Hamid stripped of MBE
01 January 2007, 02:11 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hamid stripped of MBE
BBC NEWS | England | South Yorkshire | Ex-champ Hamed stripped of honour
Nice to see the scum has had his MBE taken off him. Ok Im sure he couldnt care less, but I wouldnt want him to be associated with people who have actually done some good.
Scumbag only served 15weeks of a 16month jail sentance for almost killing someone in a car accident he caused
I can only hope his victim is sueing the hell out of Hamed.
Nice to see the scum has had his MBE taken off him. Ok Im sure he couldnt care less, but I wouldnt want him to be associated with people who have actually done some good.
Scumbag only served 15weeks of a 16month jail sentance for almost killing someone in a car accident he caused
I can only hope his victim is sueing the hell out of Hamed.
Last edited by Puff The Magic Wagon!; 01 January 2007 at 07:23 PM.
01 January 2007, 02:27 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Just a thought and a genuine question. In light of the above why has Geoffrey Archer never been stripped of his knighthood?
01 January 2007, 03:03 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Just a thought and a genuine question. In light of the above why has Geoffrey Archer never been stripped of his knighthood?
01 January 2007, 03:48 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly. Its cos Nas is a Paki boxer not a white upper class toff.
Same old argument,upper class people wreck a restaurant and its "high Jinks". Football fans do it and they are mindless vandals probably brought up on a council estate by single parents.
Same old argument,upper class people wreck a restaurant and its "high Jinks". Football fans do it and they are mindless vandals probably brought up on a council estate by single parents.
Trending Topics
01 January 2007, 04:42 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Just a thought and a genuine question. In light of the above why has Geoffrey Archer never been stripped of his knighthood?
Well he hardly crippled someone for life did he.
Chip
01 January 2007, 04:45 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
Exactly. Its cos Nas is a Paki boxer not a white upper class toff.
Same old argument,upper class people wreck a restaurant and its "high Jinks". Football fans do it and they are mindless vandals probably brought up on a council estate by single parents.
Same old argument,upper class people wreck a restaurant and its "high Jinks". Football fans do it and they are mindless vandals probably brought up on a council estate by single parents.
prince charles is a white upper class toff. jeffrey archer is white lower-middle class chancer and well-connected convicted criminal. if you're going to stereotype, then please be accurate.
01 January 2007, 05:29 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF are you on. I was merely showing that the circumstances involved were totally different in each case.
Who mentioned knighting him.I certainly didn't.
Chip
Who mentioned knighting him.I certainly didn't.
Chip
01 January 2007, 05:35 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF am I on? 
Yes they are totally different.
One was an idiot who made a stupid split second error of judgement and then tried to cover his tracks whereas the other was a conniving, scheming, greedy, fame seeking politician who through his contacts evaded prosecution on several counts for many years before finally getting his comeuppance.
Why therefore should one have their honour removed and the other not? I suspect you already know the answer and probably support it.
Yes they are totally different. One was an idiot who made a stupid split second error of judgement and then tried to cover his tracks whereas the other was a conniving, scheming, greedy, fame seeking politician who through his contacts evaded prosecution on several counts for many years before finally getting his comeuppance.
Why therefore should one have their honour removed and the other not? I suspect you already know the answer and probably support it.
01 January 2007, 05:42 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One was an idiot who made a stupid split second error of judgement
Hamid had been banned before for driving at over 110mph.
Chip
01 January 2007, 05:51 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chip
Oh so thats OK then is it.
Hamid had been banned before for driving at over 110mph.
Chip
Hamid had been banned before for driving at over 110mph.
Chip
Of course one being a white connected politician whereas the other being a black ex-boxer has nothing to do with it as we are lucky to live in a classless society
01 January 2007, 05:57 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as i know Jeffrey Archer is a Lord. He's never had any other award. They did consider repealing it but it would have meant an act of parliament. Hameds can just be withdrawn by the crown.
01 January 2007, 06:01 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
As far as i know Jeffrey Archer is a Lord. He's never had any other award. They did consider repealing it but it would have meant an act of parliament. Hameds can just be withdrawn by the crown.
01 January 2007, 06:02 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Since when has this government let an Act of Parliament get in its way and you would think the chance to humble a one time leading Tory politician would be almost overwhelming
01 January 2007, 06:25 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
New Labour giveth, and New Labour taketh away again.
Their political correctness has them spinning like a top.
Their political correctness has them spinning like a top.
Maybe we should give them a nudge
03 January 2007, 03:55 AM
#21
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by f1_fan
WTF am I on? Yes they are totally different.
One was an idiot who made a stupid split second error of judgement and then tried to cover his tracks whereas the other was a conniving, scheming, greedy, fame seeking politician who through his contacts evaded prosecution on several counts for many years before finally getting his comeuppance.
Why therefore should one have their honour removed and the other not? I suspect you already know the answer and probably support it.
Yes they are totally different. One was an idiot who made a stupid split second error of judgement and then tried to cover his tracks whereas the other was a conniving, scheming, greedy, fame seeking politician who through his contacts evaded prosecution on several counts for many years before finally getting his comeuppance.
Why therefore should one have their honour removed and the other not? I suspect you already know the answer and probably support it.
Hamed is a nasty, vicious little **** who, with his 'posse', swaggered around Sheffield like he owned the place, was generally acknowledged to be an accident looking for somewhere to happen, and still drives like a tw@t, even after nearly killing somebody with his arrogant, reckless stupidity
Your summation of Archer, I would say is pretty much on the mark
Except you omitted the habitual lying about his past, and the criminally awful novels
03 January 2007, 06:00 AM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
If you are going to highlight their differences, you should at least try to be accurate
Hamed is a nasty, vicious little **** who, with his 'posse', swaggered around Sheffield like he owned the place, was generally acknowledged to be a ****
Hamed is a nasty, vicious little **** who, with his 'posse', swaggered around Sheffield like he owned the place, was generally acknowledged to be a ****
03 January 2007, 07:12 AM
#23
Scooby Regular
I don't know him. But I do know of him, from working in and around Sheffield with people who have to put up with the behaviour of him and his racist scum entourage
I doubt they enjoy the same immunity from 'police harrassment' as they used to though, not since his 'error of judgement'
I doubt they enjoy the same immunity from 'police harrassment' as they used to though, not since his 'error of judgement'
03 January 2007, 07:22 AM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
I don't know him. But I do know of him, from working in and around Sheffield with people who have to put up with the behaviour of him and his racist scum entourage
I doubt they enjoy the same immunity from 'police harrassment' as they used to though, not since his 'error of judgement'
I doubt they enjoy the same immunity from 'police harrassment' as they used to though, not since his 'error of judgement'
03 January 2007, 08:14 AM
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infractions - Scoobynet's version of the "scamera" van
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Just a thought and a genuine question. In light of the above why has Geoffrey Archer never been stripped of his knighthood?
03 January 2007, 08:29 AM
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
How many Lords have broken the law.........i'd imagine quite a few. Lord Brocket for one.
Back on topic, Hamed is a scummy ****
03 January 2007, 08:58 AM
#29
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by paulr
How many Lords have broken the law.........i'd imagine quite a few. Lord Brocket for one.
From what I remember, he dismantled, and buried in his grounds, several old Ferraris, including a 250GT SWB
with the intention of claiming to the insurance companies that they had been stolen.IIRC, he had a change of heart and didn't go through with it, the whole thing only coming to light because his wife made a statement to the police during their very bitter divorce proceedings
03 January 2007, 08:59 AM
#30
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordon_Brown
When I'm in power, I propose to; bring back the death penalty. People like Mr Hamed will complete their FULL sentence. I believe if you take a life, you pay with your life.
Gordon,
CoE
Gordon,
CoE