Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

1000Kg Newage - gain or strain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:23 PM
  #1  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default 1000Kg Newage - gain or strain?

We all know losing 400Kg would be easier on the brakes but how would such a substantial weight loss effect the clutch, shafts, gearbox and engine?

Last edited by RS_Matt; 16 October 2014 at 05:32 PM.
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:35 PM
  #2  
g7prs's Avatar
g7prs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
Default

You'd be struggling to reach that I'd imagine. Its hard enough to get a classic to that weight.
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #3  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by g7prs
You'd be struggling to reach that I'd imagine. Its hard enough to get a classic to that weight.
Hypothetically speaking.

Would lack of weight put ease on components or would the rapid increase in RPM pick-up cause devastating friction??
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
b3nmw's Avatar
b3nmw
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: sunny wales
Default

U wouldn't be left with much
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
Fat Boy's Avatar
Fat Boy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 1
Default

It would be good, but it's purely theoretical with a lardy newage...
Old 16 October 2014 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by Fat Boy
It would be good, but it's purely theoretical with a lardy newage...
Full Carbon Fibre body, polycarbonate windows, all parasitics removed, lightweight battery, wheel, tyres, brakes etc etc most of the boot underside cut away etc etc...

1000-1100kg Newage, or classic even, suppose it doesn't matter which.
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Hypothetically speaking.

Would lack of weight put ease on components or would the rapid increase in RPM pick-up cause devastating friction??
I think sometimes you overthink stuff Matt.
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:02 PM
  #8  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Full Carbon Fibre body, polycarbonate windows, all parasitics removed, lightweight battery, wheel, tyres, brakes etc etc most of the boot underside cut away etc etc...

1000-1100kg Newage, or classic even, suppose it doesn't matter which.
Can be done but would be very expensive and time consuming.
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by Maz
I think sometimes you overthink stuff Matt.
Just a casual thought really, as my car gets ever lighter I just wondered if I'm capping or increasing the power/acceleration tolerances
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:05 PM
  #10  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
how would such a substantial weight loss effect the clutch, shafts, gearbox and engine?
In simple terms such a drastic weight loss would have no detrimental effects (strain) on mechanical components such as you have mentioned.
How you lose 400kg in the first place is the challenge. Once you start removing bodywork to acheive the weight loss you will have to put something back either to retain the shape of the car in the form of carbon or fibreglass panels, or adding some other kind of metal strengthening like a roll cage. So you will be putting weight back in at some point.
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #11  
g7prs's Avatar
g7prs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
Default

I think Andy F's car proves it doesn't
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:07 PM
  #12  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by g7prs
I think Andy F's car proves it doesn't
Yeah but that is built with race components, not chocolate WRX stuff
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
gazney101's Avatar
gazney101
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 8
From: co durham
Default

Most certainly easier on everything, apart from the wallet
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:28 PM
  #14  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:33 PM
  #15  
gazney101's Avatar
gazney101
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 8
From: co durham
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
You cant put that number on a wrx gearbox because some have let go with less but, yes thats the theory
Old 16 October 2014 | 06:50 PM
  #16  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by gazney101
You cant put that number on a wrx gearbox because some have let go with less but, yes thats the theory
Which?? I listed two theories!
Old 16 October 2014 | 07:09 PM
  #17  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

I think munching gearboxes is down to driving style, all manner of gearboxes break.
Old 16 October 2014 | 07:09 PM
  #18  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

so you want a lightweight racer and have a wrx..............


cool story bro!!!
Old 16 October 2014 | 07:12 PM
  #19  
gazney101's Avatar
gazney101
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 8
From: co durham
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt

Which?? I listed two theories!
1st one
Old 16 October 2014 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
I think munching gearboxes is down to driving style, all manner of gearboxes break.
TBH it's something that's never gone on me, blown plenty of engines and worn clutches down on other cars though.
Old 16 October 2014 | 07:14 PM
  #21  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by gazney101
1st one
The best one!
Old 16 October 2014 | 08:41 PM
  #22  
joshnosh's Avatar
joshnosh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: bedfordshire, UK
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
difficult question actually

you would think that yes it would be easier but then the engine is still producing the same torque onto the gearbox. the wheels might start turning quicker but the power is still being transmitted.

its not a concept we often come across in real life as its much harder for humans to apply the same torque when things are reacting to the torque

it will defiantly help if your launching though where your dumping all the rotational inertia off the engine into the gearbox
Old 16 October 2014 | 08:46 PM
  #23  
stevemoir's Avatar
stevemoir
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeen
Default

Save your cash and buy an ariel atom

Steve
Old 16 October 2014 | 08:46 PM
  #24  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Oh dear. We've gone from 'What's possible?' to 'What can I get away with?'
Always a direct route to failure where performance is concerned.
Old 16 October 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #25  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by joshnosh
difficult question actually

you would think that yes it would be easier but then the engine is still producing the same torque onto the gearbox. the wheels might start turning quicker but the power is still being transmitted.

its not a concept we often come across in real life as its much harder for humans to apply the same torque when things are reacting to the torque

it will defiantly help if your launching though where your dumping all the rotational inertia off the engine into the gearbox
I think someone once told me they were running a 5 speed Newage box in their classic and holding over 500 horses for a considerable time. So it'd be nice to know for future reference. I mean that's only a 150KG shedding.
Old 16 October 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #26  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
Oh dear. We've gone from 'What's possible?' to 'What can I get away with?'
Always a direct route to failure where performance is concerned.
trying to make a performance car from a wrx is the first point of failure, hes just continuing the trend
Old 16 October 2014 | 09:01 PM
  #27  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

also take a few of thesean hour before your run,,,

Old 16 October 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #28  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
also take a few of thesean hour before your run,,,

not a good solution for matt, hes full of ...............well you know
Old 16 October 2014 | 09:22 PM
  #29  
joshnosh's Avatar
joshnosh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: bedfordshire, UK
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
I think someone once told me they were running a 5 speed Newage box in their classic and holding over 500 horses for a considerable time. So it'd be nice to know for future reference. I mean that's only a 150KG shedding.
frankly mate you have 2 choices

1 get an STi.
2 get a 6 speed box
3 run the 5 speed box and be prepared to replace it at short notice
Old 16 October 2014 | 09:35 PM
  #30  
Kwik's Avatar
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
From: Gone Dark
Default

Shirley you'd start off with a classic RA.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 PM.