Pakistan Floods
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pakistan Floods
I get quite depressed hearing about the terrible disaster hitting Pakistan. I imagine being a family man over there watching your house and animals destroyed with no real hope for the future and watching your kids die slowly from dysentery. And the scale of the disaster is incredible.
I have never worked in the disaster field or even been in a real monsoon but I wonder if anyone on here has?
There is one thing that I would like someone who knows to comment on. Many victims die because there is no fresh water available but yet tens of thousands of gallons of rainwater, which I presume is quite safe to drink, pour down every second. But I have never seen a mention of any simple device provided by an aid agency to enable some of this water to be harvested? For example if 3 cms per hour of rain falls on a sheet (tarpaulin say) measuring 3m x 3m that produces 60 gallons of water, say 30 gallons with losses. That keeps several families going for a few days.
The water catching devices can be very crude to start with and soon become more sophisticated and efficient. Cheap to make (recycled plastic, for example), lightweight and easy to transport by cart of helicopter.
I am sorry if this sounds silly but I can't get it out of my mind.
And btw I think it is appalling that the President is away from his people
dl
I have never worked in the disaster field or even been in a real monsoon but I wonder if anyone on here has?
There is one thing that I would like someone who knows to comment on. Many victims die because there is no fresh water available but yet tens of thousands of gallons of rainwater, which I presume is quite safe to drink, pour down every second. But I have never seen a mention of any simple device provided by an aid agency to enable some of this water to be harvested? For example if 3 cms per hour of rain falls on a sheet (tarpaulin say) measuring 3m x 3m that produces 60 gallons of water, say 30 gallons with losses. That keeps several families going for a few days.
The water catching devices can be very crude to start with and soon become more sophisticated and efficient. Cheap to make (recycled plastic, for example), lightweight and easy to transport by cart of helicopter.
I am sorry if this sounds silly but I can't get it out of my mind.
And btw I think it is appalling that the President is away from his people
dl
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Our government has already pledges £5,000,000.00.
Now not trying to sound nasty, but when we had floods (ok not on the same scale), it was all supported by our government and uk citizens, yes there should be collections, but these are mainly by pakistani run businesses, personally I would not donate via one of these busninesses but find an aid group (red cross etc) that will be sending aid out.
Tony
Now not trying to sound nasty, but when we had floods (ok not on the same scale), it was all supported by our government and uk citizens, yes there should be collections, but these are mainly by pakistani run businesses, personally I would not donate via one of these busninesses but find an aid group (red cross etc) that will be sending aid out.
Tony
#4
I fully understand the effect this has had on the country, however as far as donating outside of the UK, I'm all out, sorry, but we're in enough **** ourselves.
We need to start bailing our own country out of debt, not increasing it's debt by pledging millions to other countries. This is monies with no return for the UK.
We need to start bailing our own country out of debt, not increasing it's debt by pledging millions to other countries. This is monies with no return for the UK.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: At the diesel pump...
Posts: 8,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But I have never seen a mention of any simple device provided by an aid agency to enable some of this water to be harvested? For example if 3 cms per hour of rain falls on a sheet (tarpaulin say) measuring 3m x 3m that produces 60 gallons of water, say 30 gallons with losses. That keeps several families going for a few days.
The water catching devices can be very crude to start with and soon become more sophisticated and efficient. Cheap to make (recycled plastic, for example), lightweight and easy to transport by cart of helicopter.
The water catching devices can be very crude to start with and soon become more sophisticated and efficient. Cheap to make (recycled plastic, for example), lightweight and easy to transport by cart of helicopter.
Problem is 1, its all civi companies that make them, and the amount of them you'd need to make them effective.
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, there are devices that can do that job, the outdoor market is full of them. They wont filter the volume that your thinking of, but they would do the job of giving a family safe water, about 10l a day.
Problem is 1, its all civi companies that make them, and the amount of them you'd need to make them effective.
Problem is 1, its all civi companies that make them, and the amount of them you'd need to make them effective.
I was not suggesting a filter as such, just a very crude collecting mechanism catching rainwater.
Jap Import. Fair enough but we are only talking about a few pence per UK citizen. UK has its priorities all wrong. Imagine how much more we could give if we didn't spend billions on wars and white elephants like Tridents. IMHO of course.
DingDongler. Couldn't agree more. Clearly the moderators are happy that a racist remark is quite acceptable these days. It isn't even funny as that "joke" was old even when the tsunami struck. Very childish.
============
And it's getting worse by the day.
d
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And their leaders to get richer. Sometimes. I have seen it happen. But agencies are getting more focused and, in my view, the small projects work better. But even then things go wrong. Witness that awful killing of that eye team in Afghanistan a couple of days ago. Would you deny them the modest aid money that kept them going for 30 plus years and did so much good?
And you can't blame the Pakistani government for the monsoons and don't we have a moral responsibility to do something to save lives on this small planet of ours? NOT trying to preach - just my opinions
dl
#9
And their leaders to get richer. Sometimes. I have seen it happen. But agencies are getting more focused and, in my view, the small projects work better. But even then things go wrong. Witness that awful killing of that eye team in Afghanistan a couple of days ago. Would you deny them the modest aid money that kept them going for 30 plus years and did so much good?
And you can't blame the Pakistani government for the monsoons and don't we have a moral responsibility to do something to save lives on this small planet of ours? NOT trying to preach - just my opinions
dl
And you can't blame the Pakistani government for the monsoons and don't we have a moral responsibility to do something to save lives on this small planet of ours? NOT trying to preach - just my opinions
dl
For example earthquakes can't be stopped but regulations can make buildings stronger.
Droughts etc can be managed with proper agricultural policies.
Aid let's useless 3rd world elites and governments off the hook. The ultimate example is N. Korea.
#10
And their leaders to get richer. Sometimes. I have seen it happen. But agencies are getting more focused and, in my view, the small projects work better. But even then things go wrong. Witness that awful killing of that eye team in Afghanistan a couple of days ago. Would you deny them the modest aid money that kept them going for 30 plus years and did so much good?
And you can't blame the Pakistani government for the monsoons and don't we have a moral responsibility to do something to save lives on this small planet of ours? NOT trying to preach - just my opinions
dl
And you can't blame the Pakistani government for the monsoons and don't we have a moral responsibility to do something to save lives on this small planet of ours? NOT trying to preach - just my opinions
dl
Les
#11
I agree wwith what you say dl. As I said above, I hope the money is going to the right places. There have been bad stories about crooked leaders diverting the cash to their private accounts and also of them selling the donated food aid to the people who were starving!
Les
Les
#12
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got to hand it to the efficiency of the Pakistani Government, who managed to get millions out of the country and into Britain before the floods hit by starting the evacuation in 1956...
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the country/people need the support and not to confuse the government and i think it important to keep the two as separate as possible.
What i do find hard to resolve is Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme and military spending given that they cannot deal with flooding that happens each year, ok this is exceptional but not unique.
They should think a little more carefully about what and how they spend their money and put the people first, not get into a p*ssing contest with India!
Having said that it is just not fair the people and especially the children suffer just to make a point.
What i do find hard to resolve is Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme and military spending given that they cannot deal with flooding that happens each year, ok this is exceptional but not unique.
They should think a little more carefully about what and how they spend their money and put the people first, not get into a p*ssing contest with India!
Having said that it is just not fair the people and especially the children suffer just to make a point.
#14
Scooby Regular
I think the country/people need the support and not to confuse the government and i think it important to keep the two as separate as possible.
What i do find hard to resolve is Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme and military spending given that they cannot deal with flooding that happens each year, ok this is exceptional but not unique.
They should think a little more carefully about what and how they spend their money and put the people first, not get into a p*ssing contest with India!
Having said that it is just not fair the people and especially the children suffer just to make a point.
What i do find hard to resolve is Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme and military spending given that they cannot deal with flooding that happens each year, ok this is exceptional but not unique.
They should think a little more carefully about what and how they spend their money and put the people first, not get into a p*ssing contest with India!
Having said that it is just not fair the people and especially the children suffer just to make a point.
However your comment about prioritising applies to all countries. America, one of the so called richest countries in the world with its huge armed forces still has some of the most awful ghettos in the world and millions of the poorest with no real access to medical care. I'm sure we could find similar examples for the UK.
Don't forget the awful shambolic response to Hurricane Katrina from the most powerful country in the world
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paul, I have very little time for the Pakistani government (and others like it) ie unelected and on the whole quite corrupt.
However your comment about prioritising applies to all countries. America, one of the so called richest countries in the world with its huge armed forces still has some of the most awful ghettos in the world and millions of the poorest with no real access to medical care. I'm sure we could find similar examples for the UK.
Don't forget the awful shambolic response to Hurricane Katrina from the most powerful country in the world
However your comment about prioritising applies to all countries. America, one of the so called richest countries in the world with its huge armed forces still has some of the most awful ghettos in the world and millions of the poorest with no real access to medical care. I'm sure we could find similar examples for the UK.
Don't forget the awful shambolic response to Hurricane Katrina from the most powerful country in the world
I do see the death and destruction and what bothers me that the people vote the government in to put the best interests of the people first yet guns and bombs and being bigger and tougher than their neighbour(s) get priority. As i said the floods are not a one off, they happen pretty much each year, not always this severe but it does happen, so why cannot the government prepare, prioritise and prevent, failing prevention deal the the aftermath which is usually more expensive.
The issue is you just cannot punish the people but they really do need to think about who and why they elect, not just the party who sabre rattles the most or loudest.
This applies to the united states and other countries as much as Pakistan and yet the good will of people of other countries will bail out the government and save the people because no one can just sit by an do nothing.
It is all messed up.
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paul, this is not just an "ordinary" flood. It's the worst for a century if not longer. 14 million people affected. No government could prepare for this.
david
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do agree the worst floods for a long time but that does not prevent money being spent on prevention and control of floods and reducing the casualties, deaths and people affected.
Otherwise why bother at all with anything at all, it is going to get worse not matter what we do, not the right attitude, strategy or policy - IMHO!
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
quite right . i wouldnt send em the sweat of my **** to drink let alone money to fund training camps , like i said karma has a wonderfull way of biting you on the **** , as for their presadent over here with cameron . fair play he is probably property hunting while learing how to waste money like our goverment
#21
#23
#25
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Wrong"
It was the fact that that bloke from Pakistan "Biggi" wanted to sniff my white wifes knickers and dominate me that invoked the wrath of the Moderators....
People are drowning / getting their legs wet and all he wanted to do was pork mrs hunt and keep her knickers as some sort of throphy
I cry at the thought of how cruel the world has become
It was the fact that that bloke from Pakistan "Biggi" wanted to sniff my white wifes knickers and dominate me that invoked the wrath of the Moderators....
People are drowning / getting their legs wet and all he wanted to do was pork mrs hunt and keep her knickers as some sort of throphy
I cry at the thought of how cruel the world has become
#28
#29
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
Scooby Regular