Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

car failed mot on emissions & lamda with milltek sports cat - advice needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 March 2012 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default car failed mot on emissions & lamda with milltek sports cat - advice needed

car is a 2006 uk subaru impreza wrx hawkeye with full 3 inch milltek exhaust and milltek sports cat.

it just failed mot today due to emissions and lamda levels, I've had the car 5 months and this is 1st mot for me.

garage noticed 1 of 2 lamda probe not fitted to sports cat so could this be the lamda fail 'outside specified limits' - (7.3.D.4) on mot sheet. this lamda doesnt look like it will fit into sports cats current hole that has been bunged up. the other lamda is fitted further down the exhaust on the next exhaust pipe down from the sports cat.

and the high emissions - 5.2.5A, 7.3.D4 - could this due to not getting the cat hot enough on a good blast?

anyone know of a friendly mot testers in the hull, east yorkshire area - can u pm me please?

car has been remapped to 340bhp, 390 torque so if i get lamda probe refitted will car need a remap?

cheers, rob.
Old 22 March 2012 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
ksg10's Avatar
ksg10
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

I've heard of a few people with all different sorts of cars using sports cats, and they always had to get the exhaust piping hot before managing to scrape through the emissions test.
Old 22 March 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #3  
scrappydoo7619's Avatar
scrappydoo7619
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Default

Just spoke to the guys I recommended to you Rob, and he says the same, give it a good blast first, make sure its nice and hot and give him a call
Old 22 March 2012 | 08:02 PM
  #4  
Firez34's Avatar
Firez34
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Default

Took mine in 10 days ago for the mot with the scooby world 100cel sports cat and the guy's in the MOT station had to rev the car for five minutes to get it hot enough to work properly which is normal. Once hot it passed fine. Hope you get it through fella.
Old 22 March 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #5  
STiFreak's Avatar
STiFreak
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Default

Can you give us the actual values that were recorded for lambda and the various exhaust gases. If your car is not running at lambda (i.e too rich or lean) it can cause some of the gases to read higher.

Mines on a Milltek with Sports Cat and I've never had issues with the MOT (values are way under the limits and that's without having to cane the car before the test).
Old 22 March 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #6  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

Your cat will only work correctly at lambda = 1 . Any richer than lambda=1 and the cat efficiency drops right off. Getting a cat really hot before testing burns of any sulphur and other contminants and gives the cat its best chance of working efficently when AFR returns to lambda=1.

The cat doesnt have any affect on lambda but lambda does have an effect on the cat.

As STI Freak says, give us your MOT emissions results so we can help more.

You should have a lambda sensor in the up-pipe to the turbo and after the downpipe sports cat.

I don't believe that you only have one sensor fitted, sounds like there is a boss in the sportscat downpipe that could take a aftermarket lambda sensor if you wanted to fit one. My H&S sportscat has the same.

Last edited by DT-SPD; 22 March 2012 at 09:58 PM. Reason: add detail
Old 23 March 2012 | 07:08 AM
  #7  
BlueBugEye's Avatar
BlueBugEye
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
From: Littlehampton
Default

Pretty sure my Bugeye only has one Lambda as std (just after the collector in the headers) I do also have a wideband in the downpipe now as well though. So the bung should be in your downpipe (I have the same exhaust) unless you have fitted an extra sensor.

Mine also passes without issue and without having to get too hot (Miltek with sports cat in centre section 3' Powerstation/Litchfield system) - your issue is your lambda is off which is a mapping/sensor issue.
Old 23 March 2012 | 07:49 AM
  #8  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

thx for all the advice, just finished night shift, below is results sheet from mot.

Old 23 March 2012 | 11:30 AM
  #9  
petethemeat's Avatar
petethemeat
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Lancs
Default

Originally Posted by robl
thx for all the advice, just finished night shift, below is results sheet from mot.


was it properly warmed up i.e. Oil up to temp not just visually on the temp gauge (water) ? If not then this is your issue as mentioned above.
Old 23 March 2012 | 12:40 PM
  #10  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

The mixture is too rich, so the cat isn't at fault here.
It sounds as though the primary lambda sensor either isn't fitted, or it's fitted in the wrong place.
Old 23 March 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #11  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

I agree wuth Alan, doesnt look like anything wrong with your cat, HC values not too bad so it is working, just not enough to pass the test. Get your AFR to lambda=1 and it will be ok.

I would expect a missing lambda sensor to cause a larger problem and check engine light ( MIL ) to come on, although whoever mapped it may have turned of lambda diagnostics.

As always, difficult to diagnose without seeing the car.
Old 23 March 2012 | 09:36 PM
  #12  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

thx for all the help so far. I just had a look today, I have 1 lamda fitted in engine bay (air filter side) that has a blue wiring sleeve.

the lamda thats not fitted has a yellow wiring sleeve if thats means anything? also it was mapped by andy forrest.

heres a pic of my lamdas


so if my lamda is reading low, could that be a faulty lamda sensor? or has the car maybe been mapped to run richer in fuel? or does it really need both lamdas fitted? there is a hole/boss in the downpipe right near where the yellow sleeved lamda is not connected - i wonder why its not connected.
Old 23 March 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #13  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

Odd that the second lambda isnt fitted correctly. I assume that there is a bung in the hole and not an open hole ??

I suggest refitting it, check/clear faults in the ECU and go for a drive. If it still fails MOT then it would look like the front sensor isnt working correctly.

Very unlikely it has been mapped to run rich at the speeds/loads that a MOT test uses, it should be in closed loop mode and sit nicely at lambda=1
Old 23 March 2012 | 10:16 PM
  #14  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

the 2nd lamda is just neatly tie wrapped up about 6 inches from bung near exhaust.

theres a mega tight bung fitted, I will get a garage to refit it and test/reset ecu etc then retest at mot garage.

yeah my Scangauge II obd reader currently says its in a closed loop.
Old 23 March 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #15  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

Sounds a good plan.

Rear sensor doesnt do a huge amount, mainly used for diagnostics of the downpipe catalyst, so you should have a check engine light come on, however as its been mapped its most likely been turned off.

Fingers crossed it works
Old 24 March 2012 | 08:53 AM
  #16  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

OK, the diagram looks right. Try it again, but you may have to investigate why the AFR itself looks rich. You may possibly have a duff primary lambda sensor.
Old 24 March 2012 | 12:37 PM
  #17  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

ah right ok , thx all for the help.
Old 29 April 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #18  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

update - took it for another mot at a different garage and its failed on emissions and lambda levels again (roughly same readings as before). both garages offered no help and didnt want to get involved with the car once i told them about mods/remap.

so took it to another garage (jap specialist) but they were no interested in helping either.

does does anyone know the colour of the signal wire on the 1st lambda to test it to see if its working? ie on early imprezas its white, so is it white on hawkeyes? as when i took a multimeter reading off the white lambda wire is was 2.5v constant (on 20v setting on multimeter). my car (2006 uk wrx hawkeye) has 4 wires - 2 black, 1 white, 1 blue.

so to recount

1- front pre cat lambda plugged in/wired in.
2- after cat/rear lambda not plugged into exhaust but wired in - i imagine to take a clean reading of emissions.

I'm going to ring a few more garages local on monday about just testing the 1st lambda/fitting a new one.
Old 29 April 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #19  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

I would use a OBD tool with live readings to check the front lambda signal response, its a lot easier than messing around with a multimeter.

I see no reason for not refitting the second lambda sensor, you may find that its the cause of all your issues.
Old 29 April 2012 | 02:43 PM
  #20  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

ah right i see, cheers. could you recommend a obd tool with live readings?
Old 29 April 2012 | 02:55 PM
  #21  
DT-SPD's Avatar
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Rugby
Default

I have a Autel item from HERE

I have also used a ELM327 bluetooth OBDII adaptor from ebay ( about £18 ) paired with an app called Torque on android, this can display live data such as lambda sensor volts but I have not fully tested it on my Subaru.
Old 29 April 2012 | 03:05 PM
  #22  
robl's Avatar
robl
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Kingston-Upon-Hull
Default

ok thx alot, i'll buy one of those autels.

just bought one from autel direct on ebay for £60 delivered.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM
taylor85
Wanted
2
13 September 2015 04:57 PM
AzzDSM
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
13 September 2015 03:59 PM
robbie1988
Wanted
2
13 September 2015 09:25 AM
Reshard1977
Wanted
0
07 September 2015 02:03 PM



Quick Reply: car failed mot on emissions & lamda with milltek sports cat - advice needed



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.