Harvey trick up pipe or RCM Venturi up pipe
#1
Harvey trick up pipe or RCM Venturi up pipe
I have a 2.5 with an sc46 going on it, complete with tubular headers. Question is which up pipe to go for? Havery trick up pipe or the RCM Venturi up pipe?
Heard good things about the Harvey item, question is are the gains (if any) noticeable? More to the point is it worth the extra outlay of cash?
Joe
Heard good things about the Harvey item, question is are the gains (if any) noticeable? More to the point is it worth the extra outlay of cash?
Joe
#3
Your goin to have people pitching for both sides with this 1
.. Besides that in mind , yes , it's important
& will make a noticeable differance in spool
... Whichever you decide , the cash outlay is worth it
If you don't
It's like having a dog with 3 legs
They can still run
Just not as well
.. Besides that in mind , yes , it's important
& will make a noticeable differance in spool
... Whichever you decide , the cash outlay is worth it
If you don't
It's like having a dog with 3 legs
They can still run
Just not as well
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Trying to pull a 10 second 1/4 mile running a standard 2.0ltr engine...
The Harvey uppipe without a doubt,i have one fitted to mine and i personally dont think the car would have made the power it has or spooled the way it does without it.
I had the exact same uppipe fitted along with a Harvey smith ported 18g turbo and that made 385bhp at 1.5bar on v-power only,again this wouldn't have been possible without the uppipe imho.
I had the exact same uppipe fitted along with a Harvey smith ported 18g turbo and that made 385bhp at 1.5bar on v-power only,again this wouldn't have been possible without the uppipe imho.
Last edited by WhiteWagonMan; 29 January 2014 at 12:37 PM.
#5
As above. Harvey was a great friend, and I've seen some of the R&D that went into his trick up-pipe.
Mine is a 2.5 running an HS TD05 20g...it spools to 1 bar at 2800 rpm. 'nuff said.
Mine is a 2.5 running an HS TD05 20g...it spools to 1 bar at 2800 rpm. 'nuff said.
#7
Another vote for the Harvey up pipe here. I've been running an SC46 on my 2.5 for nearly 2 years and i thought the spool was pretty good however a few months back I had the up pipe and headers replaced and couldn't believe the difference it made.
Well worth the money IMO
Well worth the money IMO
Trending Topics
#8
Harvey spent alot of time fettling my car.... in his back garden some of the time
Consequently - I have a Harvey pipe with a MD321T+ (closer to V than a T). For a big turbo it spools quickly.
So a thumb up for the Harvey pipe here
I guess contact Alyn at AS Peformance - to see what he has
Consequently - I have a Harvey pipe with a MD321T+ (closer to V than a T). For a big turbo it spools quickly.
So a thumb up for the Harvey pipe here
I guess contact Alyn at AS Peformance - to see what he has
#9
the "venturi" style do have a place but you wouldn't see much (if any benefit) until at extreme power levels, the "harvey smith" trick pipe will allow better spool/response and hence a greater spread of torque in general
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM