Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Madrid plane crash !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 August 2008, 05:51 PM
  #1  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Madrid plane crash !

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Many dead in Madrid plane crash

Over 100 people killed after plane crashed on take-off
Old 20 August 2008, 06:04 PM
  #2  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It has been very confusing, quite shocking at times when BBC said that 7 were apparently dead, then they denied any fatalities but informed about 20 injured (based upon Reuters info at that time). Sky were ever talking different numbers of the injured and fatalities. Eventually, it seems like it is about 100 killed in this crash, Apparently a major crash at Madrid airport since 1983.

Horrendous.

There is a lot of speculation about how it happened. Soon things will become clearer.

Last edited by Turbohot; 20 August 2008 at 07:10 PM.
Old 20 August 2008, 06:13 PM
  #3  
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Shark Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Likely to be an aborted take-off. Reports are that an engine was on fireduring take off.

Why is the question, did it actually get airbourn or not?

How well do these DC9/MD80s fly on one engine. I know most twin-jets are ok, but I'm not sure with these old T-tails.
Old 20 August 2008, 06:22 PM
  #4  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shark Man
Likely to be an aborted take-off. Reports are that an engine was on fireduring take off.

Why is the question, did it actually get airbourn or not?

How well do these DC9/MD80s fly on one engine. I know most twin-jets are ok, but I'm not sure with these old T-tails.
Apparently,the pilot aborted the first take-off attempt and returned to the stand where some kind of work was carried out on the plane.

It then attempted another take-off and crashed

BBC news are saying it could now be around 140 dead !
Old 20 August 2008, 06:52 PM
  #5  
Flatcapdriver
Scooby Regular
 
Flatcapdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here we go. Ill informed armchair experts quoting dubious media reports queue up here and spout forth.


Old 20 August 2008, 06:54 PM
  #6  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Here we go. Ill informed armchair experts quoting dubious media reports queue up here and spout forth.


Who's doing that mate

I was just making people aware of what had happened that's all - If you have nothing valuable to add then don't bother !
Old 20 August 2008, 06:59 PM
  #7  
Flatcapdriver
Scooby Regular
 
Flatcapdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 340BHP-WRX
Who's doing that mate

I was just making people aware of what had happened that's all - If you have nothing valuable to add then don't bother !
And what makes you think my comments were aimed at you? Unless, you're going to join the others who have/claim a tenuous link with commercial aviation and then spout crap about a subject they know little about in an attempt to make themselves knowledgeable?
Old 20 August 2008, 07:01 PM
  #8  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
And what makes you think my comments were aimed at you? Unless, you're going to join the others who have/claim a tenuous link with commercial aviation and then spout crap about a subject they know little about in an attempt to make themselves knowledgeable?
Fair enough - just the way I read it I thought you were having a pop at me.

Official death toll is now 147
Old 20 August 2008, 07:03 PM
  #9  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If it was going to happen anyway, somewhere, why couldn't Mr Glitter be on it.
Old 20 August 2008, 07:39 PM
  #10  
Sheepsplitter
Scooby Regular
 
Sheepsplitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by J4CKO
If it was going to happen anyway, somewhere, why couldn't Mr Glitter be on it.


You see, this is absolute evidence that god does not exist!
Old 20 August 2008, 07:41 PM
  #11  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Glitter, spread over a wide area, see how nice it sounds....

Terrible crash though, we get complacent these days are its comparatively rare but it all comes back when this happens.
Old 20 August 2008, 07:56 PM
  #12  
Iwan
Scooby Regular
 
Iwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J4CKO
If it was going to happen anyway, somewhere, why couldn't Mr Glitter be on it.
+1, RIP to all who lost their lives.
Old 21 August 2008, 08:57 AM
  #13  
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Shark Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Here we go. Ill informed armchair experts quoting dubious media reports queue up here and spout forth.



Que?

I just repeated that it appears to be an aborted take off and asked how well do MD twinjets fly/ascend on one engine.

More of a question than an "armchair opinion"

Last time I checked, this wasn't PPRuNe (hardly inhabited by "experts" either). Don't like it? move along to another thread. Or enable remote desktop and I'll do it for you



Last edited by Shark Man; 21 August 2008 at 09:03 AM. Reason: Added extra "whatever" and "rolleyes" for good measure :lol1:
Old 21 August 2008, 09:07 AM
  #14  
Turbo2
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got a completely uninformed leather office chair opinion if that helps? I don't think any fully laden twin engine airliner would successfully take-off if one of the engines failed at the point of take-off. In-flight is a different matter, but at take-off both engines are given the full beans by the pilot, so if you suddenly take 50% of that power away and add in any unbalancing caused, I fear you'll end up with a Madrid scenario every time. I'd be interested to know if the same would apply to a 3 or 4 engined airliner.
Old 21 August 2008, 09:27 AM
  #15  
Dieseldog
Scooby Regular
 
Dieseldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2
I don't think any fully laden twin engine airliner would successfully take-off if one of the engines failed at the point of take-off. In-flight is a different matter, but at take-off both engines are given the full beans by the pilot, so if you suddenly take 50% of that power away and add in any unbalancing caused, I fear you'll end up with a Madrid scenario every time.
You should be able to, Turbo2. The pilots perform a calculation of the power required, taking into account all the variables - runway length, air temperature, air pressure, wind direction/speed, aircraft weight, etc and the resultant power setting required for takeoff should be sufficient to carry the aircraft into the air following the loss of one engine after the V1 speed has been reached (before V1 they will reject the takeoff). The 'swing' of the aircraft following an engine failure should be less on an aircraft with the engines strapped to the fuselage, rather than out on the wing, too.

I haven't a clue what happened in this case and would just wait until the investigators report (just in case our resident pilot, FCD, jumps in to bollock me) - I'm just answering your query TH.
Old 21 August 2008, 09:56 AM
  #16  
Turbo2
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for that. I'm off to Norway next week using twin engined jets, so I can fly with a little more assurance now!
Old 21 August 2008, 12:47 PM
  #17  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dieseldog
You should be able to, Turbo2. The pilots perform a calculation of the power required, taking into account all the variables - runway length, air temperature, air pressure, wind direction/speed, aircraft weight, etc and the resultant power setting required for takeoff should be sufficient to carry the aircraft into the air following the loss of one engine after the V1 speed has been reached (before V1 they will reject the takeoff). The 'swing' of the aircraft following an engine failure should be less on an aircraft with the engines strapped to the fuselage, rather than out on the wing, too.

I haven't a clue what happened in this case and would just wait until the investigators report (just in case our resident pilot, FCD, jumps in to bollock me) - I'm just answering your query TH.
Thats seems a pretty accurate representation according to what we know so far and what goes on during the planning and subsequently the take off stage. There are regulations of course for civil passenger aircraft with respect to take off and the initial climb out.

I doubt that even FCD will be able to jump about over that!

Les
Old 16 September 2008, 01:42 PM
  #18  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Worrying !!

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | 'Wing flaps failed' on Spain jet
Old 16 September 2008, 01:44 PM
  #19  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didnt even hear anything about all this what bad news
Old 16 September 2008, 03:20 PM
  #20  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Funkii Munkii
It is a worrying situation. If the pilots had selected take-off flap and it had not travelled as it should have, or moved away from the selection later, that is a very good reason for the crash. The flaps, usually leading and trailing edge flaps when selected to take off position will reduce the stalling speed of the aircraft without increasing the extra drag unduly. It is standard practice to do this and in fact it is never done practically to take off with the flaps selected up.

If they took off without take off flap, they could get the aircraft airborne initially but once it had left the ground effect then it was in great danger of stalling and crashing. The crash at Staines some years ago was stated to be due to the leading edge flaps being selected in too early in error. the aircraft's behaviour as described by a survivor after take off from Madrid would tie in with such a situation.

It is difficult to imagine that two pilots would forget to select those flaps during the pre take off checks. It is such an important and necessary check. the worry as stated above is if there was a system failure which allowed them to travel back in during or before takeoff.

Les
Old 16 September 2008, 03:55 PM
  #21  
Scoob99
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Scoob99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Jaguar 3.0 sport now bought, Am loving it!!!!!
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The crash at Staines some years ago was stated to be due to the leading edge flaps being selected in too early in error.


God I remember that one, we had not long moved to the area, and all I can remember is sirens and blues lights all night long as our new house backed onto the A4(Great West Road)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM
Reshard1977
Subaru Parts
9
22 September 2015 11:48 PM
vertexboy
General Technical
3
09 September 2015 06:20 PM
johnfelstead
ScoobyNet General
27
26 February 2001 05:48 PM
john banks
ScoobyNet General
5
08 July 2000 04:33 PM



Quick Reply: Madrid plane crash !



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 PM.