When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It would be good, but it's purely theoretical with a lardy newage...
Full Carbon Fibre body, polycarbonate windows, all parasitics removed, lightweight battery, wheel, tyres, brakes etc etc most of the boot underside cut away etc etc...
1000-1100kg Newage, or classic even, suppose it doesn't matter which.
Full Carbon Fibre body, polycarbonate windows, all parasitics removed, lightweight battery, wheel, tyres, brakes etc etc most of the boot underside cut away etc etc...
1000-1100kg Newage, or classic even, suppose it doesn't matter which.
Can be done but would be very expensive and time consuming.
how would such a substantial weight loss effect the clutch, shafts, gearbox and engine?
In simple terms such a drastic weight loss would have no detrimental effects (strain) on mechanical components such as you have mentioned.
How you lose 400kg in the first place is the challenge. Once you start removing bodywork to acheive the weight loss you will have to put something back either to retain the shape of the car in the form of carbon or fibreglass panels, or adding some other kind of metal strengthening like a roll cage. So you will be putting weight back in at some point.
So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
You cant put that number on a wrx gearbox because some have let go with less but, yes thats the theory
So a WRX gearbox capable of handling up to 360-370 might now be a little more comfortable at 380-400? Or is the torque gonna kill it even if the car weighed 500kg?
difficult question actually
you would think that yes it would be easier but then the engine is still producing the same torque onto the gearbox. the wheels might start turning quicker but the power is still being transmitted.
its not a concept we often come across in real life as its much harder for humans to apply the same torque when things are reacting to the torque
it will defiantly help if your launching though where your dumping all the rotational inertia off the engine into the gearbox
you would think that yes it would be easier but then the engine is still producing the same torque onto the gearbox. the wheels might start turning quicker but the power is still being transmitted.
its not a concept we often come across in real life as its much harder for humans to apply the same torque when things are reacting to the torque
it will defiantly help if your launching though where your dumping all the rotational inertia off the engine into the gearbox
I think someone once told me they were running a 5 speed Newage box in their classic and holding over 500 horses for a considerable time. So it'd be nice to know for future reference. I mean that's only a 150KG shedding.
I think someone once told me they were running a 5 speed Newage box in their classic and holding over 500 horses for a considerable time. So it'd be nice to know for future reference. I mean that's only a 150KG shedding.
frankly mate you have 2 choices
1 get an STi.
2 get a 6 speed box
3 run the 5 speed box and be prepared to replace it at short notice