Any practical cars quicker than my 03WRX PPP - BUT cheaper to run?
#1
Any practical cars quicker than my 03WRX PPP - BUT cheaper to run?
Need to cut down on running costs, BUT I love having a fast car. Are there any cars that are as practical as my scoob, are faster (through the gears) but are actually cheaper to run/own.
I keep thinking she'll have to go, but whenever I consider other fast cars I can't see anything that would give me the same (or more) speed whilst saving me money on running costs (servicing, fuel and insurance). Oh and needs to be reliable too....
I keep thinking she'll have to go, but whenever I consider other fast cars I can't see anything that would give me the same (or more) speed whilst saving me money on running costs (servicing, fuel and insurance). Oh and needs to be reliable too....
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
330d 204 BHP chipped, 330i, S3, S4, TT, M3, M5, Octavia vRS, Leon Cupra R, Fabia vRS, Ibiza - there is a new Cupra with a diesel - quite quick I believe, Clio 172/182, 150 TDis chipped, all worth thinking about?
Variety of prices, speeds and running costs there, just a few ideas.
Variety of prices, speeds and running costs there, just a few ideas.
#4
Originally Posted by john banks
330d 204 BHP chipped, 330i, S3, S4, TT, M3, M5, Octavia vRS, Leon Cupra R, Fabia vRS, Ibiza - there is a new Cupra with a diesel - quite quick I believe, Clio 172/182, 150 TDis chipped, all worth thinking about?
Variety of prices, speeds and running costs there, just a few ideas.
Variety of prices, speeds and running costs there, just a few ideas.
S4, M3, M5 - surely more expensive to run than my 03WRX PPP?
S3, Octavia vRS, Cupra R, Fabia vRS, Ibiza Cupra, Clio 172/182, 150TDi - surely all slower than my car??
TT - not practical
330d, 330i - hmm.....although I can't see they are much cheaper to run??
When talking about running costs I am ignoring depreciation. Just looking at combined fuel/servicing/insurance (in other words actual monthly outgoings).
Remember am looking for something at least as quick if not quicker than my 03WRX PPP AND cheaper to run. Must be practical and reliable too.
#5
LCR 210/225 with a remap from Jabba/Revo (£500-750)
280bhp/300lbft going through 2 wheels instead of 4. Seriously quick! It won't suffer the Tx losses the 4wd scooby does.
Won't be as quick as a scooby off the mark due to traction but once it hits 3rd+ it'll move like a missile.
Top end goes off the 160mph clock. Looks good inside and out and has 18'' and 4 pot brembos as standard.
280bhp/300lbft going through 2 wheels instead of 4. Seriously quick! It won't suffer the Tx losses the 4wd scooby does.
Won't be as quick as a scooby off the mark due to traction but once it hits 3rd+ it'll move like a missile.
Top end goes off the 160mph clock. Looks good inside and out and has 18'' and 4 pot brembos as standard.
Last edited by Mitchy260; 25 October 2004 at 01:53 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
M5 might cost similar to your WRX to run? Sounds ludicrous, but fuel economy is similar, I'm getting similar quotes to insure one as a WRX PPP or STi. Octavia vRS chipped can be quite quick indeed and they cost little to buy, as can the 182. Chip a 150 TDi to 180-190 and it could be fun too. 330i or d could be cheap on fuel, servicing, depreciation.
Depends on where you want them to be quick. A lot of these cars in the real world may be nearly as quick as a WRX PPP. You'll probably have to compromise somewhere.
Depends on where you want them to be quick. A lot of these cars in the real world may be nearly as quick as a WRX PPP. You'll probably have to compromise somewhere.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Mitchy260
LCR 210/225 with a remap from Jabba/Revo (£500-750)
280bhp/300lbft going through 2 wheels instead of 4. Seriously quick! It won't suffer the Tx losses the 4wd scooby does.
Won't be as quick as a scooby off the mark due to traction but once it hits 3rd+ it'll move like a missile.
Top end goes off the 160mph clock. Looks good inside and out and has 18'' and 4 pot brembos as standard.
280bhp/300lbft going through 2 wheels instead of 4. Seriously quick! It won't suffer the Tx losses the 4wd scooby does.
Won't be as quick as a scooby off the mark due to traction but once it hits 3rd+ it'll move like a missile.
Top end goes off the 160mph clock. Looks good inside and out and has 18'' and 4 pot brembos as standard.
Hmmm, sounds tempting Practical, quick + cheaper to run. Although I'm guessing the tyre bill at least wouldn't be much different to a scoob with all that going through the fronts!! Wonder if fuel economy on a Jabbad LCR 225 would be better or worse than mine???
Sulli - mine is a wagon so the practicality would be the same Aren't the classics more expensive on servicing due to shorter intervals?
#17
Interesting thread......
Sold my 03 WRX PPP for similar financial reasons earlier in the year and am currently running a 'regular' 180 bhp Leon Cupra.
I also looked at the Cupra R as well and the one I drove felt almost as fast as the scoob if not as fast. It's a very good drive as well and a great package/price, obviously wet weather traction is nowhere near the scoob but it's pretty good for a powerful fwd hatch.
I opted for the regular Cupra on financial grounds and it's not bad, it's not exactly going to tear up the tarmac but it's brisk, practical, well built and costs a hell of a lot less to run! For instance insurance was 60% less than the scoob!
I think an LCR with a REVO/Jabba remap would be a very good alternative
Sold my 03 WRX PPP for similar financial reasons earlier in the year and am currently running a 'regular' 180 bhp Leon Cupra.
I also looked at the Cupra R as well and the one I drove felt almost as fast as the scoob if not as fast. It's a very good drive as well and a great package/price, obviously wet weather traction is nowhere near the scoob but it's pretty good for a powerful fwd hatch.
I opted for the regular Cupra on financial grounds and it's not bad, it's not exactly going to tear up the tarmac but it's brisk, practical, well built and costs a hell of a lot less to run! For instance insurance was 60% less than the scoob!
I think an LCR with a REVO/Jabba remap would be a very good alternative
#18
Originally Posted by Andy Hamilton
Interesting thread......
Sold my 03 WRX PPP for similar financial reasons earlier in the year and am currently running a 'regular' 180 bhp Leon Cupra.
I also looked at the Cupra R as well and the one I drove felt almost as fast as the scoob if not as fast. It's a very good drive as well and a great package/price, obviously wet weather traction is nowhere near the scoob but it's pretty good for a powerful fwd hatch.
I opted for the regular Cupra on financial grounds and it's not bad, it's not exactly going to tear up the tarmac but it's brisk, practical, well built and costs a hell of a lot less to run! For instance insurance was 60% less than the scoob!
I think an LCR with a REVO/Jabba remap would be a very good alternative
Sold my 03 WRX PPP for similar financial reasons earlier in the year and am currently running a 'regular' 180 bhp Leon Cupra.
I also looked at the Cupra R as well and the one I drove felt almost as fast as the scoob if not as fast. It's a very good drive as well and a great package/price, obviously wet weather traction is nowhere near the scoob but it's pretty good for a powerful fwd hatch.
I opted for the regular Cupra on financial grounds and it's not bad, it's not exactly going to tear up the tarmac but it's brisk, practical, well built and costs a hell of a lot less to run! For instance insurance was 60% less than the scoob!
I think an LCR with a REVO/Jabba remap would be a very good alternative
Thanks Andy - that's v helpful
Out of interest how do you find fuel costs and servicing costs compared to the scoob??
TBH I'm really struggling to sell mine. Haven't had any interest whatsoever for several weeks now. I keep dropping the price but it really is depressing how little it's worth already. Feels like I'll be giving it away at the end of the day.
Of course whatever price I get for my scoob will determine my budget for a new car
#20
Servicing wise I don't think there will be a lot in it as they are both 12 months/10,000 miles intervals, the Leon may be slighter cheaper but not had a service on mine yet!
Fuel economy is much better and on a run the computer reads over 35 mpg, obviously goes down in town but I've never managed over 25mpg in any of the scoobs I've owned and I've had 6 of them! monthly fuel bill is definitely a fair bit less though. Insurance was the final nail in the coffin for me with the WRX PPP......
The Cupra Diesel (or FR as they are now called) is a very good car worth considering if you do a lot of miles and is pretty quick, also responds well to a remap My brother runs an A3 Quattro TDi sport and gets 500 miles from a tank......
Fuel economy is much better and on a run the computer reads over 35 mpg, obviously goes down in town but I've never managed over 25mpg in any of the scoobs I've owned and I've had 6 of them! monthly fuel bill is definitely a fair bit less though. Insurance was the final nail in the coffin for me with the WRX PPP......
The Cupra Diesel (or FR as they are now called) is a very good car worth considering if you do a lot of miles and is pretty quick, also responds well to a remap My brother runs an A3 Quattro TDi sport and gets 500 miles from a tank......
#21
Originally Posted by john banks
How much are you after for the 03 WRX PPP?
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel economy WRX03 PPP:
I managed 33.3 MPG on a long run this week. 355 miles before I filled up, the warning light was not on, and there were 2.5 gallons left in the tank. This was mostly at a constant 70 on the motorway, but stuck in traffic (I'd guess about an hour at <5MPH) going through a few roadwork sections.
Not bad at all.
Staying on the wrong side of 90 will see the fuel economy drop to 26MPG.
I managed 33.3 MPG on a long run this week. 355 miles before I filled up, the warning light was not on, and there were 2.5 gallons left in the tank. This was mostly at a constant 70 on the motorway, but stuck in traffic (I'd guess about an hour at <5MPH) going through a few roadwork sections.
Not bad at all.
Staying on the wrong side of 90 will see the fuel economy drop to 26MPG.
#24
Originally Posted by john banks
Same price as a new Euro import then. That might be your difficulty? Unfair I know, and I know you have the PPP as well.
I don't think 'unfair' quite sums up the emotions I am feeling right now about the residual values of Subarus!!!!!!
The car cost me just under £24k 18 months ago and you're telling me it's worth what less than £15k now? So a drop of nearly 40% in value in that time. Unbelievable.
Jeez I wish I'd bought an R32 (which I did consider) - look at their residual values now!!!
And those Euro imports, that is £15995 OTR with the exact same spec as a standard UK WRX is it?
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a land full of corsets
Posts: 9,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re the Octavia:
Had mine for 32 months, did 138k miles in it.
Fuel economy; motorways cuising at 80-85 indicated, I'd get about 38mpg, A roads about 35, brisk driving on A roads about 30-32, trackdays about 12 and the Ring about 8-10 mpg.
Servicing costs: You can either go variable servicing or fixed 10k servicing. I went 10k due to my mileage and needing to know when it would need a service. Costs were:
10k = £58
20k = £148
30k = £58
40k = £200
50k = £347 - I had a new clutch fitted as a precaution
60k = £372 - Had cambelt done, again a precaution as I reckon the recomended 120k interval for it is way too long
70k = £65
80k = £220
90k = £78
100k = £189
110k = £68
120k = £550 - had cambelt and clutch changed again
130k = £93
My car had a very hard life! Of the 138k on the clock when I sold it at 32 month old, nearly 12k were track miles
So, other than services listed above, what did I break?
2 x NSF wheel bearings
1 x NSF wishbone bush
1 x main cooling fan (led to overheating problems at the Ring as it had packed up)
1 x OSF wheel bearing
1 x engine @ 135k miles. The MAF had degraded, much like Scoob ones have been known to do
Tyres, even with track use lasted about 15 - 20k for a set. Insurance was about £500 per year, all mods declared, fully comp.
Any questions about the Octy, ask over on www.briskoda.net quite a few Scoob converts on there.
Did I like mine and would I recommend it? Yep So much so, I bought another Octavia (diesel this time due to my silly mileage ).
Oh, almost forgot, depreciation. Bought new for £14,100. Sold at 32 months with 138k on the clock and paintwork that looked like it had been blasted by a shotgun, for £6,500.
As for whether it'd be as quick / quicker than a PPP WRX, perish the thought
Had mine for 32 months, did 138k miles in it.
Fuel economy; motorways cuising at 80-85 indicated, I'd get about 38mpg, A roads about 35, brisk driving on A roads about 30-32, trackdays about 12 and the Ring about 8-10 mpg.
Servicing costs: You can either go variable servicing or fixed 10k servicing. I went 10k due to my mileage and needing to know when it would need a service. Costs were:
10k = £58
20k = £148
30k = £58
40k = £200
50k = £347 - I had a new clutch fitted as a precaution
60k = £372 - Had cambelt done, again a precaution as I reckon the recomended 120k interval for it is way too long
70k = £65
80k = £220
90k = £78
100k = £189
110k = £68
120k = £550 - had cambelt and clutch changed again
130k = £93
My car had a very hard life! Of the 138k on the clock when I sold it at 32 month old, nearly 12k were track miles
So, other than services listed above, what did I break?
2 x NSF wheel bearings
1 x NSF wishbone bush
1 x main cooling fan (led to overheating problems at the Ring as it had packed up)
1 x OSF wheel bearing
1 x engine @ 135k miles. The MAF had degraded, much like Scoob ones have been known to do
Tyres, even with track use lasted about 15 - 20k for a set. Insurance was about £500 per year, all mods declared, fully comp.
Any questions about the Octy, ask over on www.briskoda.net quite a few Scoob converts on there.
Did I like mine and would I recommend it? Yep So much so, I bought another Octavia (diesel this time due to my silly mileage ).
Oh, almost forgot, depreciation. Bought new for £14,100. Sold at 32 months with 138k on the clock and paintwork that looked like it had been blasted by a shotgun, for £6,500.
As for whether it'd be as quick / quicker than a PPP WRX, perish the thought
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Use the back of a What Car as a guide. Performance figures and servicing costs are documented and are a pretty good guide.
I played this game about 4 months ago myself due to running costs and all that came close were hot hatches, and without mods they dont really come close enough or I guess!
Anyway I'm still on my 99 classic which in 18 months has also lost 40% of its value!!
Dont change unless you're absolutely certain that its for all the right reasons...
P
I played this game about 4 months ago myself due to running costs and all that came close were hot hatches, and without mods they dont really come close enough or I guess!
Anyway I'm still on my 99 classic which in 18 months has also lost 40% of its value!!
Dont change unless you're absolutely certain that its for all the right reasons...
P
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM