Sti and Evo question??
#1
Sti and Evo question??
I'm still torn between buying an STI or an Evo 8 at the moment.
Im swaying towards the Evo slightly for performance values alone but am put off by the 4500 miles service periods.
So to cut to the chase is there any STI versions that could out perform most evos tuned or otherwise??
Obviously im looking at spending 25k upwards so it needs to be the right decision.
Cheers
Im swaying towards the Evo slightly for performance values alone but am put off by the 4500 miles service periods.
So to cut to the chase is there any STI versions that could out perform most evos tuned or otherwise??
Obviously im looking at spending 25k upwards so it needs to be the right decision.
Cheers
#2
http://www.type-25.com/
http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/s...asp?img=s203_3
http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/s...my05_spec.html
If you want a UK car to match the top Evo's you'll be waiting a while, 'til the rumoured 2.5 STi PPP @ 350bhp is out. Due November, but don't hold your breath.
http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/s...asp?img=s203_3
http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/s...my05_spec.html
If you want a UK car to match the top Evo's you'll be waiting a while, 'til the rumoured 2.5 STi PPP @ 350bhp is out. Due November, but don't hold your breath.
#4
Originally Posted by SPEN555
Buy an Evo if ya can't drive ant-yaw and all it's electronics will get you round the bends for ya.
#5
Originally Posted by SPEN555
Buy an Evo if ya can't drive ant-yaw and all it's electronics will get you round the bends for ya.
Buy a scoob if you want a 4*4 turbo motor and learn how to drive one
Buy a scoob if you want a 4*4 turbo motor and learn how to drive one
The DCCD-A doobery bobby thing is probably more sophisticated than the ACD/AYC fitted to some of the Evo range meaning the Evo is the purer drive. Who the **** wants pure anyway ! Speed give me what I need . And for that an Evo is probably better, specially when the modding disease takes hold. Still miss the old flat 4 decat warble though .
#6
Im swaying towards the Evo slightly for performance values alone but am put off by the 4500 miles service periods.
I gather the EVO 260 has longer service intervals and my mate who sells them reckons that they are nearer 280BHP though he wouldn't have an evo as an every day car!
I gather the EVO 260 has longer service intervals and my mate who sells them reckons that they are nearer 280BHP though he wouldn't have an evo as an every day car!
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by powerman1
low 20MPG along with more regular services and it looks a tad expensive to run for that little bit extra 0-60 powerman
#10
yes i have driven one and the figures i quote are only extracted from reading magazines and the like.the question of reliabilty is a little subjective because most scoobys and evos are extremely reliable and its usually abuse that will effect any cars reliability..i.e trackdays...continuous 0-60 starts..1/4 mile thrashes etc etc but it cant be disputed that the services are a little bit to frequent for anybodys wallet... powerman
#13
Originally Posted by BillyBong
What sloblocks
The DCCD-A doobery bobby thing is probably more sophisticated than the ACD/AYC fitted to some of the Evo range meaning
The DCCD-A doobery bobby thing is probably more sophisticated than the ACD/AYC fitted to some of the Evo range meaning
However, it don't make the car go round corners by its self. It allows the chassis tuners to set up a car with no understeer without it being such an animal that it spins without warning. It does make the performance more accessable, getting my STi round a tight slippery bend without terminal understeer is much harder to do than my EVO was.
Both great cars though.
#14
I had an evo 6gsr before the sti8 ppp I have now and from experience of having both cars:-
perfomance - The evo was quicker, the power rush was nearly instant and a quick steer was always guanteed.
looks - The scoob better looking.
service costs- No contest...the scoob wins hands down and you don't get that fab boxer zorst note from the evo!!!
perfomance - The evo was quicker, the power rush was nearly instant and a quick steer was always guanteed.
looks - The scoob better looking.
service costs- No contest...the scoob wins hands down and you don't get that fab boxer zorst note from the evo!!!
#15
#16
Originally Posted by Gary C
The AYC/ACD is WAY more sophisticated than any DCCD !!!! the ACD splits torque front/back, the AYC splits torque left/right on the rear axle on instructions from the CPU based on the cars pitch and yaw rates as well as steering and throttle inputs. As far as I know the DCCD only splits torque front/back.
However, it don't make the car go round corners by its self. It allows the chassis tuners to set up a car with no understeer without it being such an animal that it spins without warning. It does make the performance more accessable, getting my STi round a tight slippery bend without terminal understeer is much harder to do than my EVO was.
Both great cars though.
However, it don't make the car go round corners by its self. It allows the chassis tuners to set up a car with no understeer without it being such an animal that it spins without warning. It does make the performance more accessable, getting my STi round a tight slippery bend without terminal understeer is much harder to do than my EVO was.
Both great cars though.
Agreed both fab cars and the Evo is more expensive to service
Big power engine tuning on an Evo is easier than a Scooby I think. Have u guys heard on TOTB ? Ahem.
#17
Originally Posted by prodriveuk
I had an evo 6gsr before the sti8 ppp I have now and from experience of having both cars:-
perfomance - The evo was quicker, the power rush was nearly instant and a quick steer was always guanteed.
looks - The scoob better looking.
service costs- No contest...the scoob wins hands down and you don't get that fab boxer zorst note from the evo!!!
perfomance - The evo was quicker, the power rush was nearly instant and a quick steer was always guanteed.
looks - The scoob better looking.
service costs- No contest...the scoob wins hands down and you don't get that fab boxer zorst note from the evo!!!
I know of an evo that hasnt had an ayc service for 25000 and still going strong
#18
Scooby Regular
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
From: My Beautiful STi is now sold, tho on the look out for another MINT scoob.
Originally Posted by Turbo Dave
I'm still torn between buying an STI or an Evo 8 at the moment.
Im swaying towards the Evo slightly for performance values alone but am put off by the 4500 miles service periods.
So to cut to the chase is there any STI versions that could out perform most evos tuned or otherwise??
Obviously im looking at spending 25k upwards so it needs to be the right decision.
Cheers
Im swaying towards the Evo slightly for performance values alone but am put off by the 4500 miles service periods.
So to cut to the chase is there any STI versions that could out perform most evos tuned or otherwise??
Obviously im looking at spending 25k upwards so it needs to be the right decision.
Cheers
The whloe EVO range has a £4000 off the RRP... Bargin.....
You can now get a MR for £23995 & poss free servicing, & the EVO 260 for £19995, WRC have done a conversion new zorst & remap etc...for £1700 & this takes the BHP up to 350bhp
I know which one i would buy if I was in the hunt for a new car.....
#19
Originally Posted by BillyBong
Big power engine tuning on an Evo is easier than a Scooby I think. Have u guys heard on TOTB ? Ahem.
If you don't plan to keep whatever car you buy for too long, the Evo 'should' be easier to sell on, with less depreciation in value.
Big STi vs. Evo thing in Japan on Sunday - will be nice to get the results of this one compared to the last one I had (which was pretty much even).
#20
Originally Posted by highlander68k
Easier, only if you've got enough money to throw at it. <cough, Andy F 10.5 for £20k inc. cost of car, cough>
If you don't plan to keep whatever car you buy for too long, the Evo 'should' be easier to sell on, with less depreciation in value.
Big STi vs. Evo thing in Japan on Sunday - will be nice to get the results of this one compared to the last one I had (which was pretty much even).
If you don't plan to keep whatever car you buy for too long, the Evo 'should' be easier to sell on, with less depreciation in value.
Big STi vs. Evo thing in Japan on Sunday - will be nice to get the results of this one compared to the last one I had (which was pretty much even).
I think what u said in the last line pretty much sums most of it up really. They are pretty much even by and large, the JDMs. Especially as the understeer has been tuned out of the newer cars, real shame the burble is gone I understand. 21K for a new 350HP Evo does seem like good value though. I love them both , fantastic cars. Looking forward to seeing the next gen Scooby and Evo (the X, the IX is not a radical step forward).
#21
I've had 2 Evo's (MR340'S with decat) Fast yes, but throw them into a corner like you can the MY05 STI and you'd be having a conversation with farmer Giles in the next field intead of going round the corner.
I don't know where the idea of Evo's are good handling cars comes from. The Sti is far superiour.
Power wise they are outstanding, basically it's the same engine and they just up the power to what they want. When I wanted a decat fitting to the car the dealer did it no problem, try asking a Subaru dealer to do that.
Using it as a daliy driver I found hard after a while, and w@nkers want to steal it all the time, it's not worth the hassle.
I don't know where the idea of Evo's are good handling cars comes from. The Sti is far superiour.
Power wise they are outstanding, basically it's the same engine and they just up the power to what they want. When I wanted a decat fitting to the car the dealer did it no problem, try asking a Subaru dealer to do that.
Using it as a daliy driver I found hard after a while, and w@nkers want to steal it all the time, it's not worth the hassle.
#22
Originally Posted by compshack
I don't know where the idea of Evo's are good handling cars comes from. The Sti is far superiour.
Last edited by BillyBong; 15 April 2005 at 02:04 PM.
#23
Hmmm mabe it is. Each to his own, only my opinion, enough to get rid though. I thought it might have been the car but two the same.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
#24
Originally Posted by compshack
Hmmm mabe it is. Each to his own, only my opinion, enough to get rid though. I thought it might have been the car but two the same.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
#25
Originally Posted by compshack
Hmmm mabe it is. Each to his own, only my opinion, enough to get rid though. I thought it might have been the car but two the same.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
I have had plenty of performance cars, and I am police advanced driver. But maybe it is me.
As you say and I agree with you. Each to his own.
#26
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Glennage
The one thing the EVO does lack which the Scoob WILL have in spades.....Character and Soul........
I respected the Evo's performance immensely (EVO 6 GSR), but it left me a bit cold. Drove a Scooby and it just seemed a "nicer" car in several senses of the word Also, I'd fallen in love with the sound of the flat four!!
It's not like you'd feel hard done by in an Evo though is it? You'd certainly be going very quickly.
NS04
#27
Had Blobeye with PPP, Brakes, Whitline kit ect, very nice car loved every minute of it, Now got MR 300 with Exhaust, Decat Fantastic piece of kit much harder edged than Scooby, still miss that flat four rumble! Would I come back yes, but it would have to be the real deal from the factory ie twin scroll turbo, HID's, rear wiper jap spec engine internals, three year warranty UK car free servicing ect, same as I get with the MR. No more short changing from IM in the UK!!
John
John
#28
Originally Posted by DBY
Had Blobeye with PPP, Brakes, Whitline kit ect, very nice car loved every minute of it, Now got MR 300 with Exhaust, Decat Fantastic piece of kit much harder edged than Scooby, still miss that flat four rumble! Would I come back yes, but it would have to be the real deal from the factory ie twin scroll turbo, HID's, rear wiper jap spec engine internals, three year warranty UK car free servicing ect, same as I get with the MR. No more short changing from IM in the UK!!
John
John
Edited to agree with both Glennage and NS04 about the character and soul but I expect without the burble some of this has gone ?
Last edited by BillyBong; 15 April 2005 at 04:37 PM.
#29
Originally Posted by BillyBong
I do not believe this to be correct. AYC splits torque left to right on the rear axle yes. ACD does not move torque front to back where as DCCD does. ACD only governs the time it takes to release the the centre diff when u turn the steering wheel. In tarmac it is released immediately, in gravel mode it takes 2-3 secs and in snow it takes 5-6 secs. I think this makes the Subaru chasssis more advanced as the Evo is locked at 50:50 whereas the Scoob isn't .
Agreed both fab cars and the Evo is more expensive to service
Big power engine tuning on an Evo is easier than a Scooby I think. Have u guys heard on TOTB ? Ahem.
Agreed both fab cars and the Evo is more expensive to service
Big power engine tuning on an Evo is easier than a Scooby I think. Have u guys heard on TOTB ? Ahem.
Hoever, the ACD is nice but the AYC is the more advanced thing. Actually, the AYC does not quite split the torque left to right. Technically it actually speeds up or slows down the left hand wheel with regard to the speed of the right hand wheel though this obviously affects the torque split. This allows it to impart a certain amount of rear steer as well as acting as an LSD, (got an old one in the garage, facinating to take to bits).
Mind you, the Skyline GTR V-Spec is even more advanced (Side wheel drive anyone ?)
One thing though, the EVO does not have the soul of the STi, I love the sound but am having pangs for another EVO.
Compshac, suprised by your comments. My EVO handled better than my STi (not by much and the grip is the same(ish)). The EVO (at least the V anyway) feels at first as if it would be a spin freak and indeed at lower speeds it does oversteer nicely, but at higher speeds they are fantastically stable without the nasty understeer the standard STi suffers.
Last edited by Gary C; 15 April 2005 at 06:34 PM.
#30
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by BillyBong
Edited to agree with both Glennage and NS04 about the character and soul but I expect without the burble some of this has gone ?
I'm told even the JDMs still sound very nice......but I'd hate to loose that burble!
NS04