ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   ScoobyNet General (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/)
-   -   Are knackered Subarus faster? (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/1033441-are-knackered-subarus-faster.html)

BrownPantsRacing 05 January 2016 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by banny sti (Post 11778678)
Raised compression :lol1:

Cool. I might consider this upgrade then! :lol:

The Pink Ninja 05 January 2016 01:53 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11778273)
I was told in 2008 it had 6 months life left. Basically a few mechanics have told me over 4000rpm dynamic compression means the cylinders technically seal themselves and power is restored but you still get the added benefits of burning oil that seeped into the cylinders, almost like a poor man's antilag.

Thought you'd already blown it up and replaced it a few years back...on your previous profile...How many WRX engines have you been through :lol1:

Blue by You 05 January 2016 02:14 PM

I can't see most of this as I have chosen not to partake in aRSe_Matt's loonacy any more, but at a guess I would say he's got a new pack of funny fags for Crimbo.

You know what they say, you don't know when you're dead, it's just difficult for the others.
It's the same when you're aRSe_Matt.

legacy_gtb 05 January 2016 02:41 PM

Chosen not to partake?

How? is there an ignore button somewhere or such like?

BrownPantsRacing 05 January 2016 02:50 PM

Once upon a time....

To be fair to aRSe_Matt though, if he wasn't posting daft threads like this then we'd only have another raft of threads entitled "It's so quiet in here" or "Where has everyone gone" or "The good old days" blah blah blah.

Besides, discussions with Matt are like reasoning with my 2 year old son. :)

No offense Matt.

The End.

scoobyboy1 05 January 2016 03:47 PM

I was hoping Matt would open his own garage building and tuning Subaru's,:lol1:

Think Matt would do really well, as to a newbie who has just bought a WRX, Matt would sound like a god to them with his stories of beating supercars, 0-60 times under 3 seconds, and myth busting tuning facts that he can usually back up with videos from You Tube of WRX's doing the quarter mile in the USA!!!:sleep:

Blue by You 05 January 2016 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 11778734)
Chosen not to partake?

How? is there an ignore button somewhere or such like?

Yep, go to your User CP, select the last item in the third category down from the menu on the left (Edit Ignore List), add the desired name to the list, voila! :thumb:

Blue by You 05 January 2016 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing (Post 11778740)
Besides, discussions with Matt are like reasoning with my 2 year old son. :)

I think any self respecting 2 year old would take offense at that comparison :lol1:

legacy_gtb 05 January 2016 04:19 PM


Originally Posted by Blue by You (Post 11778771)
Yep, go to your User CP, select the last item in the third category down from the menu on the left (Edit Ignore List), add the desired name to the list, voila! :thumb:

Ta :thumb:

BrownPantsRacing 05 January 2016 04:22 PM


Originally Posted by Blue by You (Post 11778774)
I think any self respecting 2 year old would take offense at that comparison :lol1:

True! :D

RS_Matt 05 January 2016 07:42 PM


Originally Posted by The Pink Ninja (Post 11778713)
Thought you'd already blown it up and replaced it a few years back...on your previous profile...How many WRX engines have you been through :lol1:

Original engine still. And this is my original profile. RE Motorsport compression tested it and told me the cylinder walls were shot after using a bore scope. So basically my shagged 300lbft WRX would waste any production STI and it's compression is so low across all 4 cylinders that I might aswell be running on 3 healthy ones! 1500cc STI destroyer.

:norty:

nortonscooby 05 January 2016 07:46 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11778871)
Original engine still. And this is my original profile. RE Motorsport compression tested it and told me the cylinder walls were shot after using a bore scope. So basically my shagged 300lbft WRX would waste any production STI and it's compression is so low across all 4 cylinders that I might aswell be running on 3 healthy ones! 1500cc STI destroyer.

:norty:

Have you phoned dvla to enquire if you can have cheaper tax bracket?

BLU 05 January 2016 07:53 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11778273)
I was told in 2008 it had 6 months life left. Basically a few mechanics have told me over 4000rpm dynamic compression means the cylinders technically seal themselves and power is restored but you still get the added benefits of burning oil that seeped into the cylinders, almost like a poor man's antilag.

Is that the same mechanics that sold you a left handed screwdriver, a glass hammer and some tartan paint?? :lol1::lol1:

I jest :D - In answer to your original question, I doubt it! If that was the case race teams wouldn't bother building race engines as often as they do :)

RS_Matt 05 January 2016 07:57 PM


Originally Posted by nortonscooby (Post 11778875)
Have you phoned dvla to enquire if you can have cheaper tax bracket?

Ironic thing is the diagnosis was 8 years ago, I've abused it since and run unmapped mods. Crikey I'm thinking 1200cc these days.

What a car

#WRX

mickywrx 05 January 2016 08:46 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11778871)
300lbft WRX

Should have pissed all over my 1/4 mile time that you're chasing with more BHP and LB/ft than my car, especially after your extensive weight reduction program, by now. :lol1:

RS_Matt 05 January 2016 09:37 PM


Originally Posted by mickywrx (Post 11778908)
Should have pissed all over my 1/4 mile time that you're chasing with more BHP and LB/ft than my car, especially after your extensive weight reduction program, by now. :lol1:

Wet v super sunny day my friend!

I didn't run last year because PD130!!!

...But this year 11 secs with just 300lbft in a knacked Newage is on!

scoobyboy1 05 January 2016 10:18 PM


Originally Posted by mickywrx (Post 11778908)
Should have pissed all over my 1/4 mile time that you're chasing with more BHP and LB/ft than my car, especially after your extensive weight reduction program, by now. :lol1:

All these chasing numbers and extensive weight saving by Matt and he gets beaten by a older classic with less power:lol1:

Did you have your winter Venoms on too Micky???;)

JGlanzaV 06 January 2016 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by scoobyboy1 (Post 11778950)
All these chasing numbers and extensive weight saving by Matt and he gets beaten by a older classic with less power:lol1:

Did you have your winter Venoms on too Micky???;)

Could probably go faster than mates knackered engine on a skateboard.... he won't put his money where his mouth is when we called him out to show us how fast it is at ten of the best.....

BrownPantsRacing 06 January 2016 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11778938)
...But this year 11 secs with just 300lbft in a knacked Newage is on!

No, no it most definitely isn't!

#dreamer

RS_Matt 06 January 2016 11:58 AM

e
 

Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing (Post 11779026)
No, no it most definitely isn't!

#dreamer

I remember similar comments when I suggested I could hit 12`s in my knacked WRX with budget tyres, that can manage 40mpg on a long run.

Even more impressive is that I did 12`s on a cold damp track with muddy tyres. Something a Spec C struggles to manage in the heat of Japan with a racing driver.

#WRXdenial

BrownPantsRacing 06 January 2016 12:11 PM


Originally Posted by aRSe_Matt (Post 11779074)
I remember similar comments when I suggested I could hit 12`s in my knacked WRX with budget tyres, that can manage 40mpg on a long run.

Even more impressive is that I did it on a cold damp track with muddy tyres.

#WRXdenial

Give it up Matt. Christ!

I can do 12's in my WRX too, that's no big achievement. But hitting 11's in a car with only 300lb/ft in a standard weight WRX with a f****d engine is NEVER going to happen! You are very deluded or just plain thick. Can't decide which.

Were you on a cold damp track with muddy tyres? That's the first we have heard of this!!! :lol1:

Probably the only reason your WRX gearbox isn't toast.

RS_Matt 06 January 2016 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing (Post 11779081)
Give it up Matt. Christ!

I can do 12's in my WRX too, that's no big achievement. But hitting 11's in a car with only 300lb/ft in a standard weight WRX with a f****d engine is NEVER going to happen! You are very deluded or just plain thick. Can't decide which.

Were you on a cold damp track with muddy tyres? That's the first we have heard of this!!! :lol1:

Probably the only reason your WRX gearbox isn't toast.

It's strange you've seen me harp on about the tyre predicament but not my weight saving escapades.

Your reaction will be interesting after I've run 11's. You'll go quiet like everyone did after I unbelievably ran 12's. Then we'll be onto the unthinkable, 10.9 with under 350lbft!!!!!!! and the WRX hating/denial cycle will continue.

banny sti 06 January 2016 01:02 PM

I hope we cross paths on the mad mile soon....

RS_Matt 06 January 2016 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by banny sti (Post 11779098)
I hope we cross paths on the mad mile soon....

Had an horrible crash on there once :(

What power you running these days?

banny sti 06 January 2016 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11779100)
Had an horrible crash on there once :(

What power you running these days?

Enough ;)

BrownPantsRacing 06 January 2016 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11779097)
It's strange you've seen me harp on about the tyre predicament but not my weight saving escapades.

Your reaction will be interesting after I've run 11's. You'll go quiet like everyone did after I unbelievably ran 12's. Then we'll be onto the unthinkable, 10.9 with under 350lbft!!!!!!! and the WRX hating/denial cycle will continue.

There is something wrong with you. I've always given you the benefit of the doubt and even said positive things about you in the past, but quite honestly I give up. Same old broken record over and over again with nothing but your wild imagination to back up your ridiculous claims.

I tell you what Matt, If you actually achieve 11s with only 300lb/ft in your current car with it's broken engine then I will not only shut up, I will delete my account! Full stop.

BUT... until you do that I suggets you stop posting, because with every single post you make yourself look more of an idiot.

legacy_gtb 06 January 2016 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by Blue by You (Post 11778771)
Yep, go to your User CP, select the last item in the third category down from the menu on the left (Edit Ignore List), add the desired name to the list, voila! :thumb:

Sorry Blue, but that hasn't worked! Im still seeing his inane drivel despite there definitely showing a ticked box clearly in my ignore list.

BrownPants, theres no pont arguing with an idiot, they just bring you down to theyre level and beat you with experience.

cookstar 06 January 2016 02:08 PM

10.9 with 350 torques 😂

JGlanzaV 06 January 2016 02:32 PM


Originally Posted by banny sti (Post 11779098)
I hope we cross paths on the mad mile soon....

Not likely....!

I would even pay for matts TOTB entry if he was going to put his money where hismouth is, but I think. Trolling is more fun when you don't have any proof!

legacy_gtb 06 January 2016 02:44 PM

Met a guy in a bar once, him and his really hairy girlfriend were boasting something about his car doing the kessel run in less than 12 parsecs ......

Matt did it in 11!

The hairy girlfriend wouldnt stop moaning about it either!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands