Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Poor Speedo Accuracy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 June 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #1  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Just got a GPS receiver, so I've been doing the obligatory comparisons between the speedo in my MY02 WRX wagon and the speed as indicated on the receiver.

Surprised to see that an indicated 100 mph (on that well known private track that we all use) is only a true 91 mph....

Slightly less surprised to see that an indicated 30 mph on the speedo is a true 27 mph. 60 mph is a true 54 etc....

So, the speedo error seems to be reasonably linear - ie. the error is approximately the same in percentage terms, no matter what the speed.

Anyone else tried comparing GPS with speedo MPH - how accurate are you?
Old 05 June 2003 | 10:48 AM
  #2  
Hoppy's Avatar
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
From: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Post

Road Angel, UK00 with 215/40x17 tyres which over-read by an extra 1.2%. 30 = 27, 70 = 66, 100 = 95, 130 = 122.
Old 05 June 2003 | 10:51 AM
  #3  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Hi Hoppy - seems more accurate than mine.... I'm starting to assume that my speedo is a blatant liar

Or, can these GPS units misread at all???
Old 05 June 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #4  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Post

My Snooper 6 Neo gives similar results on my MY94 JDM car. I think the GPS speed should be pretty accurate as far as steady speeds are concerned. It just takes a little time to work nout the new speed if you change of course. At least the speedo is on the safe side anyway, as far as points is concerned.

Les

[Edited by Leslie - 05/06/2003 09:59:50]
Old 05 June 2003 | 11:07 AM
  #5  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Very true Les - but I was just 'upset' that my privately attained 100 mph was only 90-ish.... What does that make my privately achieved 140 worth the week before?

Cheers, HB.
Old 05 June 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
Foot_Tapper's Avatar
Foot_Tapper
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Post

What wheel & tyres are you using ??
This could possibly be related to rolling circumference of wheels.
Old 05 June 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #7  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Hi Mate - just completely standard 17 inchers, with stock Potenza 215s. Typical MY02 boggo in fact.
Old 05 June 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
Andy McCord's Avatar
Andy McCord
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 2
From: Preston
Post

my STiV's accuracy is really bad, according to the speedo im doing 100 mph on the M/Way in the morn & im not really passing anyone, either that or everybodys doing a ton, I'll have to change in to third gear me thinks
Old 05 June 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #9  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

I used to get that with a modded Polo with 14 inch wheels and 45 series tyres. Even mountain bikes used to pass me at an indicated 60.....
Old 05 June 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
midget1500's Avatar
midget1500
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
From: Bangor, Northern Ireland
Post

i know speedos are not allowed to underread but overread by 10%. is this also linked to the odometer? i.e. does this mean a 100k mile car only has 91k miles ?
Old 05 June 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Or that IM are overcharging us on servicing - ie a 7,500 mile service at only 6,750
Old 05 June 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #12  
wrrjones's Avatar
wrrjones
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Post

i just sva,d a scoob and the speedo was totally accurate at 70 it was doing 70 ...... lol...
Old 05 June 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #13  
wrrjones's Avatar
wrrjones
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Post

oops

[Edited by wrrjones - 05/06/2003 12:16:03]
Old 05 June 2003 | 01:32 PM
  #14  
fazack's Avatar
fazack
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Post

Harry,

I've just got a GPS that plugs into an Ipaq running TomTom. It too shows that the speedo is almost 10% over. I understand that it is common for most cars to be 10% over - this ensures that manaufacturers can never be accused of causing speeding offences or even accidents.

Old 05 June 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #15  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Hi Fazack - that's exactly the set up I've got. Have you visited the Tomtom site to get the latest software revisions?
Old 05 June 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #16  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Fazack - how many satellites are normally visible on yours? I usually get 6 or 7 - but have detected up to nine on the A1, M1 and M62.
Old 06 June 2003 | 11:51 AM
  #17  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Post

Yes I know how you feel about what speed you really achieved HB, and I am wondering exactly the same about how fast I really got up to on an old runway. have to try it again with the GPS I suppose.

Les
Old 06 June 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #18  
ianmiller999's Avatar
ianmiller999
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Post

I believe that it is more likely that the gps will be wrong, considering the small delay in sending and recieving signals from satelite (or however they do it). I would assume that if they can be a couple of meters out on positioning surely they could be out with calculating speed?
Old 06 June 2003 | 03:12 PM
  #19  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Could be Ian - that's what I'm trying to establish. Otherwise, what's the point of having a WRX that only does 60 in seven secs, or 100 in 20...
Old 06 June 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #20  
Neil Smalley's Avatar
Neil Smalley
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 8,204
Likes: 0
Post

Ian,
The time delay is pretty negligable(radio waves travel at the speed of light) and modern GPS units lock onto 4 or more satellites (3 for triangulation plus 1 or more for accuracy and backup). The one thing GPS is rubbish at is height because the time delay difference between 100ft and say 25ft is so small it's very hard to be accurate. Lat and long is easier because of triangulation.

At least that's how I understand it to work.
Old 06 June 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #21  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Sounds plausible Neil - so I HAVE got a lying speedo....
Old 06 June 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #22  
ianmiller999's Avatar
ianmiller999
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Post

The only reason I say that is because every car I have been in with GPS, freelander, beamer and renault. The speedo has always clocked the car at about 10% difference form the GPS.
Old 09 June 2003 | 10:16 PM
  #23  
fazack's Avatar
fazack
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Post

It would be nice to get some confirmation on this, I am sure I've read that most cars are 10% over; imagine if a car speedo was under - the manaufacturers would have their a??e sued off them by everyone with a speeding ticket.
Old 09 June 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #24  
scottywrx's Avatar
scottywrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: MK
Post

Ipaq5450 + Navman3000 + Tom Tom II .

MY01 WRX always 12% overreading ! .... Which is not too bad ... however now I know it over-reads I am tempted to go faster

Scott

Visit ScoobyCity

Old 09 June 2003 | 11:23 PM
  #25  
Gooner's Avatar
Gooner
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Post

MY 01 WRX, 18" wheels,
79 mph on GPS = 73 on speedo.
30 mph on GPS = 27 on speedo.
Snooper S6R Neo.
Old 09 June 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #26  
WRX Wannabe's Avatar
WRX Wannabe
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: Watford
Post

I have the road angel and it is about 10% out:O)

I thought ALL cars were like this...it's the law?
Old 09 June 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #27  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

Hi Scotty - mine's the Ipaq 5450, plus TomTom 2. About 10% overreading....
Old 10 June 2003 | 12:08 AM
  #28  
monstermunch's Avatar
monstermunch
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Wink

lets face it !!, the satalite has trouble keeping up with a scooby :P
Old 10 June 2003 | 08:47 AM
  #29  
Harry_Boy's Avatar
Harry_Boy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Post

That's what I thought Monstermunch.
Old 10 June 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #30  
Glenn Coombs's Avatar
Glenn Coombs
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Post

Can't you check how accurate the speedo reading is by using the indicated engine revs and the gear ratios to calculate the speed ?

I think it's something like 3000 rpm in top gear is 76mph and 4000 rpm is 100mph (on a classic scoob).



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 PM.