Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

URGENT: anyone good at maths?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 March 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #1  
owbow's Avatar
owbow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Waaales
Question URGENT: anyone good at maths?

right, i've already answered this question but i'm a little dubious at the answer...


10. In a hydraulic brake system on a ProDrive Rally Car, a force of 280N is applied at the brake pedal, which has a leverage of 5:1. The Diameter of the master cylinder is 28mm, whilst the diameter of the 16 wheel cylinder pistons is 40mm. the total efficiency of the system is 88%.

a. what is the Total force exerted by the pistons
b. what is the pedal travel if each piston moves 0.2mm

hmmm i seem to get pedal travel of 52.25cm?????? or is it just a crap question?

thanks
Owain
Old 25 March 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
misty's Avatar
misty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
From: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Default

or is it just a crap question?
I don't think we need to answer that one either, do we??
dave
Old 25 March 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #3  
MTR's Avatar
MTR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Default

OWBOW,
The master cylinder travels 6.53mm.
The brake pedal travels 3.26cm.

The distance travelled by the pistons is not affected by the system efficiency.

The force (Newtons) generated at the calipers is calculated thus:


Pressure (pascals 'Pa') = force (Newtons) divided by area(sq mm)


Therefore pressure at master cylinder (28mm dia or 14mm radius) is:

(280 x 5) divided by ((14 x14)x 3.1416) = 1400 divided by 615.75 =2.2736Pa


At the calipers 40mm dia or 20mm radius:

Force (Newton) = pressure (Pa) x area

N =2.2736 x ((20 x20) x 3.1416)
N= 2.2736 x1256.6371
N=2857.15 at 100% efficiency

so is equal to 2514 Newtons per piston at 88% efficiency

The force acting on EACH piston at the calipers is 2514 Newtons.
15085 newtons on each front disc (6 pots)
5028 Newtons on each rear disc (2 pots)
Total braking force 40227 Newtons from a pedal force of 280 Newtons, at 88% efficiency.

I think.

Cheers
MTR

Last edited by MTR; 25 March 2004 at 10:38 PM. Reason: cannot write formulas on here, so have to write out long hand
Old 25 March 2004 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
papascooby's Avatar
papascooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 2
Default

i agree with mtr
Old 25 March 2004 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Pressure remains constant in the perfect closed system, therefore:
280nx5=1400n, Pressure at master cyl. = force/area = 1400/615.752mm2 = 2.274n/mm2 So this pressure will be present at each slave cyl.
Slave cyl area = 1256.64mm2, so force at one cyl. = pressure x area = 2.274n/mm2 x 1256.64 = 2857.6n So total force at 88% = 2857.6n x 16 x 0.88 = 40235n (4.1 tonnes!)

Movement of slave cyl = movement of master cyl. (closed system remember!) so pedal movement = 0.2mm x 5 = 1mm It will of course move much more than this due to flexibility, distortion, free play, expansion of flexible brake pipes (even braided) etc.
JohnD
MTR - How did you get to the pedal movement?

Last edited by JohnD; 25 March 2004 at 11:22 PM. Reason: To say that MTR is as sad as me doing this at this time of night!
Old 26 March 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #6  
MTR's Avatar
MTR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Default

John,
Volumetric displacement of 16 off 40mm diameter caliper pistons moving 0.2mm is:

((20x20)x 3.1416) x 0.2 x 16 = 4021.238 cu mm

Area of cylinder of master cylinder is:

((14 x 14) x 3.11416 = 615.75 sq mm

length of stroke of master cylinder to displace 4021.238 cu mm is:

4021.238 divided by 615.75 = 6.53mm

Pedal lever ratio is 5:1 so

6.53 x5 =32.65mm or 3.26cm pedal travel.

But as you say flexibilty in bulkhead, bushes, mecahnical linkages will play a part.

But its around that figure.

Who's sad I love it.

Edited to say, my figures would be identical to Johns for the pressure calculations, but I rounded the numberes, instead of working to the full decimal notation.
The last time I did that on here, someone had a pop.

I'm just glad they don't build aircraft.

Cheers
MTR

Last edited by MTR; 26 March 2004 at 12:22 AM. Reason: Just to add comment about rounding up
Old 26 March 2004 | 01:25 AM
  #7  
owbow's Avatar
owbow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Waaales
Default

ah-ha! saw where i'd gone wrong thanks to you guys, when i was working out the force ratio i multiplied the 20mm by 16 before i squared it! (d'oh!) ...just corrected that and my answers are exactly the same as MTR... thanks f***ing loads guys. excellent!

Owain
Old 26 March 2004 | 01:34 AM
  #8  
Hanslow's Avatar
Hanslow
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

If I understood how the brakes worked I could have contributed

I got lost when I started reading it as the car having 16 wheels and thinking one cylinder per piston

Last edited by Hanslow; 26 March 2004 at 01:36 AM. Reason: this wine made it all funny!
Old 26 March 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #9  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

MTR
I laid in bed and suddenly realised the volume of fluid displaced at the slave cyls = volume displaced at master cyl = 4021.24mm3, and as you say 4021.24/615.75 = 6.53mm. This times 5 = 32.65mm (I made the error of taking the fluid as being a "solid"). All the flex and free movement still applies. All this finally adds up to the fact that I'm double sad for getting back on the PC to post this correction!!
JohnD
Old 26 March 2004 | 07:58 AM
  #10  
rb5 286's Avatar
rb5 286
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,813
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
MTR
I laid in bed and suddenly realised the volume of fluid displaced at the slave cyls = volume displaced at master cyl = 4021.24mm3, and as you say 4021.24/615.75 = 6.53mm. This times 5 = 32.65mm (I made the error of taking the fluid as being a "solid"). All the flex and free movement still applies. All this finally adds up to the fact that I'm double sad for getting back on the PC to post this correction!!
JohnD
yep, i'd agree with u there John

its too early in the morning to understand wot the f**k u lot have just gone on about lolol but it sounds VERY interesting stuff.......
Old 26 March 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #11  
speedking's Avatar
speedking
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
From: Warrington
Exclamation but ...

MTR: although your answer is correct, a Pascal is 1N/m² not 1N/mm² 1MPa = 1N/mm².
Old 26 March 2004 | 01:32 PM
  #12  
MTR's Avatar
MTR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Default

Speedking

Originally Posted by speedking
MTR: although your answer is correct, a Pascal is 1N/m² not 1N/mm² 1MPa = 1N/mm².
I stand corrected.

Cheers
MTR
Old 01 April 2004 | 12:01 AM
  #13  
owbow's Avatar
owbow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Waaales
Default

excellent... thanks guys!

Owain
Old 01 April 2004 | 12:31 AM
  #14  
Tandy's Avatar
Tandy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

I would say if you can't stop in time take to the verge to the left of the car your about to hit.

No good at maths but have avoided a few accidents in this manner.

Tandy

ps. due for a bake upgrade!
Old 01 April 2004 | 12:33 AM
  #15  
owbow's Avatar
owbow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Waaales
Default

yep. exactly my technique... personally i call it PLAN B...

shocking how many people just cannot think in that situation....

Owain
Old 01 April 2004 | 08:54 AM
  #16  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

Eh?

Are the brakes any good then
Old 07 April 2004 | 04:02 AM
  #17  
owbow's Avatar
owbow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Waaales
Default

pretty damn good i would think!

Owain
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 08:18 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 09:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 07:12 AM
blackandz
General Technical
0
12 September 2015 08:01 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 AM.