Im being sued
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Im being sued
I crashed my car begining of last month on a roundabout. I was going straight on and the car on my left wa turning right. So my right of way. I got a witness who agreed it was my right of way. Both myself and the other driver said we were ok at the scene of the accident. My car went to the bodyshop the next day and i got a courtesy car. My insurers said they were holding the other driver at fault and they were yet to hear from them. I sent off my claim form and again my insurers were waiting to hear from them. Damage to my MY00 PPP consisted of light damage to offside wing headlight, foglight and surrounding bumper area, plus corner of bonnet. Im unsure as to the extent of the other car, altho it was a H reg Mazda 323 so not worth alot. My car is now back to how it was before the crash.
I received a letter tonight from her solicitors headed Personal Injury Claim. They say they are holding myself at fault and that it was clear that im at fault. They say if i dont fill in and return their form then they will start court proceedings.
I never took out legal protection with my insurance policy and as im a member of the Amicus union my dad suggested i contact them for legal help. Needless to say im not amused!!
I received a letter tonight from her solicitors headed Personal Injury Claim. They say they are holding myself at fault and that it was clear that im at fault. They say if i dont fill in and return their form then they will start court proceedings.
I never took out legal protection with my insurance policy and as im a member of the Amicus union my dad suggested i contact them for legal help. Needless to say im not amused!!
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i hate all the crap that goes with crashing
sumbody once drove his van over my car while i was sitting in it
he then tried to claim i drove into him??
i was parked outside my mates house with the engine off and the keys removed, it took ages to sort that one out
#3
It's the chav in the other car trying it on, I would take legal advice but I will tell you what happened to a mate of mine.
My mate, we'll call him Joe, was driving through a busy junction, that has a pub on each side of the road, the road is 4 lanes wide (due to filter lanes at the traffic lights). Both of the pubs have loads of people outside them during the summer months. Anyway, as Joe went through the traffic lights (which were on green) a guy darted out fro the crowd and Joe ran him over (no chance to react). Police called, agreed it was the pedestrians fault (due to roughly 100 eyewitnesses telling them that).
Over the next 4 years, the pedestrian tried it on with 5 different "no win, no fee" solicitors, Joe stuck to his guns that he wasn't at fault at all, eventually it went to court.
The judge decided that the pedestrian was completely at fault and was "as far from a credible plaintiff as it is possible to be".
The moral here is: if you beleive you're right, stick with it and you can't get tripped up on your story as long as it's the truth.
My mate, we'll call him Joe, was driving through a busy junction, that has a pub on each side of the road, the road is 4 lanes wide (due to filter lanes at the traffic lights). Both of the pubs have loads of people outside them during the summer months. Anyway, as Joe went through the traffic lights (which were on green) a guy darted out fro the crowd and Joe ran him over (no chance to react). Police called, agreed it was the pedestrians fault (due to roughly 100 eyewitnesses telling them that).
Over the next 4 years, the pedestrian tried it on with 5 different "no win, no fee" solicitors, Joe stuck to his guns that he wasn't at fault at all, eventually it went to court.
The judge decided that the pedestrian was completely at fault and was "as far from a credible plaintiff as it is possible to be".
The moral here is: if you beleive you're right, stick with it and you can't get tripped up on your story as long as it's the truth.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has the other drivers insurance paid out ? If so, they have admitted liability I would have thought. If that is the case, throw the letter in the bin.
Ian
Ian
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
16vmarc
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
#6
My dad crashed into the back of somebody at a roundabout once, it was her fault as she'd committed herself to entering the roundabout but decided to slam on as a bike came round (big roundabout with trees in the middle) Not much damage to the cars, just broken lights, dad wasn't arsed cos he was in an old Volvo 440 both parties agreed everything was ok and went on about their business. Dad went back later on with a camera and took pictures of the glass on the road just in case because this would show that she had stopped on the roundabout. The b*tch then tried to claim whiplash, extensive damage to car etc. It was only the photos that sorted it out. He always keeps a disposable camera in the glovebox now just in case.
#7
Second the disposable camera idea. Been carrying one for several years now. Try and keep it in the sealed package which will help protect the film while in the continual heat/cold of the glovebox
Joolz
Joolz
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Puff The Magic Wagon!
16vmarc
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
Even i though i dont have legal protection??
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sign all your assets over too me including house car etc and declare your self bankrupt
Then when you go court they will see you dont have 2 pennies to scratch your ***** with so theyl take pitty on u.
Meanwile il be thrashing the **** of your scoob taking good care of it, for a year or so for you
Then when you go court they will see you dont have 2 pennies to scratch your ***** with so theyl take pitty on u.
Meanwile il be thrashing the **** of your scoob taking good care of it, for a year or so for you
#10
Originally Posted by Puff The Magic Wagon!
16vmarc
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
That is STANDARD PRACTICE by insurers upon receipt of a notification from their client that they were in an accident.
Don't do ANYTHING other than send it to YOUR insurers immediately & they will deal with it on your behalf.
At its cheapest, you have got 3rd party insurance which means that your insurers are responsible for dealing with any claims made against you - that includes costs, thats what you pay for.
Legal expense insurance is for you claiming off the other party.
As I said, do nothing but forward the letter unanswered to your insurers to deal with on your behalf. Do not worrry yourself.
Do not, under any circumstances, write to the solicitors yourself attempting to answer/counter the accusations (no matter how incensed you feel!) or even acknowledge receipt.
In short, don't worry about it - your insurers will deal with everything on your behalf.
HTH
NB If you haven't already told your insurers that, at the time of the accident, the other party confirmed that he/she was not injured, do mention it in your covering letter.
#11
Originally Posted by 16vmarc
Even i though i dont have legal protection??
In this context, legal expenses/protection would only be relevant if it was you that had sustained the "injury" and wanted/needed to sue the other driver.
If a motorist is sued for a personal injury claim it is his/her motor insurers that will defend the action (and meet the costs). If the claim is successful, then the insurers will also meet the cost of any damages that are awarded.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Question for you Marc
What are you being insured against when you purchase insurance?
Answer - You are being insured against OTHER PARTIES making a claim against you for loss or damage caused by your actions. It is an insurance policy. The insurers assess the risk you as a citizen pose to their profitability and charge you accordingly based on that probability. They then trust that you are the super driver you say you are and that you don't have an accident.
If you do have an accident, then they have lost on their bet and foot the bill. The minimum that the law in this country allows for is Act insurance, which is 3rd party insurance, so if you drive into/over someone & its your fault, then they are able to claim off your insurer. Bear in mind that your accident might leave a 16yr old child prodigy as a cerebrally damaged paraplegic who will require 24/7 care for the rest of his life - that claim is worth millions & is likely to have a 4-5 yr law battle (costs). You can't be expected to pay for that - thats what your insurance is for.
Legal expense insurance is essentially (better description this) for assisting you in claiming your uninsured losses off a 3rd party. By this I mean the costs of your claim that are not covered by your insurers - hire car, days off work, loss of amenity etc. Mainly used for tangible & non-tangible material items.
However, if you have a personal injury, then go to a Personal Injury specialist solicitor and they will sign you up to a no win no fee agreement & will at the same time look after your other uninsured losses as described above.
HTH
What are you being insured against when you purchase insurance?
Answer - You are being insured against OTHER PARTIES making a claim against you for loss or damage caused by your actions. It is an insurance policy. The insurers assess the risk you as a citizen pose to their profitability and charge you accordingly based on that probability. They then trust that you are the super driver you say you are and that you don't have an accident.
If you do have an accident, then they have lost on their bet and foot the bill. The minimum that the law in this country allows for is Act insurance, which is 3rd party insurance, so if you drive into/over someone & its your fault, then they are able to claim off your insurer. Bear in mind that your accident might leave a 16yr old child prodigy as a cerebrally damaged paraplegic who will require 24/7 care for the rest of his life - that claim is worth millions & is likely to have a 4-5 yr law battle (costs). You can't be expected to pay for that - thats what your insurance is for.
Legal expense insurance is essentially (better description this) for assisting you in claiming your uninsured losses off a 3rd party. By this I mean the costs of your claim that are not covered by your insurers - hire car, days off work, loss of amenity etc. Mainly used for tangible & non-tangible material items.
However, if you have a personal injury, then go to a Personal Injury specialist solicitor and they will sign you up to a no win no fee agreement & will at the same time look after your other uninsured losses as described above.
HTH
#13
I'm assuming that the other insurers have paid out for the repairs and that by implication the other driver has admitted fault. I'm confused though because in the highway code (circa 1987 admittedly) it says that whoever's on the outside of a roundabout has right of way. I know this because I was asked the hypothetical question on my test, "If you're on a roundabout, nearest the centre and you reach the point at which you want to leave the roundabout and you see a vehicle approaching in the left lane, even if they have used the incorrect lane around the roundabout, who has right of way?" The answer is them. I said something to the effect that if I was using the correct lane and they were in the wrong lane I'd have right of way but I'd let them by to prevent an accident. this is technically the wrong answer though and the instructor told me to re-read my highway code.
Oh, I still passed... lol
Oh, I still passed... lol
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: a Little place with Knocks in ....
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to echo what's been quite rightly said already ...
It's standard letter stuff dont worry, just send the letter to your insurer.
I would also enclose a note to your insurer stating that under no circumstance should they settle the third parties claim without your consent, this way you should obviously be kept aware of any intentions.
Chris
It's standard letter stuff dont worry, just send the letter to your insurer.
I would also enclose a note to your insurer stating that under no circumstance should they settle the third parties claim without your consent, this way you should obviously be kept aware of any intentions.
Chris
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bangor, Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can probably find a thread on here by me which discussed the same thing that has happened to you. in my case it was total bolloxs and although the letter scared me i just ignored them and all went away. they just try it on - mine even asked for me to provide a settlement amount or something to that effect but didn't state an amount. give it to your insurers is good advice and be adament with them that you are not at fault and they should not pay out.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
solicitors do try it on don't they?
I had a great one years ago. Standard crossroads-like roandabout, dual carriageway crosses a minor road (I think it was the second roundabout on St. Helen's Linkway if you've come from the M62 if anyone cares) I enter the roundabout in the right hand lane intending to take the second exit.
The minor road has two lanes at the point where it enters (1st exit, relative to where I entered from) and a large blue pick up truck is in the right hand lane. I get a bad feeling about this, ease off slightly and the pickup truck shoots past inches away from trking my front bumper off.
I continue towards my intended exit and a chav mother in a sierra (with 4 kids on the back seat and one in the front!) who was in the left hand lane of the minor road buries herself in my front wing having assumed it's safe to go because the pickup truck went, therefore looking is not required. (hint: If you must use the car to your right as a shield, at least keep up with the bloody thing)
Anyway, during the course of a claim, I get a letter with wording like "my client holds the driver of <my car> entirely at fault for the accident but in order to avoid costly legal action is prepared to accept 50/50 responsibility. I send it off to my insurer telling them no bloody way it was her fault and her solicitor gives in almost immediately.
I get the cost of my repairs and hire car sorted. My passenger took separate legal action against her and was limping around work for months, though the limp would change foot from time to time. I hate people who do that as they put your insurance up.
I had a great one years ago. Standard crossroads-like roandabout, dual carriageway crosses a minor road (I think it was the second roundabout on St. Helen's Linkway if you've come from the M62 if anyone cares) I enter the roundabout in the right hand lane intending to take the second exit.
The minor road has two lanes at the point where it enters (1st exit, relative to where I entered from) and a large blue pick up truck is in the right hand lane. I get a bad feeling about this, ease off slightly and the pickup truck shoots past inches away from trking my front bumper off.
I continue towards my intended exit and a chav mother in a sierra (with 4 kids on the back seat and one in the front!) who was in the left hand lane of the minor road buries herself in my front wing having assumed it's safe to go because the pickup truck went, therefore looking is not required. (hint: If you must use the car to your right as a shield, at least keep up with the bloody thing)
Anyway, during the course of a claim, I get a letter with wording like "my client holds the driver of <my car> entirely at fault for the accident but in order to avoid costly legal action is prepared to accept 50/50 responsibility. I send it off to my insurer telling them no bloody way it was her fault and her solicitor gives in almost immediately.
I get the cost of my repairs and hire car sorted. My passenger took separate legal action against her and was limping around work for months, though the limp would change foot from time to time. I hate people who do that as they put your insurance up.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Daughter had a similar case, the people at fault go to one of these (or several one after the other until some on picks it up) no win no fee solicitors. They will chase anything. You sadly have to go to a good solicitor too. ....................
#20
as above - pass everything to your insurer and don't worry about it. They will foot the bill - this is exactly what the third party bit covers you against. If it comes to a court hearing they would usually provide solicitors/barristers of their own.
Unfortunately, in this case I don't think it will come to court. The two insurance companies will more than likely agree 50/50 liability, as you should both have been watching out for other vehicles - doesn't matter if you have 'right of way' when you are changing lanes or changing direction
Unfortunately, in this case I don't think it will come to court. The two insurance companies will more than likely agree 50/50 liability, as you should both have been watching out for other vehicles - doesn't matter if you have 'right of way' when you are changing lanes or changing direction
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast bloke
as above - pass everything to your insurer and don't worry about it. They will foot the bill - this is exactly what the third party bit covers you against. If it comes to a court hearing they would usually provide solicitors/barristers of their own.
Unfortunately, in this case I don't think it will come to court. The two insurance companies will more than likely agree 50/50 liability, as you should both have been watching out for other vehicles - doesn't matter if you have 'right of way' when you are changing lanes or changing direction
Unfortunately, in this case I don't think it will come to court. The two insurance companies will more than likely agree 50/50 liability, as you should both have been watching out for other vehicles - doesn't matter if you have 'right of way' when you are changing lanes or changing direction
Good luck.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by STi wanna Subaru
Agree. I had the same thing happen to me and it went 50/50 even though the other car was going 3/4 of the way round the roundabout in the left hand lane. They had already gone past 2 exits. cost me a fortune in the end.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Pass the letter straight over to you insurers - they will deal with the case on your behalf. Do not respond to the third party's solicitors.
Your insurers have the right to take over the case and "assume your identity" from a legal perspective.
#23
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Phoned my union legal advice line and they told me to fill in the form i have received off her solicitors and send it back. I phoned Tesco and they have told me not to fill in the form and send it directly to them. They told me that they have already told the other insurers that they will be dealng with the claim and not to contact me. they are still waiting to hear from the other insurers as they are yet to decide what they are doing next.
#24
Originally Posted by 16vmarc
Phoned my union legal advice line and they told me to fill in the form i have received off her solicitors and send it back. I phoned Tesco and they have told me not to fill in the form and send it directly to them. They told me that they have already told the other insurers that they will be dealng with the claim and not to contact me. they are still waiting to hear from the other insurers as they are yet to decide what they are doing next.
Just do exactly what Tescos [and everyone on here] has said - send the letter (and any other correspondence you receive subsequently) straight to your insurers.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobybitch
My dad crashed into the back of somebody at a roundabout once, it was her fault as she'd committed herself to entering the roundabout but decided to slam on as a bike came round (big roundabout with trees in the middle) Not much damage to the cars, just broken lights, dad wasn't arsed cos he was in an old Volvo 440 both parties agreed everything was ok and went on about their business. Dad went back later on with a camera and took pictures of the glass on the road just in case because this would show that she had stopped on the roundabout. The b*tch then tried to claim whiplash, extensive damage to car etc. It was only the photos that sorted it out. He always keeps a disposable camera in the glovebox now just in case.
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Yorks, MY03 PPP, now run a Mondeo ST TDCI 06
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same happened to me and it was the other guy that ran the red light. The letter threatened that if I didn't reply they would go to court.
Sent to Direct Line and they handled it all.
Sent to Direct Line and they handled it all.
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by 16vmarc
I crashed my car begining of last month on a roundabout. I was going straight on and the car on my left wa turning right. So my right of way. I got a witness who agreed it was my right of way. Both myself and the other driver said we were ok at the scene of the accident. My car went to the bodyshop the next day and i got a courtesy car. My insurers said they were holding the other driver at fault and they were yet to hear from them. I sent off my claim form and again my insurers were waiting to hear from them. Damage to my MY00 PPP consisted of light damage to offside wing headlight, foglight and surrounding bumper area, plus corner of bonnet. Im unsure as to the extent of the other car, altho it was a H reg Mazda 323 so not worth alot. My car is now back to how it was before the crash.
I received a letter tonight from her solicitors headed Personal Injury Claim. They say they are holding myself at fault and that it was clear that im at fault. They say if i dont fill in and return their form then they will start court proceedings.
I never took out legal protection with my insurance policy and as im a member of the Amicus union my dad suggested i contact them for legal help. Needless to say im not amused!!
I received a letter tonight from her solicitors headed Personal Injury Claim. They say they are holding myself at fault and that it was clear that im at fault. They say if i dont fill in and return their form then they will start court proceedings.
I never took out legal protection with my insurance policy and as im a member of the Amicus union my dad suggested i contact them for legal help. Needless to say im not amused!!
throw it in the bin, you have swapped insurance details so let the insurance company sort it out, plus if you have a witness to the accident who cares, its obvious this is another no win no fee claim, i had a similar thing 3 years ago and thought nothing of it until i started getting letters from another solicitor 6 months ago threatening to sue me if i didnt give them the name of the insurance company they must think im an idiot trying to threaten me, i got a few letter and a few phone calls but nothing registered post so i threw them all in the bin its just turned 3 years since the accident now so in the eyes of the law a claim cannot be made made PMSL he should of made more of an effort to claim when the accident 1st happened
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
always always carry a disposeable camera in your glove box if you do there will be no need to worry about witnesses as the camera never lies they have helped me a couple of time recently, as both peeps hit me and both tried to change there story after the scene but i had photo's to prove i was right