Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

is a bugeye better than claasic on fuel ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 September 2004, 11:34 AM
  #1  
r4_rick
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
r4_rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default is a bugeye better than claasic on fuel ?

As the title !
Also...what "improvements" did they make to the bugeye vs classic...engine, brakes, suspension, gearbox.
I AM going to join the world of scooby ownership, this sat and need your continued support and encouragement !
Cheers

Rick
Old 14 September 2004, 11:57 AM
  #2  
JonathanC
Scooby Regular
 
JonathanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Rick

I doubt the bug eye will be better that a classic as it weighs more. I guess changes in ECU over the years may affect mpg but to be honest if you are that concerned about MPG get a golf diesel, however if you want to blat around with a permanent smile on your face - BUY a SCOOBY!!

Jonathan
Old 14 September 2004, 06:09 PM
  #3  
Ubik
Scooby Regular
 
Ubik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Covered in stickers in the year of the HUGE concrete
Posts: 7,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile From my experiance...yes

Two of my mates drive classics, 160 miles to a tank no matter if they drive economically or hell for leather mode

My bugeye does 270 to a tank when I drive easy and around 220 when I push it.
I have noticed a slightly better mpg on BP & optimax but totally different performance, with BP & opti beating the standard tescos soup hands down!

All the cars are serviced and maintained regularly with frequent oil changes.

Cant comment about handling as my friends have all had a fair bit of work on their suspension. The interior was updated and was probably a factor that would have made me go for a bugeye anyway. One downside is you get a lot less engine noise than in the classic. I do enjoy driving / being in my mates car, you can really hear the banshee under the bonnet!


Not really the car to buy if you are worried about fuel costs though. I used to spend around 40 a month in my golf I now spend over 160. The grin factor alone is worth it IMHO!

Last edited by Ubik; 14 September 2004 at 06:16 PM.
Old 14 September 2004, 07:59 PM
  #4  
BrynO
Scooby Regular
 
BrynO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: www.sox-japoc.co.uk
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On last 10 fill ups on my bug I got worst average of 22, best 28 mpg so call it a steady 25. Can't see this being much diff on a late Classic so not really a deciding factor for anyone I wouldn't think.
Old 14 September 2004, 09:34 PM
  #5  
Mark_S
Scooby Regular
 
Mark_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Herts
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a classic and get exactly the same as you do, so as you say not a deciding factor.

My car would have long since gone if I only got 160miles/tank Sounds more like Evo territory.

Originally Posted by BrynO
On last 10 fill ups on my bug I got worst average of 22, best 28 mpg so call it a steady 25. Can't see this being much diff on a late Classic so not really a deciding factor for anyone I wouldn't think.
Old 14 September 2004, 09:55 PM
  #6  
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobynutta555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Getting 160 from a tank in a classic, the driver must be either mental or the car is an sti/wrx import, even then should at least be getting 180 plus.

I get circa 260 mpg from my P1 average driving.
Old 14 September 2004, 11:30 PM
  #7  
Ubik
Scooby Regular
 
Ubik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Covered in stickers in the year of the HUGE concrete
Posts: 7,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
Getting 160 from a tank in a classic, the driver must be either mental or the car is an sti/wrx import, even then should at least be getting 180 plus.

I get circa 260 mpg from my P1 average driving.
Only ever gets 160 unless hes on the motorway. Were up in Derbyshire & South Yorkshire so lots of twisty roads but we dont understand why I get so much better fuel economy.

Trending Topics

Old 15 September 2004, 08:12 AM
  #8  
Floyd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,470
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I managed over 350 to a tank on a run to Scotland and I could only fit 52ltrs in it at fill up. Didn't hang around either in my MY00 classic.

F
Old 15 September 2004, 08:18 AM
  #9  
donutman
Scooby Regular
 
donutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

don't worry about the fuel, look at the looks of the cars. There will only be one winner (the classic)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Raptorman
ScoobyNet General
0
01 October 2015 06:46 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
28 September 2015 01:06 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
26 September 2015 02:58 PM



Quick Reply: is a bugeye better than claasic on fuel ?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 PM.