Every Sperm apparently isn't sacred anymore..
21 November 2010, 10:07 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Every Sperm apparently isn't sacred anymore..
According to the Pope: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11804943
Monty Python need to re-write their song ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8&NR=1
Catholics, to see what fun you are in for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifgHHhw_6g8
Monty Python need to re-write their song ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8&NR=1
Catholics, to see what fun you are in for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifgHHhw_6g8
21 November 2010, 10:23 AM
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The BBC R4 late night news reporter on this was John *****........
And on this morning's news the Vatican were reported as saying that the pope was speaking from experience in these matters?
dl
And on this morning's news the Vatican were reported as saying that the pope was speaking from experience in these matters?
dl
Trending Topics
21 November 2010, 11:11 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is quite a climbdown alright. The original teaching was that contraception was wrong because sex was primarily for producing children and therefore it would be morally wrong to prevent a child from being conceived. Some would say it was really to extend the population of the Catholic religion.
These days in general sex is regarded more for pure enjoyment and becoming pregnant is by no means the major ambition behind it except for when a couple really do want to have a child.
It is obvious of course that wide sexual experience carries the danger of catching disease unless precautions are taken. The Catholic Church's answer was that wide sexual experience was morally wrong except between a married couple and they had to accept the risk of pregnancy.
When it comes to homosexual activity, the risks are obvious as well as the necessary precautions. The Catholic Church did not of course accept that homosexual activity was acceptable in its teachings. In order to forstall the obvious comments, paedophilea was of course completely against the Church's teachings regardless of the offences by priests who were acting disgracefully and against the teachings of the religion.
By accepting the possibility that the use of condoms could be acceptable in certain cases. whatever they might be and which is an amazing relaxation, the Pope is going against the basic teachings of the Church which seems to be a pretty dangerous step to take from his point of view. He may well experience a pretty strong backlash and could destabilise the religion.
Les
These days in general sex is regarded more for pure enjoyment and becoming pregnant is by no means the major ambition behind it except for when a couple really do want to have a child.
It is obvious of course that wide sexual experience carries the danger of catching disease unless precautions are taken. The Catholic Church's answer was that wide sexual experience was morally wrong except between a married couple and they had to accept the risk of pregnancy.
When it comes to homosexual activity, the risks are obvious as well as the necessary precautions. The Catholic Church did not of course accept that homosexual activity was acceptable in its teachings. In order to forstall the obvious comments, paedophilea was of course completely against the Church's teachings regardless of the offences by priests who were acting disgracefully and against the teachings of the religion.
By accepting the possibility that the use of condoms could be acceptable in certain cases. whatever they might be and which is an amazing relaxation, the Pope is going against the basic teachings of the Church which seems to be a pretty dangerous step to take from his point of view. He may well experience a pretty strong backlash and could destabilise the religion.
Les
21 November 2010, 11:40 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
21 November 2010, 11:42 PM
#14
Ghey is just un-natural - fact
Tribal BJ's - well I'll stop at "Tribal" !!! - Not Normal
Last edited by jods; 21 November 2010 at 11:44 PM.
22 November 2010, 12:43 AM
#15
Would you want a baby as a result of every bit of nookie you had? If heaven forbid that would happen.
I'm not 100% sure of your point, but there are alot of people out there that don't want children (for a variety of reasons), does that then mean they shouldn't be able to have sex (i.e. have it but use contraception)?
22 November 2010, 09:56 AM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
