My price bracket is letting my get a sport from a UK dealer (will travel national for right car)

I have narrowed the spec right down to a couple of motors but I can't decide wether a 58,000 mile Jan 2000 car is better than a 32,000 mile Jan 1998 car? (FSSH on both)

On top of this, the my98 has the original bumper styling which I like more than the annoying orangey thing under the indicators on the my00

old/low or New/high? clean or orange? Heart or head?

Jon

 

Get the 2000 - the Orange things get painted black within 15 minutes - sorted, and you have a much better looking car IMHO.

Make sure they are both UK spec. as supplied and un-modded

Your Choice!!

Pete

 

Thanks Pete - a good point!!!

I deliberately did not say that the 2000 has 16" gold wheels Vs the standard 15" silver ones on the '98. I think I have just made my mind up

Jon

 

low mileage always wins the day for me.

 

2000.

MD.

 

I had a similar sort of dilemma when I bought my scoob.

I decided based on the number of miles I expected to put on the car. If you are going to pile the miles on this car, I would seriously consider going for the older low miles car. If you do not expect to use it so much (weekend car etc.) go for the higher mileage car. In that way, the average miles for the age ends up balancing out which typically means the car depreciates less.

All MHO of course

 

Depends if you want hesitation or piston slap
Those little orange things btw are for cooling the brakes, also the MY00 will be fitted with 4pots and have full colour coded body.
If the car has been looked after (in both cases) then either one will be an excellent buy, depends what you fancy really

Tony

 

Depending how many miles/how long ya gonna own it, you should consider the value when it comes to sell. The 2000 is 26k closer to 100k than the 98. Miles win for me.

 

I'd have to agree. Low mileage is the key. It just depends on how "up-to-date" you want to be. You can always spend a little bit more and get the colour-coding done later. It's up to your own personal preference at the end of the day.

 

Low miles for me to. We bought a L reg Toyota Corolla for the wife with 1 owner, 20k on the clock. She can now drive this as much as she likes without worring about putting loadsa miles on the clock.

I'm just about to get the bumpers sprayed and a set of nice alloys / wheel trims and it will look idential to a P reg.

Again, my option of course...

Gareth.

 

With modern engines, mileage isnt a problem as long as its been looked after (just bought a MY99 turbo with 55k on). I say get the 2000 model...

 

I disagree with Mr Felstead slightly. I used to believe mileage was everything, but these days it depends on condition, how the miles have been driven, and by who.

I drive a M94 MR2 with 99k miles on it. My dad drives an identical MY96 MR2, same colour, same spec with 44k miles. Mine has FTSH, and his did have until he bought it. It hasn't been serviced for 2 years now (10k miles), he fills it with cheap oil, uses spurious parts and crap tyres. I, on the other hand use fully synth oil, service every 9k miles/12 months, buy the best tyres, use OEM parts, and fix bits that dont really need doing, such as regular cambelt changes.

I also drive mine more freely - i.e. my dads has never been above 4k rpm, and they redline at 7200rpm. I believe this is not good for a high revving engine.

I think that my high miler engine will be in better nick than his.

All IMHO of course

DW

 

Drive both cars and then decide

Just because it's low mileage, doesn't mean it's not a dog and vice versa !!