BHP & WHP CONFUSED...
#2
Mine is 260whp and 333bhp. (Scoobyclinic dyno)
400whp would be about 500bhp on a WRX and about 520bhp on an STi. As the STi has more tranny losses. On a fwd vehicle 400whp would be about 440bhp, less tranny losses.
400whp would be about 500bhp on a WRX and about 520bhp on an STi. As the STi has more tranny losses. On a fwd vehicle 400whp would be about 440bhp, less tranny losses.
#3
why do you literally compare wrx to sti in EVERY thread. **** me youre annoying and you do yourself no favours. The guy asked for WHP relative to BHP not ****in comparethemarket.
#4
In the USAiii everything is quoted at whp but not always correct, ive seen people with graphs of 20Gs running 400whp lol as for the donut matt he is incorrect there is no difference is transmission losses between the sti and wrx, its roughly in the region of 18-22%.
Id say there whp horsepower is same as our flywheel
example
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums//sho....php?t=2683206
Id say there whp horsepower is same as our flywheel
example
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums//sho....php?t=2683206
#5
The term for it is TROLLING.
#7
WHP is the figure that is actually measured by a dyno.
The flywheel figure is just a calculation done which assumes transmission loss at a set percentage (say, 11%) to give you a flywheel figure.
WHP is more accurate in as much as it's the actually figured measured. However, it's obviously going to be lower than a calculated flywheel figure, so BHP is often used as it's a higher, more impressive figure.
All dyno's vary though, so figures will be different, regardless of whether you quote WHP or BHP (plus weather conditions, tyre pressures etc).
The flywheel figure is just a calculation done which assumes transmission loss at a set percentage (say, 11%) to give you a flywheel figure.
WHP is more accurate in as much as it's the actually figured measured. However, it's obviously going to be lower than a calculated flywheel figure, so BHP is often used as it's a higher, more impressive figure.
All dyno's vary though, so figures will be different, regardless of whether you quote WHP or BHP (plus weather conditions, tyre pressures etc).
Trending Topics
#8
#9
So that's:
187.3 atw = 261.0 bhp (AET dyno)
260.5 atw = 332.6 bhp (Scooby Clinic Dyno)
I have printouts of both if the usual STi fanboys want to call BS.
#11
Ok for looking at shape of curve !
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wow, amazing Matt, just as a comparison, my old Spec C had 312bhp and put 265bhp of that on the road.... oh thats more than your wrx with less power probably something to do with the better diffs they put on the STI's
Last edited by TonyBurns; 12 July 2016 at 10:23 AM.
#16
#17
#23
#24
#26
aRSe_Matt's definitely been on here since that BANNED script appeard on his profile so it may well be self inflicted, although I have to say I have no idea what access restrictions are placed on a banned member if it was genuine.
Whatever, enjoy the silence!
#29
It will be temporary, many of us have been in the naughty bin from time to time.
You all missed me when I was gone, you'll feel the same about RSTWAT in a few days...afterall newbie members don't really have the wrench time in Subarus to be casting old timers out.
You all missed me when I was gone, you'll feel the same about RSTWAT in a few days...afterall newbie members don't really have the wrench time in Subarus to be casting old timers out.
#30
Thing is that doesn't apply to Matt, he actually has no idea what he's talking about.