Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

...following on from Proper Charlies method Statements...craneage bods please..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 February 2004, 02:35 PM
  #1  
mj
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
mj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The poliotical wing of Chip Sengravy.
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb ...following on from Proper Charlies method Statements...craneage bods please..

I noticed a few people involved in lifting on PC's thread....hope you can shed some light..

I seem to be getting told different stories with regard to Loler craneage regulations, contract lifts, and AP's.

I have always been under the impression that in the last 3 or so years, ALL lifting operations are to be on a contract lift basis - in the most we have hired cranes on this basis, however on very straightforward/open lifts we just hire and sling&signal ourselves as we have the CITB tickets for this.

I have just spoken to a crane rep/AP from a large hire company that tells me I do NOT have to hire a crane as a contract lift, as long as I submit myself as an AP, designate or be a lift supervisor etc, and produce to the hirer MS&RA 48 hrs prior to the lift.

kind of echo'd her by something I found on the net:

In April 2002, the HSE (Yorkshire & North East Region) issued a statement expressing concern over the number of incidents involving mobile cranes. The statement pointed out the "strict legal requirements to appoint a competent person to plan all lifting operations and a supervisor to ensure that the lift is carried out in accordance with the prepared plan, in BS7121 - referred to as the 'Appointed Person' and 'Crane Supervisor'". The CPA responded with a notice to all of their Crane Hire members stating that they should question the Hirer and satisfy themselves that the Hirer had a named Appointed Person who would be responsible for the planning for the Lifting Operation and that a suitable and effective Method Statement & Risk Assessment covering the whole Operation was in place. If the Hirer could not answer the questions satisfactorily , then the hire should be declined. In June 2002, the Principal Specialist Inspector of the HSE's Construction Division responded favourably to this notice, in a sense making this a code of practice acceptable throughout the industry.
Now the question is - can I appoint myself legally as an AP?

I have been involved with craneage for 11 years - we install diesel generators ( they don't climb off the lorry themselves ) for the last 4 years I have been writing MS&RA for lifting ops, and for the last 3 I have held the slingers ticket.


I am looking to go on an AP course anyway, my question is can I do it now with my experience?

cheers,

Mike.
Old 26 February 2004, 04:09 PM
  #2  
SirFozzalot
Scooby Regular
 
SirFozzalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 19,633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Hi mj,

I am a qualified AP for a mobile crane hire company and technically you shouldn't appoint yourself as an AP unless you have completed and passed the 3 day AP course or can prove satisfactorily to the HSE (in the case of inspection or accident/incident) that you are competent to be appointed as the AP. However, as with most regulations it comes down to how you interprete the legislation and how you can prove you are competent.

BS7121: part 1:1989 (safe use of cranes) states that "The Appointed Person should have adequate training and experience to enable these duties to be carried out competently"

BS7121: part 3:2000 goes into a little bit more detail as to what the AP is responsible for.

At present the qualification of "Appointed Person" isn't a CITB/CTA (now replaced with CPCS) catergory, only CITB approved, but from April '04 the Appointed Person qualification will be recognised and will be added to your CPCS card (CTA/CITB) along with slinger/signaller etc. For it to be added to your card you will have to complete the relevant course and obtain a certificate of training.
Hope this helps mate, if you need any more info let me know....and if you need a crane

Last edited by SirFozzalot; 26 February 2004 at 04:10 PM.
Old 26 February 2004, 04:23 PM
  #3  
mj
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
mj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The poliotical wing of Chip Sengravy.
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cheers Sir Fozz....


YHPM
Old 27 February 2004, 05:48 PM
  #4  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

IMO "competence" is one of those vague terms that is hard to define. Some tasks have rigidly defined meanings for competence. e.g. to drive a car unaccompanied you must pass a driving test. that is the test for competence for that activity. with regard to the crane or lift controller type situation, on one hand it is nice to be able to point to a certificate from a training organisation and say "hey look - i'm competent" but OTOH if you can supply other evidence of your competence, be it experience, on the job training or whatever, the person questioning would have to stick their neck out to say that they did not accept that. some organisations may have a defined criteria - e.g you will only be considered competent in this activity once you have completed a course using this sylabus, and been mentored for x no, of hours or whatever.

clear as mud, eh?

Last edited by ProperCharlie; 27 February 2004 at 05:49 PM.
Old 27 February 2004, 11:07 PM
  #5  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All boils down to Health And Safety At Work Act, which is where LOLER and many other regs stem from. Absolutely jam packed full of phrases like "as far as reasonably practicable", it's a bit woolly where reasonably practicable ends. Whilst following an HSE Approved Code Of Practice(s) associated with the work you're doing is a good way of demonstrating you've done reaonably practicable, you can't actually be prosecuted for not following the ACOP - as long as you can demonstrate (proove) that you have taken equivalent or better measures.

Generally, you have to take the line that if there is an accident, the HSE, lawyers etc will ask the question. If you have justification that you really believe will stand up in criminal court as having taken all reasonable steps that an average person could have foreseen, then fine. Health and Safety is pretty unique in British criminal law in that the burden of proof is fairly well on you to prove your innocence rather than someone to prove your guilt.

Under common (civil) law, you also need to demonstrate that you have fulfilled your "duty of care" to both other workers, general public, i.e. pretty much everybody that could be effected and want to sue you!

Working (running largish jobs) in a fairly tightly regulated and potentially hazardous industry, there's one other bit of advice that I'd give that I can't understand why more people don't. Try talking to your local HSE and ask their opinion. From our experience, they're quite human and approachable if you haven't just caused an accident, and will give advice. They'd rather help prevent accidents than prosecute people for causing them. Goes without saying it's wiser to ask them before you do something rather than when you're already doing it.

I know that's a bit generic Health and Safety rather than specific craneage, but hope it helps?
Old 28 February 2004, 11:31 AM
  #6  
mj
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
mj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The poliotical wing of Chip Sengravy.
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your input here and PM's chaps, much appreciated.


I think for peace of mind I'll take the course soon - my local Ainscough do the 3 day course for £525 - with the price of Contract lifts nowadays it should pay for itself in 1 job

cheers,

Mike.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Davalar
General Technical
19
30 September 2015 08:54 PM
STERNRITTER
ScoobyNet General
5
29 September 2015 09:05 PM
Bean592
ICE
10
25 September 2015 01:03 PM
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
16 September 2015 08:07 PM



Quick Reply: ...following on from Proper Charlies method Statements...craneage bods please..



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM.