I blame Labour .........again
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are lots of reasons. I not sure it's fair to blame a particualr government - Especially when advances since 2000 are unlikely to be refelcted in the latest figures.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
I firmly beleive a worldwide approach to cancer needs to be taken. It is the biggest killer in the world by far (although not in the UK) and a pooling of resources and effort should be made.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
I firmly beleive a worldwide approach to cancer needs to be taken. It is the biggest killer in the world by far (although not in the UK) and a pooling of resources and effort should be made.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are lots of reasons. I not sure it's fair to blame a particualr government - Especially when advances since 2000 are unlikely to be refelcted in the latest figures.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
I firmly beleive a worldwide approach to cancer needs to be taken. It is the biggest killer in the world by far (although not in the UK) and a pooling of resources and effort should be made.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
I firmly beleive a worldwide approach to cancer needs to be taken. It is the biggest killer in the world by far (although not in the UK) and a pooling of resources and effort should be made.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
I think those figures are quite old now and hopefully things are a lot better now.
Les
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are lots of reasons. I not sure it's fair to blame a particualr government - Especially when advances since 2000 are unlikely to be refelcted in the latest figures.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
People need to see thier GP sooner - More facilities for screening need to be available, and of course more funds need to be allocated.
I firmly beleive a worldwide approach to cancer needs to be taken. It is the biggest killer in the world by far (although not in the UK) and a pooling of resources and effort should be made.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
We sholdn;t need charities to raise money for cancer reasearch - It shoul dbe one of the worlds biggest priorities.
And the top 3 worldwide seem to be TB, Malaria and AIDS
TB Alert: TB worldwide
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It doesen't even register in the top 10 for the developing world - http://www.alertnet.org/topkillerdiseases.htm
And the top 3 worldwide seem to be TB, Malaria and AIDS
TB Alert: TB worldwide
We have cures for all of those, AIDS aside, and that is virtually beaten now, whith drug complexes, you need never go on to develop fill blown AIDS from HIV, and people can look forward to an almost normal life expectancy.
Diseases that kill in the developing world is purely a money issue, not a reaseach one. We have the cures
If those money issues were sorted out, then surely cancer would become the worlds biggest killer, on account of effectively having no cure
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm... Surprising.. However...
We have cures for all of those, AIDS aside, and that is virtually beaten now, whith drug complexes, you need never go on to develop fill blown AIDS from HIV, and people can look forward to an almost normal life expectancy.
Diseases that kill in the developing world is purely a money issue, not a reaseach one. We have the cures
If those money issues were sorted out, then surely cancer would become the worlds biggest killer, on account of effectively having no cure
We have cures for all of those, AIDS aside, and that is virtually beaten now, whith drug complexes, you need never go on to develop fill blown AIDS from HIV, and people can look forward to an almost normal life expectancy.
Diseases that kill in the developing world is purely a money issue, not a reaseach one. We have the cures
If those money issues were sorted out, then surely cancer would become the worlds biggest killer, on account of effectively having no cure
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ohabsolutely. I think our lifestyle has a massive impact on Cancer rates, and it is an absolute certainty for Heart Disease (the UK's biggest killer).
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my home town, the sheer amount of people my folks age dying of cancer is quite high
A lot of people put it down to the old sellophone factory from 20-30 years ago
It was known back then for clothes to rot on the washing lines after only being out in the garden for several hours, especially those living in the same street as the factory
It has long since been pulled down and flattened, but they can never do anything with the land due to the toxic chemicals that are still stored there underground
A lot of people put it down to the old sellophone factory from 20-30 years ago
It was known back then for clothes to rot on the washing lines after only being out in the garden for several hours, especially those living in the same street as the factory
It has long since been pulled down and flattened, but they can never do anything with the land due to the toxic chemicals that are still stored there underground
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Scooby Regular
No, I will do as I'm told ............... if it is now SN Policy for no Political Threads then I will abide by it - I have always sat happily with the Terms and Conditions.
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thankfully most of my treatment has been private, so no long waits, not even for radiotherapy (NHS).
But in my case in the first place it was identified fairly early during a work medical. However at the time the best treatment was not available on the NHS and without private care I wouldnt be here today.
I do agree if its picked up early then your chances improve considerably. Its this early identification thats the key and I dont feel we do a good job of that in the UK.
Last edited by r32; 23 August 2007 at 07:10 AM.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Diagnosis has always been difficult IMO or at the very least left far too late because of the way things are within the Health Service
I do think they do a great job when they do, but getting the timescales and diagnosis are the biggest battles
I didnt go private, was seen pretty quicklly and my consultant was fantastic all the way through, in fact pretty much everybody was fanstastic, I got early diagnosis and after two years it came back and again was picked up on early diagnosis due to me still being on remission from the 1st bout
It annoys me with the elderly, that all too often diagnosis isn't usually made until it is too far spread, too late to even attempt to cure, because in the main GP's just assume that the elderly are old and hence just old age settling in, and not something more sinister
I have seen it happen so many times too
I do think they do a great job when they do, but getting the timescales and diagnosis are the biggest battles
I didnt go private, was seen pretty quicklly and my consultant was fantastic all the way through, in fact pretty much everybody was fanstastic, I got early diagnosis and after two years it came back and again was picked up on early diagnosis due to me still being on remission from the 1st bout
It annoys me with the elderly, that all too often diagnosis isn't usually made until it is too far spread, too late to even attempt to cure, because in the main GP's just assume that the elderly are old and hence just old age settling in, and not something more sinister
I have seen it happen so many times too
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post