remap problem fmic
#7
Trending Topics
#13
Doesn't af use that deltadash mapping?
And as we all no if on rollers depends on whose etc etc was bonnet up last time is air filter not getting fed same amount of cold air etc etc
What power you at? Ie do you need fmic ? What model and year engine/ car if standard?
And as we all no if on rollers depends on whose etc etc was bonnet up last time is air filter not getting fed same amount of cold air etc etc
What power you at? Ie do you need fmic ? What model and year engine/ car if standard?
Last edited by wrx9181; 12 September 2013 at 06:48 PM. Reason: Added bits ;)
#17
It'll say he name on the sheet he gives you budd
I'm not saying there not acurite btw as af is the man but I'd think about that before I started to spend more cash!
How does the car drive? It will be slightly laggyer if (that's a word )
I'm not saying there not acurite btw as af is the man but I'd think about that before I started to spend more cash!
How does the car drive? It will be slightly laggyer if (that's a word )
#18
same car , same mapper , diff intercooler and lower power output.
clearly the fmic is the weak link ??
dont think it matters what the actual figure is,the fact that its lower than previous figure from same car and same mapper is the problem.
speak to japspeed mate imho ?
#22
When the mapper said the fuelling was ok was he comparing it with previous figures obtained with the TMIC or just as a general statement when mapping with the new IC?
If he found that it needed less fuel than before then it would follow that the airflow was down and consequently, lower power result.
I use a Japspeed FMIC but mapping was done in conjunction with a bigger turbo so no before and after figures could be compared. It's accepted that the FMIC will increase lag over the TMIC but once stable will it actually FLOW as much air as the top mount? Are there any comparative figures available?
It's said that once you aim for over, say 400bhp, you should consider a FMIC and it's just to control charge temps but not increase airflow. With all else unchanged, it doesn't surprise me that you see a power drop but 25 bhp does seem rather a lot!
JohnD
If he found that it needed less fuel than before then it would follow that the airflow was down and consequently, lower power result.
I use a Japspeed FMIC but mapping was done in conjunction with a bigger turbo so no before and after figures could be compared. It's accepted that the FMIC will increase lag over the TMIC but once stable will it actually FLOW as much air as the top mount? Are there any comparative figures available?
It's said that once you aim for over, say 400bhp, you should consider a FMIC and it's just to control charge temps but not increase airflow. With all else unchanged, it doesn't surprise me that you see a power drop but 25 bhp does seem rather a lot!
JohnD
#23
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 11
From: Hamilton scotland
Ok guys took the car to have the intercooler system pressure tested its mapped for 1.5bar but it started toleak at 0.8bar not japspeed fault joiners not tightened up correctly will this be the problem
#24
#28
I would yes this will cost you loose at bhp/torque side
I would speak with Alyn@AS Performance about the Murray clamps which are made for high boost applications
Hopefully you will get this sorted
Jura