Perhaps a mistake, but quite right too......how does one qualify to be taken serious when exhibiting such a mundane & humdrum piece of "art".

I assume said "artist" has to have a history of "serious" art before rubbish like this can be taken seriously by the pretentious art world??

Puzzling.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertain...ts/3604278.stm

 

Oh, and surely.....

...means that the original 'piece' no longer exists, and surely diminishes the appeal?

 

"Why don't people try to understand the singing of birds?
People love the night, a flower, everything that surrounds them without trying to understand them.
But painting - that they must understand"

Pablo Picasso

These "artists" get away with rubbish (sorry ) like this because the Emperors new clothes syndrome. None of the "art experts" will ever admit they don't "understand the piece".

 

I think that story is classic and shows the real worth of that kind of "art".

Les