Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

So oil burners can out-accelerate scoobys!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 January 2005, 05:51 PM
  #1  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool So oil burners can out-accelerate scoobys!

I have always been a bit of a fan of beefy oil burners an it came as quite some shock to see the performance stats of the new 535d which is bascially a twin turbo version of the companys 3.0d powerplant. At 272bhp and with more torque than an oil tanker the car, despite its 1750kg kerbweight, hit 60mph from rest in 5.8s and 100mph in 14.6 That 0-100mph is quicker than a launched classic impreza and the real world 60-100mph time is closing in on P1 territory at 8.8s and is more than enough to pull from a classic shape scooby and frankly obliterate a bugeye! And yet, if you want 35mpg is available and possibly 40 if you drive like a total fairy!!

I don't care who you are but that is mighty impressive!! Consider also that the engine would no doubt fit into the 3-series which is considerably lighter than the 5-series and we could be looking at 335d's matching STI's and of course totally wasting them in gear and in the mid-range. Interesting stuff

Mind you, £39k before goodies isn't cheap and they are probably costly to run. And yes, I know..........a twin turbo 3.0 petrol engine would be good for 500bhp and more
Old 12 January 2005, 07:14 PM
  #2  
Cosworth427
Scooby Regular
 
Cosworth427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Apples to oranges. A big exec saloon vs a small family saloon, but it will bound to hurt a few egos.
Old 12 January 2005, 07:45 PM
  #3  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had some minor ego damage at the hands of the new 530D (one down from the 535) last night, was in my Rover 200 BRM (Yes I know), close run thing considering he was doing the BMW 'creep', i.e. the un-sporting method of starting moving before the lights change, sure enough they are very quick. I think he got a bit of a surprise to be honest, had to let him in, dont think he was expecting any challenge to his diesel tank. Well done 40 grand BMW beats 3 grand Rover.
Old 12 January 2005, 07:46 PM
  #4  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

only prob with turbo d's is the power comes on strong threw a very short rev range.
but they do pull well turbo d's
Old 12 January 2005, 07:48 PM
  #5  
Sith
Scooby Regular
 
Sith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lucky mine isn't standard then.........
Old 12 January 2005, 08:01 PM
  #7  
Mmmmm
Scooby Regular
 
Mmmmm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More tests 535d

Test in ams 21/2004
Gewicht 1800 kg
0 - 80 km/h 4,6 s
0 - 100 km/h 6,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 9,2 s
0 - 130 km/h 10,6 s
0 - 140 km/h 12,1 s
0 - 160 km/h 16,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 20,7 s

Test in sport auto 10/2004
Gewicht 1794 kg
0 - 80 km/h 4,5 s
0 - 100 km/h 6,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 9,0 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 11,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 15,1 s
0 - 180 km/h 19,3 s
0 - 200 km/h - s

If they drop this engine in the new 3 series it would make quite a quick car
Old 12 January 2005, 08:19 PM
  #8  
workshy_fopp
Scooby Regular
 
workshy_fopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a shot of the g/f's dad's 535d Sport over Christmas. Hard to tell if it's "proper" fast as it was so refined, you just floor it and it shows some numbers on the speedo. Only 1500 miles on the clock though, so should be plenty more to come. Love the look of the 5-series now, especially with the sport kit. Oh and it's only averaging 25mpg on the fuel computer so far, whereas his old 528i did 29.999mpg all the time.
Old 12 January 2005, 08:32 PM
  #9  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1500 miles is still very tight for a diesel so it should get faster and more ecomonical with more miles.

The point of my post was not a direct comparison as that would be stupid but only to show how fast diesels are now and how a 335d would be utterly rapid
Old 12 January 2005, 08:50 PM
  #10  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wonder if they'll do a 135d?
Old 12 January 2005, 08:58 PM
  #11  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

imagine! A 135xd csl Boost turned up for 290bhp in a stripped 1-serious running a 4wd platform
Old 12 January 2005, 09:39 PM
  #12  
cheddar bob
Scooby Regular
 
cheddar bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fair Play to the oil burning deveopment, but the major advantage/selling point of better fuel economy with diesels sharp gets smaller when looking at high performance diesel engines compared to similar price/powered petrol equivelants(sp?). Not to mention as someone has already said how short the power band is anyway with them, which makes it less flexible although agree easier to drive fast especially for 'lazy' drivers who'd choose torque over power.
Old 12 January 2005, 09:53 PM
  #13  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A few words that completely make Diesels however powerful, redundant for the keen driver,

(Hail Mary before we start if its Italian)

Waarpp, (add a tschhh here if its a turbo) Waaaaaaaarrpp, waaaaarrrrpppppppp, Braaaaaaapp, ding, ding, bang, Waaaarrrppp (Add a clatter and an abrupt silence here if its a Rover), Waaaaarppp, bam bam bam(oops rev limiter), waaarrrrrpppp etc etc do we get the idea.
Old 13 January 2005, 03:04 AM
  #14  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you the Crazy Frog?
Old 13 January 2005, 09:20 AM
  #15  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scoobs are the fastest cars in the world.

Don't be silly you lot.
Old 13 January 2005, 12:08 PM
  #16  
MattOz
Scooby Regular
 
MattOz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Saxo,

The 335d is coming in 2006. The new 3 series is out in April and will have 2 litre power plants to begin with but may be joined by a 330Ti petrol with 340bhp before the end of the year. I may well look at the 335 when it's released.

My 330d scares standard classics and newer bug-eyes and WRX's anyway, so the increased bhp and torque of the twin turbo will be great. Not sure about the pay off with mpg though. Mine's averaging over 40mpg and has done since new.

Matt

PS - Forgot to caveat this by saying that of course, any Impreza is faster than a diesel, especially in the twisties (unless it's twisties called the Nurburgring of course! )
Old 13 January 2005, 05:15 PM
  #17  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And remember, the 535d comes with the new six speed auto as standard.....
Old 13 January 2005, 05:23 PM
  #18  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's just that diesel engines appear to be about 200kgs heavier than petrol ones. Provided they can keep all that weight under control, fair play.
Old 13 January 2005, 05:37 PM
  #19  
slim_boy_fat
Scooby Regular
 
slim_boy_fat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
It's just that diesel engines appear to be about 200kgs heavier than petrol ones. Provided they can keep all that weight under control, fair play.
I dont think the 3.0diesel is 200kgs heavier than 3.0l petrol engine. 100kgs maybe .
Old 13 January 2005, 05:47 PM
  #20  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Decent guessing guys....

525i Touring 1655kg
545i Touring 1795kg
525d Touring 1750kg
530d Touring 1760kg
535d Touring 1830kg
Old 13 January 2005, 06:04 PM
  #21  
Tommy_Lee
Scooby Regular
 
Tommy_Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Harry_Boy
Decent guessing guys....

525i Touring 1655kg
545i Touring 1795kg
525d Touring 1750kg
530d Touring 1760kg
535d Touring 1830kg
Yeah they are quite heavy,but they have very low power loss to the wheels and the aero will make up for alot of that weight over 100mph.Thats why they always seem so fast on the m'way.

The 335d isnt confirmed yet but it wil probably happen,same for the 330ti.
Old 13 January 2005, 10:40 PM
  #22  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Wow, that's a lot smaller weight difference than I remembered. Impressive.
Old 14 January 2005, 12:32 AM
  #23  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Wow, that's a lot smaller weight difference than I remembered. Impressive.
True Brendan - and the 535d's figure is including the auto box, which adds a little extra to the other versions.

In fact, I'm so impressed, I think I might have to get one....
Old 14 January 2005, 12:46 AM
  #24  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Step Father, who's a very senior officer in a certain police force is due to receive a 535d shortly.

Can't wait to have a blast in it. His current 530d is ok, but nothing special until you remember it's an oil burner. We've sat many a time on motorways and left tailgaitors in **** gtis behind.

The 530d does guzzle, though. His has averaged only 33mpg over 2 years and he drives like a fanny.
Old 14 January 2005, 08:50 AM
  #25  
what would scooby do
Scooby Senior
 
what would scooby do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 52 Festive Road
Posts: 28,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought it was well known that all the next generation of fast cars would be sequential turbo'd diesels all the manufacturers agree that petrol was not the way forward for performance cars ?
Old 14 January 2005, 09:33 AM
  #26  
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
brickboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Halfway down page 2 and no-one's mentioned "the twisties" yet? What's up with SN?

Another interesting thing I saw was AutoExpress tested the Ibiza PD160 recently. Its standing-start figures were as fast as the Honda CTR that the magazine tested to 70mph, and within 1.5 seconds to 100mph .... and the Ibiza monsters the CTR in the gears.

The gap is definitely narrowing.
Old 14 January 2005, 10:22 AM
  #27  
Duck_Pond
Scooby Regular
 
Duck_Pond's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Twitching with a camera
Posts: 22,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Brickboy's comments are more appropriate, because it shows what the cheaper end of the diesel market is like.

The 535d costs nearly £40k - how would a £40k Scoob (if there even is one) compare in performance? The 330d currently costs at least £27k (unless you're a cheapskate and import it from Germany ) which puts it in the same bracket as the top end STi models.

I wonder when marques such as Ferrari and Porsche will look at diesel engines for their models? At the moment, the idea is scoffed at, because when people pay for performance, they're not likely to be concerned about economy...
Old 14 January 2005, 04:51 PM
  #28  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 40k 535d and a 40k impreza may be be in a different league in performance terms but then they are in a different league in reliability, built quality, quality of materials, comforts and toys, etc. Your 40k isn't buying you just the twin turbo engine!
Old 15 January 2005, 06:02 PM
  #29  
Hol
Scooby Senior
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Hol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kent in a 396bhp Scoob/Now SOLD!
Posts: 4,122
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Ill take two! One for the wife and one for the girlfriend.

What colours do they do?
Old 15 January 2005, 06:03 PM
  #30  
Hol
Scooby Senior
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Hol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kent in a 396bhp Scoob/Now SOLD!
Posts: 4,122
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hol
and one for the girlfriend.









I wish I could afford two,







women that is!


Quick Reply: So oil burners can out-accelerate scoobys!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM.