Originally Posted by ali_j
i would like to add to that and say not all punjabis are sikh also.
edited to say, Its not an advertised fact that Up to or more than half of Punjab lies within modern day Pakistan. Thus, it would be foolish to assume all Punjabis are Sikh, or have any religion to that point. |
Originally Posted by Regulator
Do you not think it is reasonable for Holy Temples to be exempt from such gratuitous scenes in a play?
I'm no arty farty type but I thought the idea of art, be it sculptures, paintings or plays is to challenge boundaries whilst letting judgement be by the people who view them. Some might be offended, some may think it is genius but none should be denied from the freedom to make that choice. |
Thats going into an entirely different argument as far as art is concerned.
But do you not think it is a reasonable request for the place of worship be removed from the play with the current circumstances? |
Originally Posted by billsandhu
By the very fact that you moaned, you protested, whether alone or collectively its still a protest. Do we assume that now you are enforcing your views upon the rest of us, not allowing us to form our own opinion? Maybe you didnt take to the streets but you certainly had your say.
|
I am not objecting to the protests.It just seems excessive censorship when people who have no intention of going to this play can dictate whats in it.
|
I think you ould agree that protesting is a way of projecting ones views, and thus not enforcing it. No one is holding a gun to the producers heads' to force them to change the script to the best of my knowledge.
|
But do you not think it is a reasonable request for the place of worship be removed from the play with the current circumstances? |
Originally Posted by Regulator
do you not think it is a reasonable request for the place of worship be removed from the play with the current circumstances?
|
dba, i think you would find that censorship would involve Government deciding the Play was unreasonable. I also cannot work out how projecting ones views is linked to Dication of views?
|
Originally Posted by Regulator
I think you ould agree that protesting is a way of projecting ones views, and thus not enforcing it. No one is holding a gun to the producers heads' to force them to change the script to the best of my knowledge.
and no one is holding a gun to anyones head and forcing them to go and watch this play |
Originally Posted by Regulator
I think you ould agree that protesting is a way of projecting ones views, and thus not enforcing it. No one is holding a gun to the producers heads' to force them to change the script to the best of my knowledge.
|
Originally Posted by dba
It just seems excessive censorship when people who have no intention of going to this play can dictate whats in it.
|
Do you think its reasonable for me to ask you to leave the thread? comments like that are irrelevant, but can be thrown around all day.
As a follower of the religion i find the scenes offensive and have the right to project my views in any legal way i wish. Ajm, thanks for the understanding. I can sympathise with your argument, but find myself siding with the protestors on this one. |
Originally Posted by Regulator
dba, i think you would find that censorship would involve Government deciding the Play was unreasonable. I also cannot work out how projecting ones views is linked to Dication of views?
|
Originally Posted by Regulator
Do you think its reasonable for me to ask you to leave the thread? comments like that are irrelevant, but can be thrown around all day.
As a follower of the religion i find the scenes offensive and have the right to project my views in any legal way i wish. Ajm, thanks for the understanding. I can sympathise with your argument, but find myself siding with the protestors on this one. where have I argued with that? you keep repeating yourself for no reason at all.I repeat,I have no arguement against the protest,none at all.I have an objection against artistic censorship by people who have no intention of going to see this play. |
I think your understanding of Dicatorship lacks some. If there was a Sikh government in power, and they then commanded that the play be stopped, it would be a dictatorship of views. But as it is, its a protest.
|
Originally Posted by Regulator
I think your understanding of Dicatorship lacks some. If there was a Sikh government in power, and they then commanded that the play be stopped, it would be a dictatorship of views. But as it is, its a protest.
|
I think its quite obvious to see that we are not going to agree on this subject, and i gracefully bow out of the discussion.
Interperet this as want, chickening out, admitting defeat, or as it is, simply acknowledging that there is not going to be agreement on the issue in a large community. |
It's only a temple, I doubt anyone here would give a damn if it was set in a church. Some people get waaaaay to het up about a religion.
|
I'm with BillSandhu and Regulator on this one, in it's current form it is a protest but I won't apologise for saying that I consider this an insult, similar to blasphemy as said by moses (not THE moses :) ) . I demand the scenes be changed and don't make no bones about it :) Whether somebody'll listen to me is another matter but I'm entitled to voice my opinion, particularly when iti nvolves something I feel strongly about.
Jai |
There are plenty of examples of murder, rape and other crimes carried out in Western churches as part of dramatic scenes in films and plays. What we need to know is what the context is. Usually, showing such a crime in a setting such as a church or other place of worship serves to accentuate the enormity of the crime being committed, not to belittle the religion or show its adherents in a bad light. Just because certain elements of society resort to violent protest to secure what they want, namely the bowdlerisation of legitimate drama in a free country, is no reason to cave in just to keep the peace.
|
Originally Posted by Regulator
I think its quite obvious to see that we are not going to agree on this subject, and i gracefully bow out of the discussion.
Interperet this as want, chickening out, admitting defeat, or as it is, simply acknowledging that there is not going to be agreement on the issue in a large community. |
We will never all agree, its life and thats what makes it interesting. This play quite clearly causes great offence to the sikh nation. Disagreeing/debating is all good and healthy, but blatant offence is really not acceptable. If the REP wish to continue running the play, then IMO they are sending out a clear message to the sikhs of "we dont give a damn".
|
Yeh, i thought the discussion had reached its end, and could possibly get childish. If it was on the other side of the fence, I could see myself arguing for freedom of artistic ideas and such, so no biggie :)
|
If you read the artical, they dont demand the play is canceled, just the scenes inside the temple do I as a christian demand the removal of scenes from films / plays ?? NO I see it as a freedom of speech and expression , and these other religions "That take offense" should see it in the same light hearted manner for example: The scenes that are filmed within the christian church in "End Of Days" which sees the devil rise up in the christian church... c'mon see it as its meant to be seen, not real, its a film / play / make believe religion it seems ( especially from the middle east & India) is something that should not be frowned upon or laughed at, but how many films/ plays have they watched that are set in a church and thought nothing of it be more open minded I say, and take things as they are nothing will come from it, give it a few weeks and no one will even remember it if you totally believe in your faith , then you'll know that any thing thats against it will not prevail sit back, chill out & laugh at it in the thought that you are right violence & protest only stir up violence & protest Phil ( been on the stella, as if yo couldn't tell) Happy Xmas all |
Is the Play stating that the offending behaviour occurs in all Sikh Temples? Or is it just a representation of an incident(s) in one Sikh Temple, that is part of the story line of the Play in question?
|
**Puts up hand and says I'm a sikh!**
What kind of title is that for a thread? :rolleyes: -Schumacher |
Question: do the REP have the right to change the location of the offending scenes?
Maybe they can request the director and/or playright to make a change, but can they enforce such a change? As a last resort they could say change it or we'll close the play I suppose. Also I read that there had been a long dialogue between the REP and the Sikh community before the play started. All audiance members are given a letter on entering the theatre to say that the Sikh community find the play offensive and go on to describe why. Rather than try and stop the play wouldn't it have been far more effective to just protest peacefully and not give the playright the oxygen of publicity? |
Freedom of Speech...LOL
Just like the recent saga in madame tussards with Beckham, Victoria, Trevor Macdonald and Bush playing the NATIVITY..... Should we turn a blind eye to this as well.... Come on...Have some respect. BTW: I didnt see the Sikh program so cant and wont comment on that. |
thanks god i am an athiest. ;)
censorship of any kind for an adult is bad, m'kay. http://www.wapers.com/animesncartoon...thpark1800.jpg |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands