Saalro

iTrader: (8)

Deleted

leecalcars

iTrader: (37)

Sounds like the geometry needs looking at Sam

Are you scrubbing tyres ?

Saalro

iTrader: (8)

Had the geometry done today, - 1.40 degrees camber on the front, 0 toe, then - 1.23 degrees camber on the passenger rear and - 1.06 on the driver side rear, 0.03 toe out on the rears.

The - 1.06 was the most camber that could be had with the adjustable top mounts and the camber bolts. The 1.23 has slight more adjustablilty, just seems as if the chassis is a fraction to one side!


Thanks

Saalro

iTrader: (8)

Deleted

scooby-k

the wheel offset is also contributing to this. ET 48 is newage. Classic is ET53. I know it's only 5mm but if the geometry is slightly out it takes away what little clearance there is.

Saalro

iTrader: (8)

I'm curious as to why the distances are different.
Given the rear camber was the same, there would still be a difference in distance between the tyres outer wall and the arch, as if to suggest the chassis is not centre on the suspension.
But i guess no car is perfect?

Thanks

360ste

iTrader: (1)

Looking at the two photo's the graduation scales are offset as this bit does not move I wonder if they have been fitted to the wrong sides? An observation only.

Saalro

iTrader: (8)

I fitted them myself and was thinking the same thing you know, but there is no indication to what side is what! Maybe i should contact HSD.

Thanks