How are you lot minimising the 50% Tax hit?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
![Question](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Salary Sacrifice is my favoured device ... may even need to go offshore ... what tricks are you employing?
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Whatever Anim](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/Whatever_anim.gif)
Lets look at the numbers
Someone earning £175k a year basic (without any existing tax saving methods) will be £5k a year worse off.
You'll be fine Pete - even if we "accept" that you are earning over £150k a year - yes, I know, its stretching the imagination a bit, to consider going "offshore" (do you even know that that entails, by the way?) for that amount of additional tax is laughable.
Last edited by Devildog; 25 March 2010 at 11:56 AM. Reason: sorted the calculaton
#11
#12
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Where did you get £1800 worse off from it's more than that
2010/11
Earnings Summary Yearly Monthly Weekly
Gross Pay £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Free Allowances £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Total Taxable £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Due £65,020.00 £5,418.33 £1,250.38
National Insurance £5,509.60 £459.13 £105.95
Total Deductions £70,529.60 £5,877.47 £1,356.34
Net Earnings £104,470.40 £8,705.87 £2,009.05
Employers National Ins £21,667.84 £1,805.65 £416.69
2009/10
Earnings Summary Yearly Monthly Weekly
Gross Pay £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Free Allowances £6,475.00 £539.58 £124.52
Total Taxable £168,525.00 £14,043.75 £3,240.87
Tax Due £59,930.00 £4,994.17 £1,152.50
National Insurance £5,509.60 £459.13 £105.95
Total Deductions £65,439.60 £5,453.30 £1,258.45
Net Earnings £109,560.40 £9,130.03 £2,106.93
Employers National Ins £21,667.84 £1,805.65 £416.69
(sorry about the formatting)
2010/11
Earnings Summary Yearly Monthly Weekly
Gross Pay £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Free Allowances £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Total Taxable £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Due £65,020.00 £5,418.33 £1,250.38
National Insurance £5,509.60 £459.13 £105.95
Total Deductions £70,529.60 £5,877.47 £1,356.34
Net Earnings £104,470.40 £8,705.87 £2,009.05
Employers National Ins £21,667.84 £1,805.65 £416.69
2009/10
Earnings Summary Yearly Monthly Weekly
Gross Pay £175,000.00 £14,583.33 £3,365.38
Tax Free Allowances £6,475.00 £539.58 £124.52
Total Taxable £168,525.00 £14,043.75 £3,240.87
Tax Due £59,930.00 £4,994.17 £1,152.50
National Insurance £5,509.60 £459.13 £105.95
Total Deductions £65,439.60 £5,453.30 £1,258.45
Net Earnings £109,560.40 £9,130.03 £2,106.93
Employers National Ins £21,667.84 £1,805.65 £416.69
(sorry about the formatting)
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe I'm being simple Devildog, but an extra 10% tax on the £25k over £150k is £2.5k. Additionally they would lose all their personal allowance so are going to pay about another £3k on top of that. £5.5k in all, but still not worth moving for.
What might affect more people is the loss of personal allowance just over £100k of taxable income. This is apparently a marginal 62% rate of tax. That is a disincentive to work for many who might aspire to increase their income.
What might affect more people is the loss of personal allowance just over £100k of taxable income. This is apparently a marginal 62% rate of tax. That is a disincentive to work for many who might aspire to increase their income.
#15
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you earnt £250k which is a lot of money, and am sure the person is very comfortable, net to them (after they've had their pants pulled down) - they're going to be about £12k worse off, you can see why the bigger earners are jumping ship... thing that makes me laugh is the people at this end of the scale and more, must be paying a lot in stamp duty, VAT for purchases (higher end cars, more fuel tax), they would no doubt be paying for private health/schooling/dentists etc etc and so are hardly a drain on the system, and even on any savings they'll be paying this silly rate too... so it's not just on salary.
Kind of doesn't make sense to **** these people off too much for the sake of an extra 5k on 175k that person was already paying 60k in income tax alone and 21.6k on national insurance ! As soon as that person moves to dubai where they pay 0%, all of this is gone ! Cutting your nose of to spite your face methinks...
(for tax calc's I was looking at Free UK Tax Calculator. Updated for 2010/2011 Tax Year.)
Kind of doesn't make sense to **** these people off too much for the sake of an extra 5k on 175k that person was already paying 60k in income tax alone and 21.6k on national insurance ! As soon as that person moves to dubai where they pay 0%, all of this is gone ! Cutting your nose of to spite your face methinks...
(for tax calc's I was looking at Free UK Tax Calculator. Updated for 2010/2011 Tax Year.)
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Set up a small LLP company.
Paying the directors dividends (and withhold tax for repayment)
Paying profits into pension
Paying the directors dividends (and withhold tax for repayment)
Paying profits into pension
Last edited by BlkKnight; 25 March 2010 at 11:26 AM.
#17
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Trouble with that is a lot of people will be paid via PAYE, not sure how many companies are going to entertain that sort of arrangement. Might be ok for your typical "contractor" (IT, or a tradesman) but for your average employee am thinking they're not going to entertain that. Especially as it will reek of tax avoidance...
Any other ideas though ?
Any other ideas though ?
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Both the company and the staff have to be willing - there are potential gains for both in terms of cost savings.
The company sets up a holding company which the staff are all partners in - they get paid via the holding company & the company withholds their TAX & NI contributions and pays their bill for them at the end of the year. Simples.
Only potential drawback is that the staff are not counted as "Employees" in terms of employment protection so the company could potentially do the nasty on them - This however is down to the morals of the company.
The company sets up a holding company which the staff are all partners in - they get paid via the holding company & the company withholds their TAX & NI contributions and pays their bill for them at the end of the year. Simples.
Only potential drawback is that the staff are not counted as "Employees" in terms of employment protection so the company could potentially do the nasty on them - This however is down to the morals of the company.
Last edited by BlkKnight; 25 March 2010 at 11:45 AM.
#19
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ah I see... nice idea, I'd be willing to forego the employment protection for the "benefits" but am sure others wouldn't. As I mentioned above, working for a bank makes this arrangement somewhat unlikely unfortunately.
Best of luck to everyone that goes this route though... give nothing back
Best of luck to everyone that goes this route though... give nothing back
![Smile](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#20
Scooby Regular
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe I'm being simple Devildog, but an extra 10% tax on the £25k over £150k is £2.5k. Additionally they would lose all their personal allowance so are going to pay about another £3k on top of that. £5.5k in all, but still not worth moving for.
What might affect more people is the loss of personal allowance just over £100k of taxable income. This is apparently a marginal 62% rate of tax. That is a disincentive to work for many who might aspire to increase their income.
What might affect more people is the loss of personal allowance just over £100k of taxable income. This is apparently a marginal 62% rate of tax. That is a disincentive to work for many who might aspire to increase their income.
Agreed- my calculation was wrong as it included an individuals personal tax allowance -I hadn't taken account of the reduction in personal allowance
![Embarrassment](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/smilies/redface.gif)
Even so, as you point out, £5k pa is not worth the upheaval, unless you were moving anyway.
Not sure I agree with your disincentive point, though. The loss of personal allowance is tapered, so you may pay more tax over £100k, but will still increase your earnings by more than the tax cost for every additonal £1 earned, just by not as much as you would have done last year. The allowance reduces by £1 for every £2 of earnings over £100k
Hence my point about the benefit attached to salary sacrifice versus the additional tax.
At least we don't have a 90% tax band as we did under old labour (yet!)
Last edited by Devildog; 25 March 2010 at 11:57 AM.
#22
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
John,
Not sure I agree with your disincentive point, though. The loss of personal allowance is tapered, so you may pay more tax over £100k, but will still increase your earnings by more than the tax cost for every additonal £1 earned, just by not as much as you would have done last year. The allowance reduces by £1 for every £2 of earnings over £100k
Not sure I agree with your disincentive point, though. The loss of personal allowance is tapered, so you may pay more tax over £100k, but will still increase your earnings by more than the tax cost for every additonal £1 earned, just by not as much as you would have done last year. The allowance reduces by £1 for every £2 of earnings over £100k
Most people in this income range work long hours, have sacrificed a lot to achieve, they are the aspirational middle classes. For this group, this threshold is a glass ceiling that would mean they'd rather take another day off!
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#26
Scooby Regular
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For every pound of taxable income you earn between £100k and £112k, you keep 38p I gather. That is a disincentive if you are self employed and wondering about taking on more work when you are interested in work:life balance and for various reasons don't find this easy to avoid as they don't want to set up a limited company or put more in a pension.
Most people in this income range work long hours, have sacrificed a lot to achieve, they are the aspirational middle classes. For this group, this threshold is a glass ceiling that would mean they'd rather take another day off!
Most people in this income range work long hours, have sacrificed a lot to achieve, they are the aspirational middle classes. For this group, this threshold is a glass ceiling that would mean they'd rather take another day off!
If they *need* the extra cash they would work the hours, albeit with a higher tax penalty. And if they didn't, then they should probably be taking that day off anyway and enjoying life a bit more.
I would also question whether the jump to 50% tax and tapering PA is any different to someone about to breach the 40% tax band
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Having a marginal rate that goes 40 to 62 to 40 to 50 over a £50k range is madness. This is very different to going from basic rate to 40 and the sticking there. The bump to 62% is quite bad psychologically as you know that just in income tax the treasury is taking more of your income than you are.
People may not work because they *need* extra cash at this level unless they have huge commitments. They work because the reward for their work is worthwhile. The 62% tax in a range that you could decide to work your *** off to earn just makes you want to stay in bed.
There is I gather reasonable evidence that cutting taxes can increase the tax take. This is a perfect example.
People may not work because they *need* extra cash at this level unless they have huge commitments. They work because the reward for their work is worthwhile. The 62% tax in a range that you could decide to work your *** off to earn just makes you want to stay in bed.
There is I gather reasonable evidence that cutting taxes can increase the tax take. This is a perfect example.
#28
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.scoobynet.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's all well and good getting paid from the director's loan account (this is how I paid myself for a while) but your small LLP company has to be seen to turn a profit or someone will still end up with a massive PAYE bill !!
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts