Hamas incharge of Palestine...
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hamas incharge of Palestine...
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...210428,00.html
thats the end of any peace process then. The head of Hamas has stated negotiating with the Jewish state is not on his agenda. The middle east is now going to go down the pan with these loonatics in place and Palestinians are going to suffer massively for voting this lot into power. The Israelis wont hold back now this has happened.
thats the end of any peace process then. The head of Hamas has stated negotiating with the Jewish state is not on his agenda. The middle east is now going to go down the pan with these loonatics in place and Palestinians are going to suffer massively for voting this lot into power. The Israelis wont hold back now this has happened.
#2
I have a lot of sympathy with Palestinians and the opression they suffer but this does seem like a disaster for the peace process.The western governments should really find a way to deal with them though as they are the elected leaders. The IRA managed to seperate Sinn fein and Hamas will have to do the same and find people with a political view on how to get peace rather than just talk about violence.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The Americans and the Europeans say to Hamas: either you have weapons or you enter the legislative council. We say weapons and the legislative council. There is no contradiction between the two. "
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by **************
thats the end of any peace process then. The head of Hamas has stated negotiating with the Jewish state is not on his agenda. The middle east is now going to go down the pan with these loonatics in place and Palestinians are going to suffer massively for voting this lot into power. The Israelis wont hold back now this has happened.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
We say weapons and the legislative council. There is no contradiction between the two. "
#7
i think it's too early to say yet - but they're in & that's that. plus it does bring a perverse kind of clarity to the situation. the palestinian cards are well and truly on the table now - they're inside the political tent and being bolshie, instead of outside setting fire to it.
my gut feeling is that hamas in government will now have to grow up very very quickly: not only do they have to have political and diplomatic discourse with israel and the US (regardless of the grandstanding), they also have to talk with the UN, the EU and many other countries besides. in effect, forcing them to think with their heads instead of simply acting with an AK. the very fact that they are in political power (and out of the shadows) makes their people more visible and more vulnerable to mossad assassination if they simply choose the 'business as usual' option. i'm sure they will realise this.
the pressures they face by reverting to type will, i think, destroy them. these people are dangerous extremists from the terrorist fringe but they are not mad (unlike mahmoud ahmadinejad in iran) and will understand that by achieving legislative power they themselves must undergo fundamental change and adapt to this new environment. it won't happen overnight though and is bound to be bumpy.
remember, menachem begin and moshe dayan once preferred the bullet to the ballot box and they became nation-builders of the jewish state. much will also depend on how tel aviv reacts and who fills the vacuum left by sharon.
call me an optimist but this just might help cut through all the bullsh1t and get arab and jewish eyes firmly on the ball. at last.
my gut feeling is that hamas in government will now have to grow up very very quickly: not only do they have to have political and diplomatic discourse with israel and the US (regardless of the grandstanding), they also have to talk with the UN, the EU and many other countries besides. in effect, forcing them to think with their heads instead of simply acting with an AK. the very fact that they are in political power (and out of the shadows) makes their people more visible and more vulnerable to mossad assassination if they simply choose the 'business as usual' option. i'm sure they will realise this.
the pressures they face by reverting to type will, i think, destroy them. these people are dangerous extremists from the terrorist fringe but they are not mad (unlike mahmoud ahmadinejad in iran) and will understand that by achieving legislative power they themselves must undergo fundamental change and adapt to this new environment. it won't happen overnight though and is bound to be bumpy.
remember, menachem begin and moshe dayan once preferred the bullet to the ballot box and they became nation-builders of the jewish state. much will also depend on how tel aviv reacts and who fills the vacuum left by sharon.
call me an optimist but this just might help cut through all the bullsh1t and get arab and jewish eyes firmly on the ball. at last.
Trending Topics
#9
Let's all be honest now. Unless you have family there, who really gives a ****e about the middle east - I mean "really".
Quite frankly sick, bored and tired of it.
Sorry, but who gives two ****s.
Quite frankly sick, bored and tired of it.
Sorry, but who gives two ****s.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Let's all be honest now. Unless you have family there, who really gives a ****e about the middle east - I mean "really".
Quite frankly sick, bored and tired of it.
Sorry, but who gives two ****s.
Quite frankly sick, bored and tired of it.
Sorry, but who gives two ****s.
#11
Originally Posted by OllyK
I guess anybody that uses oil or its products gives a $hit
Not just on this issue, generically. Every time I switch on the news all I ever see is this. Sick to the back teeth of it.
So you care about oil (no doubt the price of...) as do I but it's happened, and other things happen "out there" that we have no control over.
Maybe (just maybe) we should discuss something else other than a a bunch of biblical people that offer nothing to the world other than instability and crazy **** attitudes.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by _RIP_
Where do you get this sort of insight from Holy Ghost? You seem very well educated on the topic of world politics
#15
Originally Posted by Leslie
That is an incredibly short sighted view Big Man.
Les
Les
It's almost as though the media, especially the TV feel they MUST report on middle eastern movements, makers and shakers these days.
I am sure that there are more pressing matters happening in Britain, and indeed the world that have a greater importance than any sort of political movement in the middle east - no matter how remote.
Yes, I am sure it is important - however let's re-introduce some priorities before we all fall through the media-hyped loop.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
...and going on, and on, and on about it will change what?? Just numb and tired by all the middle east this, middle east that.
Not just on this issue, generically. Every time I switch on the news all I ever see is this. Sick to the back teeth of it.
So you care about oil (no doubt the price of...) as do I but it's happened, and other things happen "out there" that we have no control over.
Maybe (just maybe) we should discuss something else other than a a bunch of biblical people that offer nothing to the world other than instability and crazy **** attitudes.
Not just on this issue, generically. Every time I switch on the news all I ever see is this. Sick to the back teeth of it.
So you care about oil (no doubt the price of...) as do I but it's happened, and other things happen "out there" that we have no control over.
Maybe (just maybe) we should discuss something else other than a a bunch of biblical people that offer nothing to the world other than instability and crazy **** attitudes.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Ever since 9/11, all a middle eastern politicians has to do is fart and it's broadcasted as headline news.
It's almost as though the media, especially the TV feel they MUST report on middle eastern movements, makers and shakers these days.
I am sure that there are more pressing matters happening in Britain, and indeed the world that have a greater importance than any sort of political movement in the middle east - no matter how remote.
Yes, I am sure it is important - however let's re-introduce some priorities before we all fall through the media hyped loop.
It's almost as though the media, especially the TV feel they MUST report on middle eastern movements, makers and shakers these days.
I am sure that there are more pressing matters happening in Britain, and indeed the world that have a greater importance than any sort of political movement in the middle east - no matter how remote.
Yes, I am sure it is important - however let's re-introduce some priorities before we all fall through the media hyped loop.
Anyway, Israel managed to deal with the PLO (another terrorist organisation) and at one point the Israelis themselves were terrorists but then again the hypocrisy of Israel never ceses to amaze me, so I probably don't share Holy Ghost's optimism for the region.
#19
WW3.........I think that is a bit of a broad statement, Olly...??
A war in the Middle East - maybe, however the only countries I can see becoming involved from the developed world would be Britain and the US - as per normal.
However, I may be wrong. Though, I hope not!!!
A war in the Middle East - maybe, however the only countries I can see becoming involved from the developed world would be Britain and the US - as per normal.
However, I may be wrong. Though, I hope not!!!
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
WW3.........I think that is a bit of a broad statement, Olly...??
A war in the Middle East - maybe, however the only countries I can see becoming involved from the developed world would be Britain and the US - as per normal.
However, I may be wrong. Though, I hope not!!!
A war in the Middle East - maybe, however the only countries I can see becoming involved from the developed world would be Britain and the US - as per normal.
However, I may be wrong. Though, I hope not!!!
#21
Originally Posted by _RIP_
Where do you get this sort of insight from Holy Ghost? You seem very well educated on the topic of world politics
kind of you to say. i'm blushing. just read and observe is all. avoid tabloids and the Biased Broadcasting Corporation and you can't go wrong.
#23
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
It's called reading and observing the media and then forming your own opinions.
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
HG I sure hope your optimism is well placed and turns out to be correct.
My fear is that Hamas go the way of the Iranians and stand upto the US and Israel. Destabilising the middle east anymore than it is is the worst thing that can happen in terms of World politics and is the biggest threat to the use of nuclear weapons as Israel is trigger happy and has all the latest technology and can't wait to use it on Palestine/Iran/Syria and any other arab nation who dares stand up to them. Israel has just as many religious nutters as Palestine does and both sides want to see the other cease to exist.
The US wont stop them. Israel is led by a bunch of extremists (Sharon is (or was) nothing less than a war criminal with his military background and killing of Palestinians while in the Israeli army), Palestine is led by a bunch of extremists who bomb innocent civilians and want nothing more than to see Israel obliterated off the map and to me that doesn't give rise to optimism. A lot also depends on who takes Sharons place but I can't see it being someone who will be willing to deal with Hamas.
As for who gives a ****? I certainly do as I don't want there to be a WW3 which is what could happen if Israel kick off and all the World super powers take different sides.
I think this is the worst thing to happen to the middle east politically for a very long time.
One thing that is certainly very convenient is that the US have a large presence in the area now. They can base troops and aircraft in Saudi, Kuwait, Iraq, Pakistan, Turkey and Afghanistan which gives them a very nice angle from all sides of the middle east.
My fear is that Hamas go the way of the Iranians and stand upto the US and Israel. Destabilising the middle east anymore than it is is the worst thing that can happen in terms of World politics and is the biggest threat to the use of nuclear weapons as Israel is trigger happy and has all the latest technology and can't wait to use it on Palestine/Iran/Syria and any other arab nation who dares stand up to them. Israel has just as many religious nutters as Palestine does and both sides want to see the other cease to exist.
The US wont stop them. Israel is led by a bunch of extremists (Sharon is (or was) nothing less than a war criminal with his military background and killing of Palestinians while in the Israeli army), Palestine is led by a bunch of extremists who bomb innocent civilians and want nothing more than to see Israel obliterated off the map and to me that doesn't give rise to optimism. A lot also depends on who takes Sharons place but I can't see it being someone who will be willing to deal with Hamas.
As for who gives a ****? I certainly do as I don't want there to be a WW3 which is what could happen if Israel kick off and all the World super powers take different sides.
I think this is the worst thing to happen to the middle east politically for a very long time.
One thing that is certainly very convenient is that the US have a large presence in the area now. They can base troops and aircraft in Saudi, Kuwait, Iraq, Pakistan, Turkey and Afghanistan which gives them a very nice angle from all sides of the middle east.
Last edited by Bravo2zero_sps; 26 January 2006 at 09:40 PM.
#25
The middle east is of massive importance, which is why the U.S miliatry have just completed the construction of a huge base in Israel. WW3 starting from a larger middle east war is a great possibility. Israel is surrounded by enemies on all sides at present, and mahmoud ahmadinejad may just tip it over the edge.
With the U.S military already overstretched, a conflict with Iran (as is looking increasingly likely) would be the ideal oppurtunity for China to wade in on Taiwan, and for the North Korean loon to go after the south, & possibly Japan.
Should be an interesting year!
With the U.S military already overstretched, a conflict with Iran (as is looking increasingly likely) would be the ideal oppurtunity for China to wade in on Taiwan, and for the North Korean loon to go after the south, & possibly Japan.
Should be an interesting year!
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a very worrying development, Hamas are hardly going to start peace talks with Israel now theyre in power are they?
Israel obviously wont co-operate with terrorists, so will probably take direct action, like an air-strike on buildings where Hamas 'government' officials are in talks, and things will surely only escalate.
Iran may be closer to getting its hands on nuclear weapons than some people think, and they wont be as afraid to use them as the Western countries because it will all be in the 'name of allah' etc
US/UK surely need to do whatever it takes to stop Iran getting nukes.
Israel obviously wont co-operate with terrorists, so will probably take direct action, like an air-strike on buildings where Hamas 'government' officials are in talks, and things will surely only escalate.
Iran may be closer to getting its hands on nuclear weapons than some people think, and they wont be as afraid to use them as the Western countries because it will all be in the 'name of allah' etc
US/UK surely need to do whatever it takes to stop Iran getting nukes.
#27
What if more attacks are carried out on Israel in the form of suicide bombings, publically backed by a Hamas government? You then have a foreign government approving aggression against a neighbouring country, that could be construed as an act of war by Israel!
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
To have WW3 there needs surely to be a conflict of intrests/gain between the superpowers - what has Iran got to offer..?? The sqabble between the isreal/arabia is never going to go away but is never likley to be more than that as i see it .
Last edited by dpb; 26 January 2006 at 10:08 PM.