Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Esso Super Unleaded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 December 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #1  
braaaptish's Avatar
braaaptish
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default Esso Super Unleaded

Esso have also gone the way of 'ultimate' 'supreme' 'optimaxy' type marketting on their Superunleaded - the thing is, it used to be rated 98 but is now only 97 ...

I was chatting to my old man yesterday - he was telling me that before the days of unleaded, you could get a couple of high octance fuel at the pumps, and when I say 'high' octane we're talking 100-102! ('Golden' any of you guys old enough to remember?) 'Course it was all leaded, but jeez 100+? that's almost Avgas territory!
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #2  
Engineer@Uni's Avatar
Engineer@Uni
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

dude, you have to take into account something that seems to escape most people: Octane rating doesnt actualley relate to the calorific output of the fuel (hence it's 'power') but to the sensitivity the fuel exhibits to 'knock' (commonly refered to as Detonation or 'det'). Hence, higher octane fuel doesn't necesarily mean you'll get more power out of it. It does mean that your car can dial in more ignition advance and injection pulse with less fear of detonation, and as far as i know, subarus have a detonation-detection mechanism that will lessen ignition advance if it detects your cylinders getting close to the crucial points. Overall, higher octane fuel is safer, but not necessarily faster.
-Antonis
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #3  
Daz34's Avatar
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

/\ What he says /\

Esso SU was rated 97 before anyway & not 98
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
braaaptish's Avatar
braaaptish
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

ah Ok; the finery of knock resistance vs energy capacity has indeed escaped me ... but all else being equal, an engine that can modify it's advance curve electronically to take advantage of the shift in the knocking point will no doubt make more power the more advance? to a point no doubt ...

@daz34 - the pumps actuially stated 98 on them ...
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #5  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Likes: 53
Default

SUL used to be 98RON in the UK, it was dropped to 97RON about 3 years ago.
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #6  
Daz34's Avatar
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

Originally Posted by johnfelstead
SUL used to be 98RON in the UK, it was dropped to 97RON about 3 years ago.
So we are all right then
Old 06 December 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #7  
misty's Avatar
misty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
From: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Default

I remember the good old days (early seventies!!)of five star fuel mate which was 100 octane rated!!
I used to run a 1600 gt cortina with the head skimmed right down and it would pink like a pig on anything except five star.
dave
Old 06 December 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #8  
braaaptish's Avatar
braaaptish
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

lol - the thing is, my nearest garage only apparently swapped over in the last week or so - hence the basis and point for the thread ...

I wonder if the measurement basis has changed - eg the US 'RON' system differs from the UK.
Old 06 December 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Likes: 53
Default

it was full of lead, nice
Old 06 December 2004 | 06:02 PM
  #10  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by braaaptish

I wonder if the measurement basis has changed - eg the US 'RON' system differs from the UK.
The USA dont use RON, they use PON (pump octane number)

PON=RON+MON/2
Old 06 December 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #11  
Flatcapdriver's Avatar
Flatcapdriver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
From: www.tiovicente.com
Default

Originally Posted by braaaptish
Course it was all leaded, but jeez 100+? that's almost Avgas territory!
AVGAS is 100LL - low lead so the stuff you're talking about would exceed this.
Old 06 December 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
Dazza's-STi's Avatar
Dazza's-STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: Some say he has frost on his helmet...
Default

Ok this my not be a scientific appriasal but my car goes like stink on sainsburys SUL
It runs like a pig and BP Ultimate... probably becouse its so f$%£$ expensive its crap! and it between the two on Optimax ...

The reason i'm so happy is that one the car really feel great on S-SUL and the stuff cost the least at 84.9 ppl I can't believe it...

The difference is amazing id stuck £15 of BP in and it just ran crap... very uneaven through the revs.. you could feel it backing on and off as it pulled... got down to very empty.. maybe just a couple of litres left put in £15 wot of the Sainsbury stuff and it clear as night and day... very srong! I've now done this about 6 times becouse it thought i was going mad, and for defo the Sainsburys stuff is the best, better even than the optimax...

It would be interesting to see what others think...!

dazza
Old 06 December 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #13  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

Sainsbury's SUL used to be my close second choice in my 172 (after optimax), and to be honest the car performed equally well on it!

Haven't tried it in scoob yet though, although I'd agree with BP Ultimate being crappy!

Dazza's STI- what year is your STI?
Old 06 December 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #14  
Kartingsteve's Avatar
Kartingsteve
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: surrey
Default

just put the new esso sul in last week after optimax and it does seem to be running much better especially low down.
Old 06 December 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #15  
Engineer@Uni's Avatar
Engineer@Uni
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Speaking of BP Ultimate, jasonius, 9 months before it was launched in the UK it was tested in Greece, and over there you can still get it at a breath-taking 100 octane... It's honestly not bad, I came over to the UK and smilingly pumped my car full of Ultimate at the first BP I found and was left with my mouth gapping wide. The Ultimate you get over here is not only 97 octane, its also hopelessly underpowered. I'm pretty happy with both Esso 97 and Optimax nowadays though. But I'm still looking forward to going back to Greece for some of that good BP stuff...
Old 06 December 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #16  
Bubba po's Avatar
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Talking

Originally Posted by johnfelstead
The USA dont use RON, they use PON (pump octane number)

PON=RON+MON/2
They do PON RON MON

They do John, mon.
Old 06 December 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #17  
RRH's Avatar
RRH
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
From: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Default

lmao
Old 07 December 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #18  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Likes: 53
Default

Old 07 December 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #19  
Dazza's-STi's Avatar
Dazza's-STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
From: Some say he has frost on his helmet...
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Sainsbury's SUL used to be my close second choice in my 172 (after optimax), and to be honest the car performed equally well on it!

Haven't tried it in scoob yet though, although I'd agree with BP Ultimate being crappy!

Dazza's STI- what year is your STI?
03 m8
Old 07 December 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #20  
kbsub's Avatar
kbsub
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Kamloops British Columbia Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi
Ok this my not be a scientific appriasal but my car goes like stink on sainsburys SUL
It runs like a pig and BP Ultimate... probably becouse its so f$%£$ expensive its crap! and it between the two on Optimax ...

The reason i'm so happy is that one the car really feel great on S-SUL and the stuff cost the least at 84.9 ppl I can't believe it...

The difference is amazing id stuck £15 of BP in and it just ran crap... very uneaven through the revs.. you could feel it backing on and off as it pulled... got down to very empty.. maybe just a couple of litres left put in £15 wot of the Sainsbury stuff and it clear as night and day... very srong! I've now done this about 6 times becouse it thought i was going mad, and for defo the Sainsburys stuff is the best, better even than the optimax...

It would be interesting to see what others think...!



dazza
yes coundnt agree more , car goes like stink (04 sti ppp ) have you noticed the stronger smell as well ? , its 83.9 at Colton Leeds store which is cheaper than normal unleaded at most other garages






Old 07 December 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #21  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
They do PON RON MON

They do John, mon.
PMSL Top class
Old 07 December 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #22  
braaaptish's Avatar
braaaptish
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

"noticed the smell"

apparently (and no doubt been covered a thousand times on here already?) - the current crop of SUL have a very short shelf life - examples quote anything between 3days and two weeks ... ever had 'difficulty' starting when not used your motor for a couple of weeks? The fuel's lost its edge - characterised by the distinct lack of the usual petrol type arooooma

Other forums I've been on cite Optimax as particularly prone to this and I've even seen copy documents showing that Optimax is actually deliverd at something like 100RON and due to the old **** it gets mixed with ends up being 97 through the pumps and after a few days is no better than regular ... I've noticed this myself as a performance drop off when stretching a single full tank of the stuff to over a week.
Old 07 December 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #23  
Daz34's Avatar
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

Sainsbury's SUL used to be my close second choice in my 172 (after optimax), and to be honest the car performed equally well on it!
Mine is definately smoother lower down on Esso SUL as opposed to Optimax which I used solidly for a year.

Last edited by Daz34; 07 December 2004 at 07:58 PM.
Old 07 December 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #24  
TDT's Avatar
TDT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
From: Stella Brewery
Default

Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi
my car goes like stink on sainsburys SUL
It runs like a pig on BP Ultimate...
Unless Sainsburys have changed their supplier in the last few months, Sainsburys fuel is supplied by BP. The same stuff just with a JS label on it.

AFAIK anyway
Old 07 December 2004 | 04:24 PM
  #25  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Ahh the sixties, I remember it well. I had a couple of Rover 2000 TC's back then and HAD to use 100 octane - and it still pinked! Shell was the best at 101
Why do other European countries get higher octane fuel?
I remember de-coking one of the Rovers at 20k - the valves were laden with crud! More recently a Mondeo with 35k had no build-up on the inlet valves at all. It shows how petrol and oil have improved over the years.
I reckon there could be a lot of "placebo" effect between brands?
JohnD

Last edited by JohnD; 07 December 2004 at 04:27 PM.
Old 07 December 2004 | 04:25 PM
  #26  
kbsub's Avatar
kbsub
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Kamloops British Columbia Canada
Default

Originally Posted by TDT
Unless Sainsburys have changed their supplier in the last few months, Sainsburys fuel is supplied by BP. The same stuff just with a JS label on it.

AFAIK anyway

In the north (Yorkshire , Lancashire ) Sainsbury load there petrol at Linsey oil refinery at Immingham which is owned by TOTAL , might be different in other parts of the country , All supermarkets buy there petrol of the major oil companies as they dont have refinerys
Old 07 December 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #27  
Scott.T's Avatar
Scott.T
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 1
From: East Sussex
Default

Optimax seems to drop power on my TEK'd MY00 too.....
If I put £40 in it will last me about 2 weeks. In this time the last 1/3 or so of a tank it starts to feel a little flat.
I couldn't really put it down to the fuel until I started using ESSO SUL on a regular bassis.

With the ESSO the car seems to perform well and consistant irrespective of what level or how long it's been in the tank (within reason).

The Knock sensor activity is pretty much the same too...

I also found with Optimax that my old MY94 would hesitate when first driven in the morning slowing down for speed bumps in my street. I tried all sorts of things to fix it, but after using different fuel whilst away on holiday the hesitance stopped. Optimax in the tank the week we got back and it came back within a couple of days.

thinking about it the MY00 also is more surgey when cold too, when using Optimax.

I also think my local Optimax forcourt doesn't get through much, so it probably sits in the tanks a bit longer then those in more afluant area's of the country.

I might try Sainsbury's SUL next week, cause their right next door to the ESSO. Which is nice cause it helps keep the ESSO a little cheaper due to the competition, about 86.6p I think (Only 3p more the UL).

P.S The BP Ultimate about 1/4 from there it a rip off at 90.6p

Last edited by Scott.T; 07 December 2004 at 11:42 PM.
Old 08 December 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #28  
Andy_1271's Avatar
Andy_1271
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Default

My Dad's old Norton 750 commandos both ran on 5 -star, every once in a while he manages to get hold of some AVgas just to turn the engines over for a few minutes
Old 08 December 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #29  
Vegescoob's Avatar
Vegescoob
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
Ahh the sixties, I remember it well. I had a couple of Rover 2000 TC's back then and HAD to use 100 octane - and it still pinked! Shell was the best at 101
Why do other European countries get higher octane fuel?
I remember de-coking one of the Rovers at 20k - the valves were laden with crud! More recently a Mondeo with 35k had no build-up on the inlet valves at all. It shows how petrol and oil have improved over the years.
I reckon there could be a lot of "placebo" effect between brands?
JohnD
Ah!! The good old days. Can't remember the last time I de-coked an engine. We tend to foget how much maintenance we had to do in them past times.
I just love modern cars. Lots of power smoothly and reliably, most handle well and with a bit of care and attention go on for years.
Old 08 December 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #30  
drumsterphil's Avatar
drumsterphil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Co Durham
Default

Just to add,

Had Esso SUL tested about a year ago when we suspected an engine problem had been caused by bad fuel. Rang Esso up, they tested the batch and it came back as 98.4ron.

Swear by the stuff, car feels more 'alive' on Esso SUL than 'Opti/mate'.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 AM.