HELP: BLOW ENGINE THREADS...
#2
Bad luck M8 but if u wrote sold as seen on the Receipt then he aint got a leg to stand on. Might sound a bit harsh but the bloke who bought it might well of done summin to it that your not aware of so it's up to him to foot the bill for the new engine/Rebuild. One of the pitfalls of buying a used car privatley!
#4
he has no leg to stand on with or without that receipt...
EVEN if you knew the engine was on it's way out, he wouldnt even then be able to do anything about it - thats assuming he could even prove you knew, which you didnt!
EVEN if you knew the engine was on it's way out, he wouldnt even then be able to do anything about it - thats assuming he could even prove you knew, which you didnt!
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Just to clarify there is no such thing as "sold as seen".
You're only liable if you knew of or suspected an engine problem, and you were asked whether any such problem existed, and you lied or failed to tell the whole truth. As long as you didn't actively misrepresent the car then you have no liability.
My old scooby suffered a big-end failure at 61000 miles. The day before it happened I'd have told you quite openly and honestly that there was nothing wrong with the engine - it's a sudden failure that often has no warning at all. In my case it was a UK car with FSSH, which is particularly unusual. STIs let go rather more often and it's down to incorrect fuel/lack of remap, or the extra power giving increased bearing loads which in turn makes them more susceptible to any lubrication problems that may occur (eg. faulty oil pumps). MAF sensors die too, sometimes with no symptoms.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
ps. it also tends to happen shortly after a service if the correct oil change procedure isn't followed, thanks to temporary oil starvation in the bearings. Had the car just been serviced?
It's totally gutting when it does happen, though, regardless of whose fault it may or may not be. I really feel for the guy
It's totally gutting when it does happen, though, regardless of whose fault it may or may not be. I really feel for the guy
#9
To clarify, in law, "Sold as Seen" means nothing.
The private seller must accurately describe the vehicle, and if this is not done the buyer may take their own legal action post sale.
However in this case, it seems that the problem did not exist until after the sale - so no problem.
The private seller must accurately describe the vehicle, and if this is not done the buyer may take their own legal action post sale.
However in this case, it seems that the problem did not exist until after the sale - so no problem.
#15
no but he did post on the internet stating that it was knackered and needed replacing. he sold it with knowledge that it was living on borrowed time. this was, if you are to take sti-v4 word for it, not the case here.
having spoken to api david it seems quite common for engines to go shortly after changing hands (talking in weeks). noe this could be because of a number of well documented reasons (particularly with imports)
1) wrong fuel used
2) top speed testing/0-60 canings
3) oil service by new owner/garage not following refill procedure
having spoken to api david it seems quite common for engines to go shortly after changing hands (talking in weeks). noe this could be because of a number of well documented reasons (particularly with imports)
1) wrong fuel used
2) top speed testing/0-60 canings
3) oil service by new owner/garage not following refill procedure
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
In that case - sorry, but I think you're going to have to fork out for the cost of the repair in this case. Even if the car seemed OK when you sold it, the requirement that the car be 'fit for purpose' and 'of merchantable quality' means you're responsible for fixing it - after all, it's hard to deny that even though there may have been no symptoms visible at the time of sale, the engine was in fact on its way out. To do so would mean proving that the car had been mistreated by its new owner in a way that could reasonably be expected to lead to engine failure.
#18
If the car was sold as seen i say that the buyer has no come back and you should not worry. When i bought my scoob from a proper 4x4 dealer and the clutch went in the first week he gave me 100 quid towards it as a goodwill guesture - he didnt have to give me anything really as i accepted the car in its current condition. I even called trading standards about it and they said i could do nothing and that the best thing i could do was politley approach the dealer agiain and ask for a compromise. I did and i got the 100 quid.
The buyer could have done al maner of things with the car - extreme he could have took it round a race track for day!
I also agree with the fuel and oil issues
Andy
The buyer could have done al maner of things with the car - extreme he could have took it round a race track for day!
I also agree with the fuel and oil issues
Andy
#19
It is probably best for you to get in touch with Trading Standards or Citizens Advice Bureau. Then you will have their take on the situation, and what they think you should do. At least that way you are more likely to know where you stand.
#20
if you are a trader you can not sell a car as "sold as seen". if there is something wrong with the car it has to be written on the receipt,and agreed between you when it is sold. as stated above the car has to be fit for purpose (there is a unwritten rule of around 6 months (although some trading standards websites do mention this sort of time frame)). i have just sue'd a car dealer for my impreza blowing up after 11 days this was deamed to be unfit for purpose. your best bet would be to offer the guy half and hope he takes it.
(btw i would expect you could get someone to rebuild it for less than 3k)
(btw i would expect you could get someone to rebuild it for less than 3k)
#23
My classic blew up 3 days after a service
W 2000 34K on the clock
I was driving hard on the day but IMHO it was something that had been done in the service(or not been done).
I hope you get it sorted out M8
W 2000 34K on the clock
I was driving hard on the day but IMHO it was something that had been done in the service(or not been done).
I hope you get it sorted out M8
#24
Customer had just purchased from an importer a similar aged car, he drove it to us & as soon as it turned up you could hear the big end knocking away.
The import company after 2 weeks of customer calls picked it up & replaced the engine.....
The import company after 2 weeks of customer calls picked it up & replaced the engine.....
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Originally Posted by donutman
if you are a trader you can not sell a car as "sold as seen". if there is something wrong with the car it has to be written on the receipt,and agreed between you when it is sold. as stated above the car has to be fit for purpose (there is a unwritten rule of around 6 months (although some trading standards websites do mention this sort of time frame)). i have just sue'd a car dealer for my impreza blowing up after 11 days this was deamed to be unfit for purpose. your best bet would be to offer the guy half and hope he takes it.
(btw i would expect you could get someone to rebuild it for less than 3k)
(btw i would expect you could get someone to rebuild it for less than 3k)
Its probably the all to common mistake of lack of research on his behalf. ie, poor quality fuel, not letting the engine warm up and cool down correctly.
Dont worry m8, you're in the clear!!!
#28
Disagree. When the car was sold it was fit for purpose. The customer accepted it in its current condition which was fit for purpose. There was no question about the condition of the engine when it was bought. The seller could not have know about it. Fit for purpose does not cover wear and tear. That engine could have gone on for months with no problem or years and would he have taken it back after say a year - no.
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
When the car was sold it was fit for purpose
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Originally Posted by AndyC_772
No, when the car was sold it had a latent defect that meant the engine wasn't going to last. The absence of any symptoms at the time means nothing, nor does the fact that the seller genuinely didn't know about the problem. The buyer is entitled to a reasonable level of service and reliability, given the car's age, mileage and price, and a dead engine in the space of a few weeks is not reasonable unless the car was virtually given away.