Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

MD321T MDX321T Turbo Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 October 2012 | 11:05 PM
  #1  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default MD321T MDX321T Turbo Advice

Hi All,
Can someone tell me exactly what the difference is between the MD321T & the MDX321T.
After deciding to upgrade my RCM400 I had a short list of MD321T or H or SC46 or 42.
However my mappers opinion is that only the 42 on my list would be suitable, but he has advised me to consider the MDX321T. Car is 96STI 2L CDB fully forged.
I'm inclined to go with my mappers choice as he's always right about my car, but just after other opinions & info on the MDX.
Old 18 October 2012 | 11:15 PM
  #2  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 23
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Ones Billet and ones not I assume.
Old 18 October 2012 | 11:40 PM
  #3  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Hi Richard

MDX321T is billet and will spool quicker on the 2.0L
MD321T is non billet and will spool later than MDX321T

We are run MDX321T on our wagon

Jura
Old 19 October 2012 | 12:15 AM
  #4  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

So the only difference is the billet wheel meaning it spools earlier & is less laggy meaning it would be suitable for a 2L. Has anyone tried the MDX & the SC42 for a comparison?
Old 19 October 2012 | 12:24 AM
  #5  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by RICHARD J
So the only difference is the billet wheel meaning it spools earlier & is less laggy meaning it would be suitable for a 2L. Has anyone tried the MDX & the SC42 for a comparison?
I would say yes Billet MDX321T will be more suitable for 2.0L

This is SC42 on 2.0L STi with AVCS

Name:  image.png
Views: 0
Size:  325.8 KB

This is MDX321T on 2.0L STi with AVCS

Name:  graphpic.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  46.4 KB


Jura
Old 19 October 2012 | 12:40 AM
  #6  
KAS35RSTI's Avatar
KAS35RSTI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 10
From: 2.0 bar
Default

Go for the billet H on a 2.0l. It would be ideal with extra spool. Dont let the figures get to you.
Old 19 October 2012 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 23
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

I would go slightly further from what KAS35RSTI has said and state that it can certainly be about the figures, but you really need to look at the area UNDER the curve and not just peak.

Based on those two graphs above I would say that the SC42 one is quite a bit better than the MDX321T in the lowdown area. However the graph below (which is mine on a OEM 2ltr JDM with AVCS) is better than both, using the Billet LM450. It has the spool of the SC42 (mine has pretty amazing torque for a 2ltr) and the top end to match the MDX321T.

All peak figures are around the same, but it just highlights what you REALLY need to look at when comparing graphs.

Name:  IMG_1324.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  273.6 KB
Old 19 October 2012 | 09:39 AM
  #8  
P1P!'s Avatar
P1P!
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Scottish Borders
Default

It's amazing what 2.0L engine can produce these days with the latest standard location turbos
Old 19 October 2012 | 08:37 PM
  #9  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

Not familiar with the LM 450 will try to do some research on it. Iv been told that the MD 321T can have a billet conversion. Will this make it an MDX321T, & is this worthwhile & cost effective?
Old 19 October 2012 | 08:52 PM
  #10  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by RICHARD J
Not familiar with the LM 450 will try to do some research on it. Iv been told that the MD 321T can have a billet conversion. Will this make it an MDX321T, & is this worthwhile & cost effective?

LM Turbo is Twinscroll from Lichtfield Imports.

Yes is possible to convert non billet MD321T or V to the MDX321T Billet


Jura
Old 19 October 2012 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
LM Turbo is Twinscroll from Lichtfield Imports.

Yes is possible to convert non billet MD321T or V to the MDX321T Billet


Jura
Thanks Jura,
LM is no good for me then. If I can get a used MD any idea what it costs to make it an MDX ?
Old 19 October 2012 | 09:41 PM
  #12  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by RICHARD J
Thanks Jura,
LM is no good for me then. If I can get a used MD any idea what it costs to make it an MDX ?
Hi Richard

Price for conversion is £295 plus VAT,but for actual prices would ask Turbo Dynamics or Lateral Performance

https://www.scoobynet.com/trader-ann...et-turbos.html

Jura
Old 20 October 2012 | 01:43 AM
  #13  
Berks-Jack's Avatar
Berks-Jack
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Reading
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Based on those two graphs above I would say that the SC42 one is quite a bit better than the MDX321T in the lowdown area. However the graph below (which is mine on a OEM 2ltr JDM with AVCS) is better than both, using the Billet LM450. It has the spool of the SC42 (mine has pretty amazing torque for a 2ltr) and the top end to match the MDX321T.

All peak figures are around the same, but it just highlights what you REALLY need to look at when comparing graphs.

It maybe worth mentioning that the graph of the SC42 is running 20% meth for the 472bhp run. Not sure if Steves figure on the MD is also from running meth?
Old 20 October 2012 | 01:54 AM
  #14  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Berks-Jack
It maybe worth mentioning that the graph of the SC42 is running 20% meth for the 472bhp run. Not sure if Steves figure on the MD is also from running meth?
Yes both running Methanol,Steve run 18% and Ken run 20% IIRC



Jura
Old 20 October 2012 | 02:02 AM
  #15  
Stevesbluewrx's Avatar
Stevesbluewrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Also known as The Gimp
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Yes both running Methanol,Steve run 18% and Ken run 20% IIRC



Jura

This is true. Cheers Jura.

Mine is also using a Sports Cat from RCM.

Going by Shauns graph that deffo picks up lovely torque. I assume this is due to the Twinscreen getting the gasses up quicker etc?

Personally for me the older version MD321T over the MDX321T Billet
is like night and day.

Steve
Old 20 October 2012 | 02:05 AM
  #16  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Stevesbluewrx
This is true. Cheers Jura.

Mine is also using a Sports Cat from RCM.

Going by Shauns graph that deffo picks up lovely torque. I assume this is due to the Twinscreen getting the gasses up quicker etc?

Personally for me the older version MD321T over the MDX321T Billet
is like night and day.

Steve
Sorry Steve,Oh I forgot on the yours RCM Sport CAT,but still think this turbo have potential of 500bhp


Jura
Old 20 October 2012 | 02:07 AM
  #17  
Stevesbluewrx's Avatar
Stevesbluewrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Also known as The Gimp
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Sorry Steve,Oh I forgot on the yours RCM Sport CAT,but still think this turbo have potential of 500bhp


Jura

Agree 100% mate.

Looking at adding some new fuel rails and lines and may pop in a run with race fuel too? Not sure.


Steve
Old 20 October 2012 | 02:28 AM
  #18  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Stevesbluewrx
Agree 100% mate.

Looking at adding some new fuel rails and lines and may pop in a run with race fuel too? Not sure.


Steve

Fuel lines Steve,you are running braided lines or not?

Race fuel is expensive and really not sure if its worth the extra outcome,we are never tried put our wagon on the rollers after NOS mapping/tweaking

As Duncan and Neil said with better heads we should break 500bhp,which we are never tried

You will see how you get on and good luck


Jura
Old 20 October 2012 | 02:44 AM
  #19  
Berks-Jack's Avatar
Berks-Jack
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Reading
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Yes both running Methanol,Steve run 18% and Ken run 20% IIRC



Jura
Old 22 October 2012 | 09:18 AM
  #20  
Stevesbluewrx's Avatar
Stevesbluewrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Also known as The Gimp
Default

Also guys here are graphs for old MD321T over the newer MDX321 (Billet)

MD321 (T)

Name:  453bhpmap.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  31.5 KB


MDX321 (T - BILLET)

Name:  graphpic.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  46.4 KB



Hope this helps.


Steve
Old 22 October 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #21  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

About to replace my MD321H with the MDX321T Hoping it'll spool as well!
The 321H is a good turbo so I'm a little nervous as to what I'm going to find.
Superb condition MD321H (21k miles) for sale soon!

JohnD
Old 22 October 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #22  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
About to replace my MD321H with the MDX321T Hoping it'll spool as well!
The 321H is a good turbo so I'm a little nervous as to what I'm going to find.
Superb condition MD321H (21k miles) for sale soon!

JohnD
John, Have you considered a billet conversion on your current turbo?
Old 22 October 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #23  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Originally Posted by RICHARD J
John, Have you considered a billet conversion on your current turbo?
To be honest, no! I had almost settled on the SC42 but wondered how much more it would give, over what I've already got. I was also told that the billet 321T was now fast spooling enough for the 2 litre with VVT It would also be a bit more 'future proof' should the lure of a 2.1 and multi maps etc become too much for me!

JohnD
Old 22 October 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #24  
chloe123's Avatar
chloe123
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: manchester
Default

Im interested in your md321h how much
Old 22 October 2012 | 07:32 PM
  #25  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
From: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
About to replace my MD321H with the MDX321T Hoping it'll spool as well!
The 321H is a good turbo so I'm a little nervous as to what I'm going to find.
Superb condition MD321H (21k miles) for sale soon!

JohnD
John we are run MDX321T on our 2.1L and has been spotless,we are loved this turbo and spool up has been great

MD321H is great turbo too,mainly on WRX or classic



Jura
Old 22 October 2012 | 11:19 PM
  #26  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Originally Posted by chloe123
Im interested in your md321h how much
I need to get a bit of advice on prices etc I should know a bit more after Wed. when the swop and map are being done.

JohnD
Old 23 October 2012 | 01:37 AM
  #27  
chloe123's Avatar
chloe123
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: manchester
Default

Ok thats fine keep me
Posted
Old 23 October 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #28  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

I'm a huge fan of both the SC42 and SC46.
Used them aplenty on 2.1 strokers and they always deliver the goods.
Old 23 October 2012 | 09:38 AM
  #29  
sprigeteer's Avatar
sprigeteer
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 868
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
I'm a huge fan of both the SC42 and SC46.
Used them aplenty on 2.1 strokers and they always deliver the goods.


Sc46, 2.1 Stroker, Alca Tek, by Engine Tuner, V-power:

Name:  Map.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  149.9 KB
Old 23 October 2012 | 02:04 PM
  #30  
RICHARD J's Avatar
RICHARD J
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

Is the SC46 more laggy on a 2L without AVCS? My mapper has advised me towards the SC42 but has said the MDX321T would be suitable.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.