Should UK ban smoking in public?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Should UK ban smoking in public?
It'll be interesting to see what happens in Ireland now that smoking has been banned in all public places.
Customers of pubs etc will face a £2000 fine if caught flouting this new law.
As most people are non smokers I think it'll succeed. Be nice to come home from the pub not smelling like a stinking old ashtray as well.
Chip (reformed smoker)
Customers of pubs etc will face a £2000 fine if caught flouting this new law.
As most people are non smokers I think it'll succeed. Be nice to come home from the pub not smelling like a stinking old ashtray as well.
Chip (reformed smoker)
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Well I am a smoker, hopefully to be giving up soon, but I dont like the way things are always being banned, and choices limited.
Smoking does bother me sometimes, I wont do it in restaurants mostly, or when i am around non smokers, and I think I am a considerate smoker, but it does really gall me when a freedom is removed.
They should ban alcohol as well, so the ********* on Wednesday night walking past my house at 3am singing "we're gonna win the league" and waking me up could be fined
I know the anti smoking lot will now start going on about "I dont want to breathe your smoke", yadda yadda. This can be applied to so many things. As I say ban alcohol, ban petrol so no-one has to breath your car fumes, ban music so I dont have to listen to other playing "their" music, the list goes on.
Not sure what will happen in Ireland - its allegedly banned in NYC, which worried me last year when i went, but people were just smoking outside - everywhere you went, people having **** outside.
Before the anti lot join in, bear this in mind - if everyone in the UK gave up tomorrow, the country would fall to its knees, you can rant on for as long as poss about the NHS paying for smokers treatment, but the tax the Gov't get from smokers far outweighs that.
Smoking does bother me sometimes, I wont do it in restaurants mostly, or when i am around non smokers, and I think I am a considerate smoker, but it does really gall me when a freedom is removed.
They should ban alcohol as well, so the ********* on Wednesday night walking past my house at 3am singing "we're gonna win the league" and waking me up could be fined
I know the anti smoking lot will now start going on about "I dont want to breathe your smoke", yadda yadda. This can be applied to so many things. As I say ban alcohol, ban petrol so no-one has to breath your car fumes, ban music so I dont have to listen to other playing "their" music, the list goes on.
Not sure what will happen in Ireland - its allegedly banned in NYC, which worried me last year when i went, but people were just smoking outside - everywhere you went, people having **** outside.
Before the anti lot join in, bear this in mind - if everyone in the UK gave up tomorrow, the country would fall to its knees, you can rant on for as long as poss about the NHS paying for smokers treatment, but the tax the Gov't get from smokers far outweighs that.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not let the business owners choose whether they want to be a no smoking or smoking allowed premises? Problem solved...
I'd rather own a pub or whatever full of smokers than one half full of non smokers.
And while were at it Im with DW, why dont they solve the huge asthma problem the UK has by banning all motorised transport.
I'd rather own a pub or whatever full of smokers than one half full of non smokers.
And while were at it Im with DW, why dont they solve the huge asthma problem the UK has by banning all motorised transport.
#14
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by currymonster
Yep smoking serves no useful purpose, anywhere where the smoke might reach someone else it should be banned, cal
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I'd like to see it banned.
Nothing worse than getting after a night out with your clothes and hair absolutely stinking of smoke.
Smokers can use the big room (outside) to smoke.
Nothing worse than getting after a night out with your clothes and hair absolutely stinking of smoke.
Smokers can use the big room (outside) to smoke.
#19
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
should have the choice!!
Chip.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seeing that passive smoking costs the NHS dearly, as well as causing death & misery for thousands, why should the minority of the population that smoke inflict their filthy habit on the majority that don't?
And it's not about smokers' civil liberties being eroded either. After all, they have a choice of going outside to smoke. At present, the non-smoking majority don't have any choice but to inhale second hand carcinogens....
And it's not about smokers' civil liberties being eroded either. After all, they have a choice of going outside to smoke. At present, the non-smoking majority don't have any choice but to inhale second hand carcinogens....
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Should UK ban smoking in public?
#23
Scooby Regular
I smoke but would love to see it banned.
Stinks and there is no way that others should have to breath it in and have their clothes stinking too
As for the stupid arguments like
... then do it in their own feckin space and not in other peoples faces.... surely even the most blinded smoker can see the sense in that
Stinks and there is no way that others should have to breath it in and have their clothes stinking too
As for the stupid arguments like
Maybe to you it doesnt, some people enjoy it and should have the choice!!
#26
Scooby Senior
I wouldn't mind seeing it banned. Having to go outside makes smoking more of an occasion and gives time to converse with fellow sinners. Mobile phones should be banned at the same time.
#28
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by STi wanna Subaru
You only enjoy it because you're a drug addict.
Having said that, i am giving up for health reasons - too much to live for these days to risk it.
No-one will ever win this argument, but to completely cut off 1 group is wrong IMO.
Surely things would work with a smoking and non smoking section in pubs etc - that way everyone wins. By just cutting off one section of people what does that achieve.
I can see the point that non-smokers make, and tbh I dont smoke a great deal, and as I said I am a considerate smoker. I am more annoyed at the fact that things are starting to be "banned" everywhere.
#29
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by SiPie
... then do it in their own feckin space and not in other peoples faces.... surely even the most blinded smoker can see the sense in that
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no argument. Banning smoking isn't cutting anyone out; it's making them go elsewhere to pollute themselves and leave the non-smokers with clean air.
The smokers' argument is no stronger than a group of people who demand to burn tyres in their gardens.........
The smokers' argument is no stronger than a group of people who demand to burn tyres in their gardens.........