Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Volvo V70

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 February 2005, 01:43 PM
  #1  
Bexlee
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Bexlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Volvo V70

Well everyone needs a load lugger! I actually enjoy the leather armchair driving experience as a contrast to the Scoob, but I would also expect a contrast in fuel economy!

I have the 2.4 SE & it returns less than 25mpg for everyday mixture of M'way, A / B road steady driving & struggles to make 30mpg on very long steady motorway driving. Even the Scoob managed 32mpg on a long motorway haul.

I have spoken to one other owner & a dealer who both felt the mpg was a bit low (reckoned on 28mpg for mix of roads & 38mpg for steady motorway).

Any other V70 owners (who dare to admit it, anyway ) on SN who could give some real world comparisons?
Old 14 February 2005, 01:47 PM
  #2  
IbizaFR
Scooby Regular
 
IbizaFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no way will it be that high for motorway
Old 14 February 2005, 01:56 PM
  #3  
Bexlee
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Bexlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IbizaFR
no way will it be that high for motorway
The Scoob or the Volvo?

Impreza definitely did 32.01mpg; 328.1 miles from 46.60 litres- my record! (Now you can believe I am a Volvo driver at heart! At least on that particular day I was)
Old 14 February 2005, 02:35 PM
  #4  
Andy M3
Scooby Regular
 
Andy M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Volvo's are not very good on fuel. You seem to be getting good econamy
Old 14 February 2005, 03:56 PM
  #5  
Cupramax
Scooby Regular
 
Cupramax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've run a company V70 D5 on several long distance business trips and got about 40mpg out of it according to the trip computer. Cant see a petrol one getting anywhere near that TBH.
Old 14 February 2005, 04:09 PM
  #6  
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
brickboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A mate has a 2.5T (the light-pressure turbo) and gets about 31mpg on a m-way run at a steady 80-85.

My best-ever economy in my old V40 T4 was 34mpg on a long m-way run at a steady & carefuly 75-80. Oddly, it used to give 31-32mpg on the m-way if I caned it at a 90+ cruise. So I quickly gave up on economy driving
Old 14 February 2005, 05:55 PM
  #7  
Bexlee
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Bexlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies.

It still sounds like it is down 3 or 4 mpg then.
Old 14 February 2005, 05:59 PM
  #8  
captain ted
Scooby Regular
 
captain ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scunthorpe
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bexlee
The Scoob or the Volvo?

Impreza definitely did 32.01mpg; 328.1 miles from 46.60 litres- my record! (Now you can believe I am a Volvo driver at heart! At least on that particular day I was)
32.01 MPG?

Thats what you get from driving like a scared schoolgirl!
Old 14 February 2005, 07:12 PM
  #9  
Vegas 531
Scooby Regular
 
Vegas 531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not quite a V70 but I have a S60 T5 and can even get 30mpg.

My run to work is a mixture of dual carriage way and main A-Roads and I get an average of 30mpg over a week.

On the motorway, I'll get a steady 34mpg. Not bad for 250bhp.
Old 14 February 2005, 09:33 PM
  #10  
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
 
chris's scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We drove a D5 V70 on Saturday and the trip computer was in the high 20's.
Old 14 February 2005, 11:17 PM
  #11  
IbizaFR
Scooby Regular
 
IbizaFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Volvo. I have a 2.4 S80 and driving reasonably you will get around 26-30 per tank not much more. It is heavy.
Old 16 February 2005, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Pigshed
Scooby Newbie
 
Pigshed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Recently sold my 850 T5 (auto) to a friend. Used to average 33 on motorways over it's 210,000 miles. Mate was getting 25/26 for the first few weeks but he's now upto about 29, maybe it takes a while to get used to driving a bus. Switched to a 3.0 Outback for about two months which never gave over 28 and never really performed so now have a WRX PPP which gives 30 until I get bored and start using it to apply a grin.

Last edited by Pigshed; 16 February 2005 at 04:33 PM.
Old 17 February 2005, 11:45 PM
  #13  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Run a XC70 D5 & get around 37mpg generally with a heavy foot & 40+ with a "legal" foot...

I've seen 375 miles out of PTMW! which equates to about 33.5mpg


The main reason that a scoob might be better on fuel than a volvo is that the volvo weighs a load more - generally due to the quality of build & materials used!!
Old 18 February 2005, 04:33 PM
  #14  
Bexlee
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Bexlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the Volvo in the local dealers today to investigate- though they were doubtful there would be a problem as like they say, the driver gets messages from the car if there is even a little defect eg lamp bulbs. Apparantly they ran a diagnostic & then quoted me the Govt mpg figures!

A possible explanation is that the V70 has an adaptive gearbox (auto) that learns the style of driving. So perhaps if it is setting itself up for a mixture of road types as per its usual journey, this may well be why it doesn't show better than 29mpg on a long steady run.

However, they did give it a well needed wash- even dressed the tyres- and sorted out a recall on the fan that has just been issued (& mine is a 51!). And no charge.

Big, heavy, thirsty, excellent car.
Old 27 February 2005, 10:24 PM
  #15  
davecweed
Scooby Regular
 
davecweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my s60 t5 gets 25 - 29mpg, depended on how you drive, average figs
Old 28 February 2005, 10:21 AM
  #16  
rallyfan1977
Scooby Regular
 
rallyfan1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dubai / Melksham
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran a V70 D5 SE estate as a company bus for a few months and rarely saw 30mpg - mainly A and B road driving and forgetting that I wasn't in the Scoob.
I even did a road rally and an autotest in it!!!
Old 28 February 2005, 10:33 AM
  #17  
s70rjw
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (2)
 
s70rjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My T5 manual averaged 20 around town and best was 27 on a 300 miledrive at a steady 70.
Old 28 February 2005, 02:07 PM
  #18  
dtriggs
Scooby Regular
 
dtriggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got a V70 2.5 LPT - it does 31-32 mpg on a long run and about 25 for town stuff. The older 2.4 T we just traded in was alot heavier on the fuel though - more like 27 and 22.

I would have thought you should get better than your figures for a non turbo model,
Old 28 February 2005, 08:25 PM
  #19  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I used to get an average of 24 mpg in my T5 estate (850)
Old 28 February 2005, 09:35 PM
  #20  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've heard (I'd like to say "from a reliable source," but I can't vouch for that) that a turbocharged engine running off boost will be more economical than the identical engine in it's NA guise. Apparently this is because a turbo'd engine has a lower compression ratio. To be honest I haven't verified this but it certainly made sense in my MR2's. the 2 litre 16v Turbo, ran more economically off boost than the 2 litre 16v non turbo doing an identical 450 mile round trip.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Charlie H
ScoobyNet General
28
01 October 2002 03:17 PM
McMiata Man
Other Marques
4
20 January 2002 09:16 PM
blue nose
ScoobyNet General
9
17 December 2001 09:31 PM
AWD
ScoobyNet General
42
19 April 2001 10:40 AM
SteveB
ScoobyNet General
2
25 January 2001 08:18 AM



Quick Reply: Volvo V70



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.