Originally Posted by bonesetter
(Post 11609347)
There must be cameras pointing all over the place
Thing is, and not wanting to make this personal, you are completely closed to the possibility of something being not quite as the official story goes. Don't you think governments have propaganda to think about to control their people? Every g'ment has a Ministry of Propaganda - haven't you read 1984 or Brave New World? You only have to look at who benefits, and look what has happened 'terror wise' since 9/11. There are literally hundreds of terror groups now springing up all over the place. And then are there are all the 'anti-terror laws' (yours and mine persoanl freedoms) coming in... Arguing small details of 'conspiracy theories' here could go on forever, but look at the bigger picture - it's right there in front of your eyes there has been a revolving door between the heads of the US Federal Reserve and the leading US Banks, The Secret Services will ALWAYS lobby for more power and control - that's what they do the rich and powerful will always bend events to their advantage, getting richer and more powerful - that's what they do, that's the advantage of being rich and powerful power and wealth tends to converge and consolidate - we know this - see my first point above your not really telling me anything new |
How about this then?
5 Huge Government Conspiracies Theories That Actually Happened |
Originally Posted by bonesetter
(Post 11608773)
:lol1:
Explosions were heard and seen and recorded on film coming from the base levels, not on the 80 whatever floors where some smallish fires were - and black smoke only remember so no-where near girder bending temps ;) At a few levels down the lights, air con, lifts etc were working fine neither tower fell on top WTC7. Both free-fell on their own footprint rocket science it is? |
:lol1: falling on their own footprints is something I made up :D
To describe them pretty much collapsing on top of themselves, rather than falling sideways |
Originally Posted by bonesetter
(Post 11609546)
:lol1: falling on their own footprints is something I made up :D
To describe them pretty much collapsing on top of themselves, rather than falling sideways If they had been brought down by explosives, the pancaking would not have occurred and we would have seen a totally different result (well, apart from them being very short ;) ) |
Originally Posted by gary77
(Post 11609165)
i get what your saying , but it is strange that the fbi took all videos of the plane from local businesses and the only footage they have to show us is 5 frames
|
^ zero footage whatsoever
Oh, sorry the FBI has loads from all the cameras. That's alright then |
Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
|
And Di's murder - oops, accident
All 73 cameras en route switched off No conspiracy there either, move along now |
Yup more important things to worry about, like who's next to get evicted in big bro lol
|
Originally Posted by stipete75
(Post 11609557)
Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
|
Originally Posted by stipete75
(Post 11609557)
Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
|
also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to:rolleyes:)
this is 2001 - before the smartphone |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11609595)
also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to:rolleyes:)
this is 2001 - before the smartphone |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11609595)
also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to:rolleyes:)
this is 2001 - before the smartphone I must be getting old lol |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11609613)
I know that and you know that, but these nutters manage to ignore these blatantly obvious holes in their arguments.
|
Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
(Post 11609589)
The CCTV is looking for pickpockets, not many of them at cruising altitude..
|
Originally Posted by jonc
(Post 11609586)
What also stinks of poo poo is if you know so much about the truth of all these atrocities, and considering that a few shadey groups of omnipotent people are able to pull off one of THE most complex and elaborate operation without leaving a trace of themselves and bumping off people in the know, why or how are you able to evade these very same people? Or is it simply because they haven't come across SN yet? :Suspiciou
Those who believe mainstream stories(lies, not all are lies)are the ‘crazies’,conspiracy theorists are saner and reflect conventional wisdom. The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! Although the CIA designed propaganda seems to be wearing off,as those who do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 7/7 JFK outnumber believers by more than two to one. I am one of many millions all around the globe who doubt "some" official msm stories, and as you are probarly aware snet is hardly the holy grail of the internet. |
Originally Posted by stipete75
(Post 11609616)
Who asked you to join our convo, speak only when spoken too.............tard.:hjtwofing
|
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11609625)
You very quickly turn nasty when your alternative reality is questioned don't you?
Now do us all a favour and foooooook off:thumb: :D |
Originally Posted by stipete75
(Post 11609632)
More to the point than nasty Martin,,,,this is hardly the matrix!
Now do us all a favour and foooooook off:thumb: |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11609640)
No
|
Originally Posted by stipete75
(Post 11609622)
Wake up, the CIA invented the word conspiracy theorists.
Those who believe mainstream stories(lies, not all are lies)are the ‘crazies’,conspiracy theorists are saner and reflect conventional wisdom. The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! Although the CIA designed propaganda seems to be wearing off,as those who do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 7/7 JFK outnumber believers by more than two to one. I am one of many millions all around the globe who doubt "some" official msm stories, and as you are probarly aware snet is hardly the holy grail of the internet. |
Originally Posted by Carnut
(Post 11609283)
I've said this before but it's called gathering evidence/information for a investigation, would you rather they just guessed at what happened and maybe asked a few people on Facebook.
Understandy |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11609625)
You very quickly turn nasty when your alternative reality is questioned don't you?
|
Originally Posted by gary77
(Post 11609676)
That doesn't change the fact or the point I made. Which was that the only footage they can show us is 5 frames.
Understandy do you also know what the proximity or speed of the aircraft was when it did or didn't pass CCTV cameras |
Originally Posted by jonc
(Post 11609586)
What also stinks of poo poo is if you know so much about the truth of all these atrocities, and considering that a few shadey groups of omnipotent people are able to pull off one of THE most complex and elaborate operation without leaving a trace of themselves and bumping off people in the know, why or how are you able to evade these very same people? Or is it simply because they haven't come across SN yet? :Suspiciou
|
Or simply Guns versus Fists/Sauce pans.......
Even if it did come to light that it was an inside job......would you want to have a go? I wouldn't. Just saying. |
I've just seen this else where and had to punt it out on here.
http://www.political-humor.org/wp-co...rporations.jpg |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11609695)
do you know what the average frame rate and viewable range for, circa 1990's, CCTV technology
do you also know what the proximity or speed of the aircraft was when it did or didn't pass CCTV cameras if it did cross the viewing path of any cctv it would have been doing around 500mph i think and could of been any distance from it within reason and if it didnt pass cctv then well it doesnt matter how far away it was from the cctv it didnt pass or the speed it was doing while not passing cctv HTH |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands