Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

A slag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03 February 2014, 03:17 PM
  #1  
RobJenks
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
RobJenks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,475
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default A slag

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ford-them.html
RobJenks is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 03:42 PM
  #2  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Clearly not heard of family planning...

Or has she? ( seems to be getting by own her own, at our expense)

Last edited by dpb; 03 February 2014 at 03:43 PM.
dpb is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 03:57 PM
  #3  
wayne9t9
Scooby Regular
 
wayne9t9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Not the Wild West
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wheres the father(s) ?
wayne9t9 is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:03 PM
  #4  
Lydia72
Scooby Regular
 
Lydia72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why is she a slag? I'd expect a woman of her age to have had sex at least eight times. All the children are to the same father, she's the one left holding the babies, but you're not calling him are you?
Lydia72 is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:12 PM
  #5  
joe v3sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
joe v3sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

She's a flipping disgrace. £2000 a month!
I really don't see how on earth she's entitled to that kind of money. It's a joke!

Last edited by joe v3sti; 03 February 2014 at 04:14 PM.
joe v3sti is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:18 PM
  #6  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

She's no fool, 8 kids £2k a month and the dad hides out claiming elsewhere no doubt and probably sub letting a flat somewhere that's being paid for by the tax working people pay, seen it loads of times they get more if they pretend to live apart.

On off relationship my **** only need to look at the kids and their ages to see it's way more on than off, by the looks of it she's on her back all the time and he's never off her.
ditchmyster is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:25 PM
  #7  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another week, another benefit scandal story in the Daily Mail, another thread about it on Scoobynet... sigh!
f1_fan is offline  

Trending Topics

Old 03 February 2014, 04:30 PM
  #8  
joe v3sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
joe v3sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Obviously the dont have a TV to watch in an evening!

Could buy one with that 2k
joe v3sti is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:40 PM
  #9  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Another week, another benefit scandal story in the Daily Mail, another thread about it on Scoobynet... sigh!
Tragic isn't it.
neil-h is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 04:58 PM
  #10  
specialx
Former Sponsor
 
specialx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: WWW.SCOOBYCLINIC.COM
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why do I live in a country where ignorance is funded and hard working families are taxed to breaking point? Time to move me thinks!
specialx is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 06:00 PM
  #11  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Father must be sex-starved or blind. She's a scraggy skank.

And why is he not paying anything towards those kids?

Mrs Alcazar and me could only afford two and we WORKED FULL TIME!
alcazar is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 06:03 PM
  #12  
the shreksta
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
the shreksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: hinckley
Posts: 8,445
Received 496 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Another week, another benefit scandal story in the Daily Mail, another thread about it on Scoobynet... sigh!
makes a change from threat of super storms and the daily express
the shreksta is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 06:32 PM
  #13  
pooeater
Scooby Regular
 
pooeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

once you try black you'll never go back hehe
pooeater is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 06:41 PM
  #14  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I must remember to call my accountant tomorrow to see if there is something he can do to increase my tax exposure.
cster is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 06:55 PM
  #15  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Another week, another benefit scandal story in the Daily Mail, another thread about it on Scoobynet... sigh!
I don't see what this has to do with anything. The newspaper it is in is irrelevant, this Lady clearly has 8 children, no sign of any father and I would imagine the story is straight forward, unless they are directly quoting someone on events that haven't happened.
What the Daily Mail do is highlight stories, with a little spice added to it, which genuinely effect 90% of the British population, and obviously stir up emotion. There are people like this in area's like where I live. I know of someone doing similar, it's wrong but in reality it's a flawed system that should not exist. Do you honestly think if The Daily Mail was shut down tomorrow people like this would suddenly cease to exist?.

You could say another day on scoobynet, another comment from F1_fan on the daily mail .

Last edited by Kwik; 03 February 2014 at 06:56 PM.
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:18 PM
  #16  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
I don't see what this has to do with anything. The newspaper it is in is irrelevant, this Lady clearly has 8 children, no sign of any father and I would imagine the story is straight forward, unless they are directly quoting someone on events that haven't happened.
What the Daily Mail do is highlight stories, with a little spice added to it, which genuinely effect 90% of the British population, and obviously stir up emotion. There are people like this in area's like where I live. I know of someone doing similar, it's wrong but in reality it's a flawed system that should not exist. Do you honestly think if The Daily Mail was shut down tomorrow people like this would suddenly cease to exist?.

You could say another day on scoobynet, another comment from F1_fan on the daily mail .
They are sensationalist stories about an absolutely minsicule percentage of the population designed to demonise benefit claimants in general by outraging thickos not clever enough to realise when they are being manipulated.... QED!
f1_fan is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:31 PM
  #17  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
They are sensationalist stories about an absolutely minsicule percentage of the population designed to demonise benefit claimants in general by outraging thickos not clever enough to realise when they are being manipulated.... QED!
You assume they are a miniscule percentage. Sometimes your hatred blinds you from the truth.
Ask yourself if it really is only the idiots that get emotional over stories like this, or are you just living in an area unaffected by these kind of situations, so assume it's a minor percentage.

People that get annoyed at this are the people that see it day by day.

Unless of course you can provide accurate statistics that support your argument?

Last edited by Kwik; 03 February 2014 at 07:33 PM.
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:41 PM
  #18  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Never mind that skanky clowns pocket - did no one notice another story on that page?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...M1-M6-M25.html

No doubt the fines are needed to raise enough funds for said skank and her ilk.
zip106 is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:42 PM
  #19  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
No doubt the fines are needed to raise enough funds for said skank and her ilk.
She doesn't exist, it's the media and the kids are photoshopped into the pictures.
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:44 PM
  #20  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
She doesn't exist, it's the media and the kids are photoshopped into the pictures.
Let's hope those ****ing cameras are too.
zip106 is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:46 PM
  #21  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
Let's hope those ****ing cameras are too.
If it was in the Daily Mail then it was just to annoy you, not a shred of truth in it all. They are probably just there to take pictures of flowers and fluffy bunnies.
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 07:52 PM
  #22  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
You assume they are a miniscule percentage. Sometimes your hatred blinds you from the truth.

Ask yourself if it really is only the idiots that get emotional over stories like this, or are you just living in an area unaffected by these kind of situations, so assume it's a minor percentage.

People that get annoyed at this are the people that see it day by day.

Unless of course you can provide accurate statistics that support your argument?
No it's a fact that women with 8 kids and no father present getting £2000 a month on benefits are a miniscule percentage of the population. You provide the statistics otherwise as you are the one making the stupid claims here.

As for the story I think the country faces much larger issues than some bint claiming benefits. How about the EU and the level of corrupton within and how it would seem that most of the population want us out or the education system being railroaded by Gove into whatever twisted vision he has for it this week or the fact that people diagnosed with terminal illnesses can't get benefits for months or the fact that HS2 has been given the green light while the Environment Agency has no money to sort out the floods etc. etc. but no peope like you would rather get upset about a woman claiming for 8 kids on benefits!
f1_fan is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 08:04 PM
  #23  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
No it's a fact that women with 8 kids and no father present getting £2000 a month on benefits are a miniscule percentage of the population. You provide the statistics otherwise as you are the one making the stupid claims here.

As for the story I think the country faces much larger issues than some bint claiming benefits. How about the EU and the level of corrupton within and how it would seem that most of the population want us out or the education system being railroaded by Gove into whatever twisted vision he has for it this week or the fact that people diagnosed with terminal illnesses can't get benefits for months or the fact that HS2 has been given the green light while the Environment Agency has no money to sort out the floods etc. etc. but no peope like you would rather get upset about a woman claiming for 8 kids on benefits!
I'm not upset, as I said I know of people doing similar. It's wrong, but they aren't raping or murdering people.
You get upset whenever the Daily Mail write a story, whether there's truth in it or not.
This did interest me though....
or the fact that people diagnosed with terminal illnesses can't get benefits for months
But you are O.K. with a perfectly healthy Lady getting £2k per month?
Also, the people you regularly "wish a terminal illness on", do you want them to get benefits? .
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 08:29 PM
  #24  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
I'm not upset, as I said I know of people doing similar. It's wrong, but they aren't raping or murdering people.
You get upset whenever the Daily Mail write a story, whether there's truth in it or not.
So you get all moralistic about it when you read it in the paper yet I'll bet you've done nothing about the people you (claim to) know who are doing this... well there's some hypocrisy to add to your other failings!

Originally Posted by Kwik
This did interest me though....

But you are O.K. with a perfectly healthy Lady getting £2k per month?
It's not a question of being OK with it, it just doesn't register at all highly on my personal 'outraged of Scoobynet' meter as the two stories have no connection. If this lady's benefits were stopped tomorrow people with a terminal illness wouldn't get their benefit any quicker as the money is not the issue, it's the failing of the system!

Originally Posted by Kwik
Also, the people you regularly "wish a terminal illness on", do you want them to get benefits? .
Regularly??? Once! (although it couild be twice the way you are going ) And they were thieves! So no I don't want them to get benefits, quite the opposite!

Edit: I have just rmemembered who you are, you're that buffoon from the Mercedes thread who knows nothing about cars. I knew there was a reason your posts were so familiarly moronic
f1_fan is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 08:41 PM
  #25  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
So you get all moralistic about it when you read it in the paper yet I'll bet you've done nothing about the people you (claim to) know who are doing this... well there's some hypocrisy to add to your other failings!
But wishing people terminal illness, then moaning that people who have terminal illness don't get their benefits quickly isn't hypocritical?.

Originally Posted by f1_fan
It's not a question of being OK with it, it just doesn't register at all highly on my personal 'outraged of Scoobynet' meter as the two stories have no connection. If this lady's benefits were stopped tomorrow people with a terminal illness wouldn't get their benefit any quicker as the money is not the issue, it's the failing of the system!
Would that be the same system that outrages people that a healthy young Lady that is perfectly capable of working claims a ridiculous amount of money per month?.

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Regularly??? Once! (although it couild be twice the way you are going ) And they were thieves! So no I don't want them to get benefits, quite the opposite!
Well, here's you wishing someone a fatal heart attack a few days ago over something trivial again. Post 66.
https://www.scoobynet.com/995680-rachel-riley-3.html
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 08:55 PM
  #26  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
But wishing people terminal illness, then moaning that people who have terminal illness don't get their benefits quickly isn't hypocritical?.
Not really, I wish Lee Rigby's killers could get one, but would still like people who don't deserve one to get their benefits. Or are you telling me you wouldn't be happy if those murderers had something nasty happen to them? OK if you're not as every cause has its sympathisers

Originally Posted by Kwik
Would that be the same system that outrages people that a healthy young Lady that is perfectly capable of working claims a ridiculous amount of money per month?.
It's a question of scale and at one end you have the utter insiginificance of one person getting benefit for their 8 kids and at the other people not getting what they need as they prepare to die. If you see the former as more important then no worries, every cause has its sympathisers

Originally Posted by Kwik
Well, here's you wishing someone a fatal heart attack a few days ago over something trivial again. Post 66.
https://www.scoobynet.com/995680-rachel-riley-3.html
I think even you can quite clearly see that that exchange was tongue in cheek, but if you wish to take it seriously that's entirely up to you. Please feel free to RTM the post and start a nice little crusade. They may agree with you, after all every cause has its sympathisers

PS Nice to know I have yet another f**king stalker
f1_fan is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 09:19 PM
  #27  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Not really, I wish Lee Rigby's killers could get one, but would still like people who don't deserve one to get their benefits. Or are you telling me you wouldn't be happy if those murderers had something nasty happen to them? OK if you're not as every cause has its sympathisers

It's a question of scale and at one end you have the utter insiginificance of one person getting benefit for their 8 kids and at the other people not getting what they need as they prepare to die. If you see the former as more important then no worries, every cause has its sympathisers

I think even you can quite clearly see that that exchange was tongue in cheek, but if you wish to take it seriously that's entirely up to you. Please feel free to RTM the post and start a nice little crusade. They may agree with you, after all every cause has its sympathisers

PS Nice to know I have yet another f**king stalker
Not at all, I find most of what you write on here quite funny. I can't be arsed to argue, as in all the time I've been on here I don't think I've ever once read you say you were wrong. I also understand you enjoy an argument, so won't allow myself to get annoyed at anything you say. You even still think you were right to say internet pirates deserve to get cancer.

A flawed system won't pay out to people with a terminal illness but will to a healthy lazy girl with 8 kids and the father hiding in the loft. Same system, the general public would have the same reaction regardless of what paper it is in.
Kwik is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 09:26 PM
  #28  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
Not at all, I find most of what you write on here quite funny. I can't be arsed to argue, as in all the time I've been on here I don't think I've ever once read you say you were wrong.
I have been...once I think!

Originally Posted by Kwik
You even still think you were right to say internet pirates deserve to get cancer.
I'm not allowed to say on here, but I think that answers your question. I don't like people who steal from me, end of!

Originally Posted by Kwik
A flawed system won't pay out to people with a terminal illness but will to a healthy lazy girl with 8 kids and the father hiding in the loft. Same system, the general public would have the same reaction regardless of what paper it is in.
No you misunderstand, it will pay out, it just takes too bloody long about it, it's not the same argument no matter which way you cut it! One is trivial, the other is not. The Mail and its ilk just don't like reporting real news... I will leave you to work out why... it doesn't take a genius!

Last edited by f1_fan; 03 February 2014 at 09:29 PM.
f1_fan is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 09:36 PM
  #29  
Lydia72
Scooby Regular
 
Lydia72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
the fact that people diagnosed with terminal illnesses can't get benefits for months
What's the score with this?
When I worked there we had something called 'Special Rules' where you got paid more or less straight-away if you had less than six months to live, have they done away with that now?
Lydia72 is offline  
Old 03 February 2014, 09:38 PM
  #30  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whilst not wanting to defend promiscuity and lack of patriarchal responsibility, I find the whole tone of the story reprehensible. Note how emotive language is used to evoke a reaction. The whole story is typical Daily Fail fodder and I would suggest simply published for a reaction. A reaction that is easy to evoke from those who fail to see the bigger picture. Demonising benefit claimants is flavour of the month at the moment. The Daily Fail it seems is turning it in to a national sport.


A banker, a Daily Mail reader and a benefit claimant are sitting at a table sharing 12 biscuits. The banker takes 11 and says to the Daily Mail reader: “Watch out for the benefit claimant, he wants your biscuit”
Maz is offline  


Quick Reply: A slag



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.