Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Forester sti... 2004 or 2006 facelift?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 June 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #1  
technohead2000's Avatar
technohead2000
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Tunbridge Wells
Default Forester sti... 2004 or 2006 facelift?

Hi all,

Wanting to get back into scooby ownership (previously had a wrx 300) and fancy a forester sti. Does anyone know of significant mechanical differences between the 2004 model and the 'facelift' 2005/6? I think I prefer the look of the older ones and there also seem to be more about... Cheers!
Old 16 June 2016 | 05:53 PM
  #2  
poffer1's Avatar
poffer1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 2
From: Surrey
Default

Looked at these a short while ago and couldn't see any significant difference between 2004 and facelift variants.

Like you, I think the 2004 version looks better. I gave up looking for now as prices are a bit hot (and most that were advertised were white - which makes them look like a fridge). If sterling bounces back, I will look again.

Let us know how you get on.
Old 16 June 2016 | 06:24 PM
  #3  
technohead2000's Avatar
technohead2000
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Tunbridge Wells
Default

Thanks, good advice and agree on the fridge comment :-)

Funnily enough going to see a white one tommorrow but mainly to see if my wife likes them, she wants another Impreza...I must be the only bloke who is trying to convince his wife to get a forester rather than an Impreza!
Old 16 June 2016 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
53's Avatar
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,742
Likes: 4
From: Standing Up
Default

2.5 Engine puts me off. I went for the 2.0 SF5
Old 16 June 2016 | 07:05 PM
  #5  
poffer1's Avatar
poffer1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 2
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by 53
2.5 Engine puts me off. I went for the 2.0 SF5
There is always the JDM Cross Sports model, if the 2.5 engine worries you. Personally, I really like the way the 2.5 delivers vs the 2.0.
Old 16 June 2016 | 07:24 PM
  #6  
53's Avatar
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,742
Likes: 4
From: Standing Up
Default

Power delivery is fine although the fly by wire throttle is poo. It's more the fact that the 2.5 suffers the same failure issues as UK STis.
Old 16 June 2016 | 08:21 PM
  #7  
poffer1's Avatar
poffer1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 2
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by 53
Power delivery is fine although the fly by wire throttle is poo. It's more the fact that the 2.5 suffers the same failure issues as UK STis.
Hmmm....I didn't see hide nor hair of any failed Forester sti's when I was looking.....and the USA Forester site doesn't seem to be littered with blown Forester Turbos. In fact most seem to have done pretty high miles..

Given that I am planning to buy an FSTi when the £ recovers, I would be interested to know where you got that from.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gareth79
Subaru
3
04 July 2016 04:17 PM
Yeti-AWD
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
26
15 April 2016 02:41 PM
Neil.Taylor3
General Technical
4
05 April 2016 09:56 PM
rdb_hawkeye
Wanted
0
29 March 2016 08:32 AM
Blaize
Subaru
0
22 March 2016 04:51 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.