Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

IS this 50" tv worth it for £418

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 November 2010, 09:33 AM
  #1  
vallumlj
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
vallumlj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IS this 50" tv worth it for £418

I am looking for a 50" tv and have just saw this at bestbuy.

After quidco and using the discount code this tv comes down to £418

Samsung - Samsung PS50C450 50" Plasma HD Ready TV - PS50C450B1WXXU - Best Buy UK

Is it worth for that price. It seems a still.

I know it is only 720p will only be using it for sky sd/hd
Old 21 November 2010, 09:41 AM
  #2  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It says it shows 1080p as well, maybe it upscales it. Looks pretty good for the price I have to say. I think Samsung is reliable enough although I have not had one of that make.

I would not get a tv which could not accept 1080p thinking ahead to full HD when it arrives.

Les
Old 21 November 2010, 10:46 AM
  #3  
Ant
Scooby Regular
 
Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Notts
Posts: 9,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it'll be a printing error , it will do 720p and 1080i which sky is anyways
Old 21 November 2010, 12:56 PM
  #4  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Bearing in mind most places are selling the 42" model of this thing for around the same price, it does seem like a pretty good deal. Performance-wise, I think the equivalent LGs usually rate slightly better on black levels, colour-accuracy, and lower image-retention, but it's still a very passable set for the money.
Old 21 November 2010, 01:09 PM
  #5  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,041
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

This is a 720 line TV, on a 50" is not worth it. Pixel size is too big in that screen size (especially if the room is too small).

Remember because it says it can do 1080, doesn't mean it has 1080lines. This is a 720 line screen that can downscale a 1080 signal into 720. "HD READY" is not "FULL HD". This is the trap many fall into when turned on by a lower price.

If it were sub 42" and cheaper, a 720 line screen would be fine.

Look at the LG 50PK350 its only £559 and is a genuine 1080 line Full HD TV. (note the letter "K": 50PK350 avoid the 50PJ350 as that is a 720 line TV ): http://www.dixons.co.uk/gbuk/lg-50pk...867&xtor=AL-78

Alternatively, look at the Panasonic TX-P46S20 or Samsung PS50C530

Last edited by ALi-B; 21 November 2010 at 01:23 PM.
Old 21 November 2010, 01:26 PM
  #6  
jods
Scooby Senior
 
jods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 6,645
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From Which: 42" Info - maybe indicator of expectation for 50"?

You can expect to find this entry-level TV - a 42-inch HD-ready plasma from Samsung - at a competitive price. It's easy to use and fairly energy efficient for a plasma TV, but if you're after the best picture and sound quality for your money, then look elsewhere.

The picture is no better than average, and certainly not comparable with the best LCD and LED sets we've seen from Samsung. The screen is very reflective (not that unusual for a plasma TV) and standard-definition pictures are spoilt by some awful colour bleed (colours appeared misaligned and sometimes appeared slightly to the left of the image). There's a lack of fine detail and we spotted jerky motion on our panning test sequence, though Freeview pictures actually fared a little better. The soft finish gives Freeview a warm, natural feel and the viewing angle is fine, which means the picture doesn't fade when viewed from the side.

However, if you're after a big screen for watching high definition, forget about this Samsung. The HD picture is simply not up to standard. It looks too soft for HD and our Blu-ray test disc revealed some jittery motion. Fine detail is too coarse and the screen far too reflective to make for a rewarding watch.

The built-in speakers delivered a satisfactory performance in our tests. The sound is surprisingly dynamic and clear, though the bass feels too thumpy and higher frequencies sound slightly unnatural. Our experts' only serious quibble was the irritating background buzz.

This TV is generally easy to use, mainly thanks to some practical design touches, though it isn't without it's fair share of niggles. The EPG and remote control are well laid out, but we found it hard to tell whether the touch-senstitive controls on the TV had been pressed properly or not and the remote is a bit too long.

This Samsung doesn't have all the latest features (internet access, media streaming, Freeview HD tuner) and is missing some of the basics we'd expect to find as standard. For instance, it has only one Scart for connecting to standard-definition kit (such as a DVD player or VCR) and, though it has three HDMI inputs for HD equipement, we uncovered a glitch with the widescreen switching.

There's a digital optical output for connecting to surround-sound systems, but it has no dedicated analogue stereo output for connecting to a hi-fi. You can connect to a PC and turn the TV into a computer monitor, though the only supported resolution is a 4:3 (non-widescreen) format. It has a USB port for connecting a camera, camcorder or MP3 player (so you can view photos, video or listen to music), but we found it stretched 4:3 images to fill the screen.

On the plus side, the TV supports audio description (AD), an additional narrative for visually impaired people. Helpfully, Samsung has included an AD button on the remote, avoiding the need to delve into a menu system.

This is one of the most energy-efficient plasma TVs we've tested, though it still uses around 50 watts more than an equivalent-sized LCD set. Nevertheless, hats off to Samsung for getting power use down to around 145 watts when switched on, 104 watts with energy-saving mode selected and just 92 watts with the ambient light sensor switched on in a dimly lit room. Screen blanking is impressive too, cutting power to below 20 watts when the TV's tuned in to digital radio. We also liked how you can adjust the volume without the picture reappearing (as it does on most sets).

Despite the HD TV logo, this set doesn't actually have a Freeview HD tuner built in.

Pros: Competitive price, energy-efficient

Cons: Messy, overly sharp picture, no Freeview HD tuner, background buzz, lots of feature glitches

Last edited by jods; 21 November 2010 at 01:27 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buckerz69
Subaru Parts
7
08 October 2015 07:51 PM
STERNRITTER
ScoobyNet General
5
29 September 2015 09:05 PM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
29 September 2015 02:18 PM
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
24
29 September 2015 09:07 AM
jobegold@hotmail.co.uk
ScoobyNet General
2
27 September 2015 09:44 PM



Quick Reply: IS this 50" tv worth it for £418



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 AM.