New S3 (Test Drive)
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: RENNtech Fettled A45
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New S3 (Test Drive)
Just got back from a day with the New S3 (although I do have it till the morning, which is nice )
If i'm honest I don't want to give it back.. What a lovely motor..
First of all on the looks side of it, the only thing that lets it down for me is the wheels.. Nice design but look a little small IMO (see pics) and the rear end could do with a few subtle changes to seperate it more from the normal 2.0T. Apart from that, I think it's looks the business.. See for yourself and give opinions..
Performance wise it's impressive.. I would put it somewhere between a standard LCR and a remapped one.. Definatly quicker than mine when in standard form, but would struggle to hang on to a remapped one I think..
It has a different power delivery to mine, less aggresive and more progressive, which is nice to see on a turbo charged motor. Revs round nicely to 7,000rpm and feels like it can go more if it wasn't for the rev limiter having it's say. But the good thing is, you can drive it ***** out or just as easily potter about town in it feeling more relaxed than ever. It's a very good comprimise i'd say. Especially on the motorway, as you can again be Mr outside lane man trying to break the sound barrier, or be driving Miss Daisy trundling along at 50-60 on the inside lane.. What ever suits really..
Handling wise... Again another thumbs up! Although I haven't exactly taken it on a rally stage.. lol. It seems to handle very well and not wollow as much as mine (LCR) and has awesome grip out of the bends (helped by 4WD obviously). But as I said, with me having all my work folders everywhere, I didn't throw it about to much, otherwise it would end up looking like an explosion in WH Smith's inside..
Fuel wise I didn't find it that bad.. I started with half a tank and have done about 150miles of reasonably aggressive driving and the fuel light has only just come on. Averaging about 25-26 last time I looked. So probably about the same as mine really...
If anyone wants to ask any other questions on it, feel free... But it's a big thumbs up from me so far!! :thumright: :thumright:
:thumright:
Some pics I took earlier ..
Anyone else had the pleasure and what were there thoughts?
If i'm honest I don't want to give it back.. What a lovely motor..
First of all on the looks side of it, the only thing that lets it down for me is the wheels.. Nice design but look a little small IMO (see pics) and the rear end could do with a few subtle changes to seperate it more from the normal 2.0T. Apart from that, I think it's looks the business.. See for yourself and give opinions..
Performance wise it's impressive.. I would put it somewhere between a standard LCR and a remapped one.. Definatly quicker than mine when in standard form, but would struggle to hang on to a remapped one I think..
It has a different power delivery to mine, less aggresive and more progressive, which is nice to see on a turbo charged motor. Revs round nicely to 7,000rpm and feels like it can go more if it wasn't for the rev limiter having it's say. But the good thing is, you can drive it ***** out or just as easily potter about town in it feeling more relaxed than ever. It's a very good comprimise i'd say. Especially on the motorway, as you can again be Mr outside lane man trying to break the sound barrier, or be driving Miss Daisy trundling along at 50-60 on the inside lane.. What ever suits really..
Handling wise... Again another thumbs up! Although I haven't exactly taken it on a rally stage.. lol. It seems to handle very well and not wollow as much as mine (LCR) and has awesome grip out of the bends (helped by 4WD obviously). But as I said, with me having all my work folders everywhere, I didn't throw it about to much, otherwise it would end up looking like an explosion in WH Smith's inside..
Fuel wise I didn't find it that bad.. I started with half a tank and have done about 150miles of reasonably aggressive driving and the fuel light has only just come on. Averaging about 25-26 last time I looked. So probably about the same as mine really...
If anyone wants to ask any other questions on it, feel free... But it's a big thumbs up from me so far!! :thumright: :thumright:
:thumright:
Some pics I took earlier ..
Anyone else had the pleasure and what were there thoughts?
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lovely car, awful colour.
and horrendous alloys considering its the top of the range sporting model. They look like a spare set of winter of wheels someone had put on.
Also a big shame theres no flared arches this time, that rear quarter is crying out for a bit of a buldge
and horrendous alloys considering its the top of the range sporting model. They look like a spare set of winter of wheels someone had put on.
Also a big shame theres no flared arches this time, that rear quarter is crying out for a bit of a buldge
#5
Audi makes overpriced quality cars. They are beautifully built, no doubt a joy to own, but you admire them rather than lust after them. I have seen this car in this colour and it is even brighter than the Ford orange, but, like the Focus ST, no one except the most hardened petrolhead will know you are driving something special unless it is orange. Most S3s will be ordered in black or some inoffensive light metallic and so will be totally unrecognisable from the lesser models. And those alloys look like wheel trims - why have they not fitted RS4-like wheels? Does anyone really think that this looks like a £30k car?
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice interior as usual but that exterior looks pretty tragic to me.
The old S3 had about three times the presence!
Assume you can spec nicer alloys? They look like something you'd see on a low rent Proton.
The old S3 had about three times the presence!
Assume you can spec nicer alloys? They look like something you'd see on a low rent Proton.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent interior as usual but a serious let down externally.
Audi have totally lost the unobtrusive but agressive look of the old S3, and have turned out a standard A3 with crap 'added on look' front bumper, with some shiny mirrors (that most A3 seem to have these days anyway) with the worse set of audi wheels ive seen in a long time on a sporting model.
#9
The wheels look better in the flesh.
Mine is being built this week, should be here by the end of the month
I actually like the fact that it is fairly anonymous, been through the Impreza/Evo thing and want something that blended in a little more. Performance wise, it is one quick car , was certainly difficult to tell much between my Sti PPP and the S3. I absolutely loved it, really put a smile on my face, plenty of oversteer, easy to induce, absolute hoot to drive.
The flat bottomed steering wheel (option) is a must too, the standard one looks crap. Would agree about the colour choice though, I considered white but eventually went for Sprint Blue.
The shiny mirrors are standard on all S models, the S4 etc included.
Mine is being built this week, should be here by the end of the month
I actually like the fact that it is fairly anonymous, been through the Impreza/Evo thing and want something that blended in a little more. Performance wise, it is one quick car , was certainly difficult to tell much between my Sti PPP and the S3. I absolutely loved it, really put a smile on my face, plenty of oversteer, easy to induce, absolute hoot to drive.
The flat bottomed steering wheel (option) is a must too, the standard one looks crap. Would agree about the colour choice though, I considered white but eventually went for Sprint Blue.
The shiny mirrors are standard on all S models, the S4 etc included.
Last edited by MattW; 09 January 2007 at 08:37 PM. Reason: Add photo
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't need to try it to be proved right and you know it
Beside, it would do me fine...a nice refined car for my 100 mile a day commute along the m1.
Beside, it would do me fine...a nice refined car for my 100 mile a day commute along the m1.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may be yes.
As a company type car it would be perfect I'd imagine, it certainly ticks all the right boxes...does it come in a 5 door?
However, for something for kicks and grins I'd suggest looking else where. It all depends what you want from a car I suppose.
As a company type car it would be perfect I'd imagine, it certainly ticks all the right boxes...does it come in a 5 door?
However, for something for kicks and grins I'd suggest looking else where. It all depends what you want from a car I suppose.
#19
Naturally. It's all a balance though, no car ticks all the boxes, depends on which boxes you'd prefer to have the big bold ticks. This time I wanted the nice place to be, reasonably economical, decent residuals and decent fun factor, but I have been to the white knuckle ride, **** your pants, corners like on rails columns before, just a shame that comes with downsides.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes it was a very expensive extra but it had to be done
Recaro bucket seats
6 cd boose stereo system
I pod connector
arm rest
sunroof
adaptive lights (i think)
Black leather
Am sure there was more
Cant really remember the rest
In total it's costing £32k
#23
I went with:
Ipod
Bose
Light/Rain sensor
Flat bottomed multi function steering wheel
Armrest
Bluetooth phone prep in armrest
Through load
Piano black inlays
No smoking pack
Electric Lumbar
Metallic paint (of course)
Black leather is standard. As are Bi-Xenons, however I think the adaptive bit was an option.
#25
lol look who edited their reply
MK2 S3 has no official 'ring time yet, but its only a sec slower than the E46 M3 even though it does have less power, quite a bit less power at that. (never mind a remap can fix that)
Cant find the source where the S3 beats the M3, but when I do you will know about it
In other news the RS4 laps the 'ring faster than the M5, and the R8 slaps all beemers silly
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You must have had the symphony stereo as well ( to have 6 cd and ipod)
I went with:
Ipod
Bose
Light/Rain sensor
Flat bottomed multi function steering wheel
Armrest
Bluetooth phone prep in armrest
Through load
Piano black inlays
No smoking pack
Electric Lumbar
Metallic paint (of course)
Black leather is standard. As are Bi-Xenons, however I think the adaptive bit was an option.
I went with:
Ipod
Bose
Light/Rain sensor
Flat bottomed multi function steering wheel
Armrest
Bluetooth phone prep in armrest
Through load
Piano black inlays
No smoking pack
Electric Lumbar
Metallic paint (of course)
Black leather is standard. As are Bi-Xenons, however I think the adaptive bit was an option.
I got the sports wheel to and it's also de-chromed.
All black
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol look who edited their reply
MK2 S3 has no official 'ring time yet, but its only a sec slower than the E46 M3 even though it does have less power, quite a bit less power at that. (never mind a remap can fix that)
Cant find the source where the S3 beats the M3, but when I do you will know about it
In other news the RS4 laps the 'ring faster than the M5, and the R8 slaps all beemers silly
MK2 S3 has no official 'ring time yet, but its only a sec slower than the E46 M3 even though it does have less power, quite a bit less power at that. (never mind a remap can fix that)
Cant find the source where the S3 beats the M3, but when I do you will know about it
In other news the RS4 laps the 'ring faster than the M5, and the R8 slaps all beemers silly
Funny you can't find the source huh? Not like you to be unable to back up your "facts".
What is the the R8 lap time? Must be quicker than 7.50?
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The S3 undeersteered a certain track faster than a E46 M3
but its only a sec slower than the E46 M3
#30
I only edited it to include more info, not to try and make you look more stupid....you do a good enough job of that. Interesting you would say in one post it's quicker and another it's 1 sec slower. Still things move on and I expect the tyres and track has improved since 2000....in fact I know it has.
Funny you can't find the source huh? Not like you to be unable to back up your "facts".
What is the the R8 lap time? Must be quicker than 7.50?
Funny you can't find the source huh? Not like you to be unable to back up your "facts".
What is the the R8 lap time? Must be quicker than 7.50?
and no the track and tyres hasnt improved you fookin moron, as they tested the M3 again only recently to keep comparisons fair.