FTAO anyone who's been to court for speeding
#1
FTAO anyone who's been to court for speeding
I was just wondering how long you had to wait from returning the NIP to actually receiving your court date.
as its now been over 11 months for meand I'm still waiting!!
I can't believe that I've got away it,but to ban/fine someone nearly a year after the event is ridiculous I think,or not?
cheers,Jon
as its now been over 11 months for meand I'm still waiting!!
I can't believe that I've got away it,but to ban/fine someone nearly a year after the event is ridiculous I think,or not?
cheers,Jon
Last edited by Elmer Fudpucker; 27 June 2004 at 11:22 AM.
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
From: Walking the fine line between genius and insanity
As I understand it you must recieve notification of date of court appearance within six months of the date of the offence, assuming that there has been no undue delay in issuing the NIP (eg, change of address, so difficulty in tracking you down etc). Outside that six month period the case cannot proceed.
Sounds to me as though you have got away with it
Gareth
Sounds to me as though you have got away with it
Gareth
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
From: Walking the fine line between genius and insanity
I'm basing the above info on advice I'd asked for on 5ive-O.
The response that I got was that the case proceedings must be instigated within six months of the date of the offence. This meant that so long as you recieved your court summons within that six month period, the case would proceed, even if the court date was then a few months later (ie perhaps 8 months after the date of the offence).
As mentioned all this assumes there was no delay in issueing the court summons. If the NIP had been issued at the time of the offence (ie. by being stopped by a police officer), or issued within 14 days of the offence (ie. perhaps caught on a revenue camera) and there were no other delays to hold up the proceedings, six months is the limit.
If your case now goes to court I would have thought the magistrates would just dismiss it.
All this is mentioned in good faith, so please no legal comeback on me cos you said in court "well GarethE said"
Hope you get it sorted....prepared to bow to police/solicitors/magistrates or people with direct experience of this, who are better informed than me
The response that I got was that the case proceedings must be instigated within six months of the date of the offence. This meant that so long as you recieved your court summons within that six month period, the case would proceed, even if the court date was then a few months later (ie perhaps 8 months after the date of the offence).
As mentioned all this assumes there was no delay in issueing the court summons. If the NIP had been issued at the time of the offence (ie. by being stopped by a police officer), or issued within 14 days of the offence (ie. perhaps caught on a revenue camera) and there were no other delays to hold up the proceedings, six months is the limit.
If your case now goes to court I would have thought the magistrates would just dismiss it.
All this is mentioned in good faith, so please no legal comeback on me cos you said in court "well GarethE said"
Hope you get it sorted....prepared to bow to police/solicitors/magistrates or people with direct experience of this, who are better informed than me
Last edited by GarethE; 27 June 2004 at 01:48 PM. Reason: spelling, again !
#6
Papers have to be laid with the court within 6 months. You could phone the court in the area of the offence and ask if papers had been laid in your name. Once papers are laid then they can take their time actually getting you to court but you should see a summons within 6 months of the offence. I am assuming from your comments that either you were going not guilty or else you were facing a ban and so it had to go to court?
However, in this instance I'd guess that you have escaped. In short what GarethE says accurately describes the situation.
As likely as not you will find that they have screwed up so badly they have decided not to proceed. Usually in such circumstances they proceed anyhow in the hope that the victim will go guilty and they will get away with it. This is why you should always demand the disclosure of all evidence etc. etc.
However, in this instance I'd guess that you have escaped. In short what GarethE says accurately describes the situation.
As likely as not you will find that they have screwed up so badly they have decided not to proceed. Usually in such circumstances they proceed anyhow in the hope that the victim will go guilty and they will get away with it. This is why you should always demand the disclosure of all evidence etc. etc.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM