurate.

Whilst I think Clarkson et al do fine job of entertaining us, I would hope that the major associations backing the PH article have more up to date factual research to call on.
Or we're all in the ****
Old 22 December 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #14  
CREWJ's Avatar
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 1
From: Aberdare / Daventry
Default

I know they won't NEED a remap but would it be beneficial?
Old 22 December 2011 | 09:06 PM
  #15  
DonNedly's Avatar
DonNedly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

Originally Posted by topshot
I thought it actually increased the octane rating?
Isnt the issue that its corrosive and so seal and fuel lines get attacked?

Surely they will need to find a way to make it safe for ALL cars?

It is often claimed to have 105 octane but this is a miscalculation. E85 has an octane rating of 94-96 so i dunno what E10 would actually be.

I also read somewhere it seperates when left in a fuel tank for a long time and will eat through the tank.
Old 23 December 2011 | 07:27 AM
  #16  
f4la k's Avatar
f4la k
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

I run v/power and a 30% meth mix, think i'll change to 100% meth. Its about a quid a litre, so no that expensive, just a **** to start in the cold.
Old 23 December 2011 | 12:25 PM
  #17  
Galifrey's Avatar
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Corsham
Default

Millers do an Additive for cars that shouldn't use E10 http://www.millersoils.net/1_Millers_frame_CLASSIC.htm
Old 23 December 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #18  
topshot's Avatar
topshot
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 967
Likes: 1
From: Northamptonshire
Default

Originally Posted by Galifrey
Millers do an Additive for cars that shouldn't use E10 http://www.millersoils.net/1_Millers_frame_CLASSIC.htm
one bottle treats 40L of fuel and its £6.99
Old 23 December 2011 | 01:12 PM
  #19  
poolio74's Avatar
poolio74
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Devon
Default

What a load of f***ing ****e!God damn eu.Like theres not enuff things in life to worry about,now this!
Old 23 December 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #20  
Galifrey's Avatar
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Corsham
Default

Originally Posted by topshot
one bottle treats 40L of fuel and its £6.99
I know, pretty sucky, but if there is an additive, surely sooner or later the fuel companies will sell it as Classic Safe E10 or some such ****.
Old 23 December 2011 | 01:35 PM
  #21  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by Andy RB5
If you follow the link at the bottom of the pistonheads page to their list is states the following or Subaru;


Subaru:
E10 petrol is cleared for use in all models with petrol engines manufactured from 1st January 1991 with
the exception of the following models:

All Vivio models.
Justy manufactured before April 1994.
Yep, looks like we're all 'okay' then.

I have no probs with getting a remap for it (at the point when V-Power starts to disappear over time). But will be mighty pissed if the calorific content means a significant drop in power and torque!

Last edited by joz8968; 23 December 2011 at 01:38 PM.
Old 23 December 2011 | 02:14 PM
  #22  
cookie sti's Avatar
cookie sti
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: ramsgate in kent
Default

What i can make out any wrx sti made before 1999 or after 2005 is all ok what about uk2000 cars and wrx of all ages?
Also due to the new fuels being made available at the pumps some of the car will need a remap but by the new mot standards a remapped car will be a failure or am i getting a bit misled on this 1/
Old 23 December 2011 | 02:21 PM
  #23  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 8
From: Leicester
Default

Everything is ****ed.
Old 23 December 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #24  
topshot's Avatar
topshot
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 967
Likes: 1
From: Northamptonshire
Default

Originally Posted by cookie sti
What i can make out any wrx sti made before 1999 or after 2005 is all ok what about uk2000 cars and wrx of all ages?
Also due to the new fuels being made available at the pumps some of the car will need a remap but by the new mot standards a remapped car will be a failure or am i getting a bit misled on this 1/
As far as i know all uk imprezas are fine, its the wrx sti classic that i thought had issues?

that MOT law is completely misunderstood. Remapping a car is not a failure.
Old 23 December 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #25  
topshot's Avatar
topshot
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 967
Likes: 1
From: Northamptonshire
Default

Originally Posted by Galifrey
I know, pretty sucky, but if there is an additive, surely sooner or later the fuel companies will sell it as Classic Safe E10 or some such ****.
Hopefully scale of production etc will make it reduce in cost. Surely the fuel companies can just add it at the pumps? Hope so as the skyline and pug both are not able to use it

Last edited by topshot; 23 December 2011 at 03:18 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
18 November 2015 08:49 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 PM.