best turbo suited for 400-420bhp on a 2.5
#1
best turbo suited for 400-420bhp on a 2.5
so ive been speaking with mark at thwaites and ive decided to dabble in a little more power for my hawk sti as im bored of the current set up. at the moment my car is running 354bhp + 400ftlbs on the below spec
closed deck 2.5
standard rods with arp rod bolts
mahle 2618 pistons
nitrided crankshaft
acl bearings throughout
heads rebuilt with upgraded springs and retainers
cosworth head gaskets
the engine was built late 2016 by scoobyclinic and has covered around 15k so far,uses no oil/water.
the rest of the car is ready to handle more power
japspeed fmic
rcm induction kit
3" decat exhaust (afterburner vortex) + rcm wrapped headers will be going on with a trick up-pipe from as performance
new walbro pump
750cc denso injectors
ap racing clutch
im really tempted by the sc42+ turbo in the for sale section but is that a 450bhp rated turbo? if so would it be too much for my car as it has standard rods?
would i be better off with a 400bhp rated turbo maybe the mdx555 - 400bhp unit?
i also mentioned meth and mark mentioned octane booster which ive never really considered or know little about it. he says he has pushed std rods to 450ftlbs before but i would probably feel better keeping them around the 420ftlbs mark.
cheers
closed deck 2.5
standard rods with arp rod bolts
mahle 2618 pistons
nitrided crankshaft
acl bearings throughout
heads rebuilt with upgraded springs and retainers
cosworth head gaskets
the engine was built late 2016 by scoobyclinic and has covered around 15k so far,uses no oil/water.
the rest of the car is ready to handle more power
japspeed fmic
rcm induction kit
3" decat exhaust (afterburner vortex) + rcm wrapped headers will be going on with a trick up-pipe from as performance
new walbro pump
750cc denso injectors
ap racing clutch
im really tempted by the sc42+ turbo in the for sale section but is that a 450bhp rated turbo? if so would it be too much for my car as it has standard rods?
would i be better off with a 400bhp rated turbo maybe the mdx555 - 400bhp unit?
i also mentioned meth and mark mentioned octane booster which ive never really considered or know little about it. he says he has pushed std rods to 450ftlbs before but i would probably feel better keeping them around the 420ftlbs mark.
cheers
The following users liked this post:
#3
#4
Because a turbo can produce X amount of BHP power does not mean that it has to be mapped as such, the SC42 would be a really nice upgrade on your engine....just get it mapped sensibly and your good to go, plus you would be future proofing as you would be able to increase the power when it suits you with the same turbo,if you have got the money Shrek"Go for it".SJ.
#5
Because a turbo can produce X amount of BHP power does not mean that it has to be mapped as such, the SC42 would be a really nice upgrade on your engine....just get it mapped sensibly and your good to go, plus you would be future proofing as you would be able to increase the power when it suits you with the same turbo,if you have got the money Shrek"Go for it".SJ.
hearing alot of different opinions on what the std rods can take isnt helping matters
#7
Shrek what turbo are you running at present?.SJ.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
In my opinion you would notice the difference the spool up and midrange would definitely be improved plus the turbo would be working much less for the same power.SJ.
#11
#12
#13
correct buddy, the bill was £7.5k from the clinic and he just couldnt stretch to have the rods done. its a shame but it is what it is, i bought the car on mileage/condition and told myself that 350bhp would be enough..................oh how i was wrong lol
The following users liked this post:
#14
I run Nitrous Formula octane booster and have been for years now especially after my rebuild,its not methanol but it does add protection to the engine by keeping the octane level as it should be for performance vehicles, put it this way mate when I don't add it I notice a small drop off in performance.SJ.
#15
I run Nitrous Formula octane booster and have been for years now especially after my rebuild,its not methanol but it does add protection to the engine by keeping the octane level as it should be for performance vehicles, put it this way mate when I don't add it I notice a small drop off in performance.SJ.
thanks
#16
No mate just chuck it right in,i usually do it when I am giving the car a good drink,most of the time my fuel tank would be around 3 quarters empty I just add the NF octane booster in and then top up with Shell Optimax/V power.SJ.
#18
ok mate thanks for the info, thats probably what i would do as i fill up every 4/5 weeks.
#19
#20
cool. I’ve got a sc42 on my 2.5 I think it’s a great turbo, you wouldn’t be disappointed even if you Cappet it? I jump nearly 60hp over the vf43 notice a huge difference not just performance wise but a much nicer drive.
#21
Please don't take this as a negative comment but, personally, I wouldn't bother. You're already at 400ftlbs and the rods you have are just about at their limit there. You're planning to shell out at minimum £1500 by the time its mapped and for what? Power/torque in a different position in the rev range and possibly more lag.
I actually cant believe the engine had the valve springs and retainers done before doing the rods. The heads aren't needed to be fettled below 500hp..
I actually cant believe the engine had the valve springs and retainers done before doing the rods. The heads aren't needed to be fettled below 500hp..
#22
#23
The following users liked this post:
#24
#28
Tech hasn’t changed since the last couple of times you posted this fella.
I’d use the smallest turbo you can for your goals and enjoy a driveble car. I run the SC360 billet turbo and it made 377 at 1.3bar on last dyno and I was told With a map tweak it will do 400 no problem. I’ve added to the spec a bit and I’m confident it’ll do the numbers without breaking a sweat.
I wouldn’t rush out to do the rods for your goals, but if they were to fail running 400+ you can’t be too surprised.
I’d use the smallest turbo you can for your goals and enjoy a driveble car. I run the SC360 billet turbo and it made 377 at 1.3bar on last dyno and I was told With a map tweak it will do 400 no problem. I’ve added to the spec a bit and I’m confident it’ll do the numbers without breaking a sweat.
I wouldn’t rush out to do the rods for your goals, but if they were to fail running 400+ you can’t be too surprised.
Last edited by MarkRF; 24 April 2020 at 10:51 PM.
The following users liked this post:
#29
My point was the engine has been built to fit a budget.
all you are now doing is pushing it to the limit of its weakest component I.e. the rods.
If you want more power the answer is to correct the weakest link now and fit forged rods.
I realise this is costly but not as expensive as when it either bends or exits the block altogether.
The following users liked this post:
#30
Ok
My point was the engine has been built to fit a budget.
all you are now doing is pushing it to the limit of its weakest component I.e. the rods.
If you want more power the answer is to correct the weakest link now and fit forged rods.
I realise this is costly but not as expensive as when it either bends or exits the block altogether.
My point was the engine has been built to fit a budget.
all you are now doing is pushing it to the limit of its weakest component I.e. the rods.
If you want more power the answer is to correct the weakest link now and fit forged rods.
I realise this is costly but not as expensive as when it either bends or exits the block altogether.
new bearings throughout
new rods/bolts
upgrade to 14mm head-studs (currently arp 11mm)
re-seat the valves/inspect the heads
re-ring the pistons and hone the block
re-face heads/block and re-build using new cosworth head-gaskets
new timing kit which needs doing this year anyway regardless of which path i choose
inspect and replace if needed the oil pump
full block gasket kit
possible upgrade to an after-market pick-up pipe and baffled sump