uk 300's
11 April 2003, 12:36 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry to hijack the thread but any of you UK 300 owners interested in this plate. open to offers
clicky
[Edited by scoobimax - 11/4/2003 12:37:22 AM]
clicky
[Edited by scoobimax - 11/4/2003 12:37:22 AM]
03 November 2003, 02:44 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Superior bugeye"? An oxymoron, surely? 
If there is such a thing though, I doubt a standard UK WRX with a few cosmetic alterations would have much to say next to a Spec C, S202 or similar.
As for the UK300's, I've seen two total writeoffs over the last couple of months, so that's at least a couple to cross off the list.
If there is such a thing though, I doubt a standard UK WRX with a few cosmetic alterations would have much to say next to a Spec C, S202 or similar.
As for the UK300's, I've seen two total writeoffs over the last couple of months, so that's at least a couple to cross off the list.
Trending Topics
03 November 2003, 02:56 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 November 2003, 03:37 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do i detect sour grapes from greasemonkey?
never mind it aint ur fault ur classic is ugly!
03 November 2003, 04:14 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What general attitude is that? The "oxymoron" comment was followed by one of these , just so there would be no doubt that it was a joke, while the bit that followed about the '300 being a cosmetically altered WRX is factually correct.
Beyond that, I have no generalised view of "bugeye owners", "blobeye owners", "classic owners" or indeed anyone else for that matter.
, just so there would be no doubt that it was a joke, while the bit that followed about the '300 being a cosmetically altered WRX is factually correct.Beyond that, I have no generalised view of "bugeye owners", "blobeye owners", "classic owners" or indeed anyone else for that matter.
03 November 2003, 05:06 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jimmymc, I have number 002 with plenty of mods and vey happy with it. 
Since this photo was taken I have had some more mods which include, tints, genunine sti WRC flaps plus somre more suspension mods and new tyres.
Nigel.
Since this photo was taken I have had some more mods which include, tints, genunine sti WRC flaps plus somre more suspension mods and new tyres.
Nigel.
04 November 2003, 12:12 AM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: here
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Greasemonkey as well. I would have been well gutted paying the premium price for a UK300 and seeing the cheaper & far superior STI Type UK come out within a matter of months
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 11:59 AM