Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

wrx 280bhp sub 5 sec 0-60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 May 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
wrx-03's Avatar
wrx-03
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default wrx 280bhp sub 5 sec 0-60?

As title, would an 03 blobeye with 280bhp and the torque that comes with that figure be capable of sub 5 second 0-60 time?
Old 15 May 2006 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
trails's Avatar
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,352
Likes: 56
From: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Default

i believe a classic with circa 280 does it in around 4.6...hope that helps!
Old 15 May 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #3  
abc's Avatar
abc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by wrx-03
As title, would an 03 blobeye with 280bhp and the torque that comes with that figure be capable of sub 5 second 0-60 time?
Given that a PPPd WRX has about 260 bhp and is quoted as 4.8 0-60, I'd have thought so.
Old 15 May 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Originally Posted by wrx-03
As title, would an 03 blobeye with 280bhp and the torque that comes with that figure be capable of sub 5 second 0-60 time?
Yep, but you'd need to be brutal with it to get into the 4's. I wouldn't do it everyday. What it oes mean is that you'll be able to pull of times in the 5s without being brutal; that's the real value!

Ns04
Old 15 May 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #5  
wrx-kris's Avatar
wrx-kris
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Default

dont think your clutch will last long either!
Old 15 May 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #6  
scoobypeterpump's Avatar
scoobypeterpump
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Classic's Rule
Default

here you go mate
power 280bhp
weight 1395kg
0-60 4.9sec
0-100 13.1sec
60-100 8.2sec
1/4 mile 13.6sec
Old 15 May 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #7  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by wrx-kris
dont think your clutch will last long either!
My OE clutch lasted 40k miles with plenty of launches.
Old 15 May 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #8  
Stainy's Avatar
Stainy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scoobypeterpump
here you go mate
power 280bhp
weight 1395kg
0-60 4.9sec
0-100 13.1sec
60-100 8.2sec
1/4 mile 13.6sec
Except it's 1350Kg (/disclaimer.....at least mine is, according to the vin plate)
Old 15 May 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #9  
scoobypeterpump's Avatar
scoobypeterpump
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Classic's Rule
Default

Originally Posted by Stainy
Except it's 1350Kg (/disclaimer.....at least mine is, according to the vin plate)
Here is the weight of all Impreza's 2003
Impreza WRX 03 1395kg
Impreza WRX PPP 1395kg
Impreza WRX Sti (Import) 1380kg
Impreza WRX Sti Spec C 1380kg
Old 15 May 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #10  
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 27
From: Cheshire
Cool

Got a video of my Type R doing a pretty much bang on 4 secs 0-60... maybe slightly under... 0-100 just under 9 secs... dunno how to upload them on here though...? But if was very quick before the bottom end started to rattle... lol
Old 15 May 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #11  
wrx-03's Avatar
wrx-03
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Cheers all,

Just got hold of a prodrive sports down pipe and will be getting Afterburner cat pipe and centre section soon along with uprated fuel pump and filter. Already have a vortex back box.

Then save up for the re-map at Powerstation.

Hope this lot should get me to 280bhp.

Do STI tmic and turbos come up often on here and how much ££
Old 15 May 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #12  
GazTheHat's Avatar
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
From: 392/361 MY04 STi
Default

Originally Posted by wrx-03
Cheers all,

Just got hold of a prodrive sports down pipe and will be getting Afterburner cat pipe and centre section soon along with uprated fuel pump and filter. Already have a vortex back box.

Then save up for the re-map at Powerstation.

Hope this lot should get me to 280bhp.

Do STI tmic and turbos come up often on here and how much ££
How come you didn't go for the Afterburner down pipe as well? Just as a matter of interest, or did the Prodrive one come up for a good price.
(I've got the AB DP, De-cat, Cente, Ninja BB). Fitting on monday, can't wait!!!!!!!!!! Mapping a week on wed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! zoom-zoom

Keep an eye on the For Sale section. I've seen a few STi TMIC recently...
Old 15 May 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #13  
wrx-03's Avatar
wrx-03
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Just got the prodrive sports downpipe of a guy on scoobynet this week. Un-used and still in wrapper.

A big saving :-)
Old 15 May 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #14  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by scoobypeterpump
Here is the weight of all Impreza's 2003
Impreza WRX Sti Spec C 1380kg
Which one?

16 inch version = 1320kg (this is the motorsport version btw, comes with steel wheels and no goodies)
17 inch version = 1350kg
Spec C Limited = 1370kg

There ya go

Tony
Old 15 May 2006 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Red face

Originally Posted by Scoobyslammed
Got a video of my Type R doing a pretty much bang on 4 secs 0-60... maybe slightly under... 0-100 just under 9 secs... dunno how to upload them on here though...? But if was very quick before the bottom end started to rattle... lol
You must have done alot to it to get it to do 0-100 in 9 secs

Tony
Old 15 May 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #16  
scrappy doo puppy power's Avatar
scrappy doo puppy power
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: normanton
Default

Originally Posted by abc
Given that a PPPd WRX has about 260 bhp and is quoted as 4.8 0-60, I'd have thought so.
just wanted to know i have the sti with ppp 300bhp and was told that did 0 to 60 in 4.8 which is correct can't both be same can they
Old 15 May 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #17  
phm's Avatar
phm
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Default

The power to wieght ratio (190bhp/ton iI think) on the WRX PPP is better than the standard STI, hence the quick 0-60. 4.8 is correct for the WRX PPP.
Old 15 May 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
Crosstalk's Avatar
Crosstalk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Default

Should be possible with 280 BHP, although you'd have to have almost no fuel, and no passengers. Performance Car tested an empty tanked, single occupant standard 97MY, at Santa Pod and it did it in 5.02 seconds or something like that. It was reg no. P116 EVP or thereabouts IIRC, in red, it appeared in various magazines around 1996/7 as the test car and I've driven that same car round Millbrook.
Old 15 May 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #19  
scrappy doo puppy power's Avatar
scrappy doo puppy power
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: normanton
Default

but with 40bph more and not weighing much more you would expect the sti ppp to be quicker
Old 15 May 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #20  
Gav-WRX's Avatar
Gav-WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
You must have done alot to it to get it to do 0-100 in 9 secs

Tony
i can say this was once a quick car and it will be back very soon even quicker
Old 15 May 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #21  
scoobypeterpump's Avatar
scoobypeterpump
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Classic's Rule
Default

Originally Posted by scrappy doo puppy power
just wanted to know i have the sti with ppp 300bhp and was told that did 0 to 60 in 4.8 which is correct can't both be same can they
power 300bhp
weight 1380kg
0-60 4.5sec
0-100 12.0sec
60-100 7.4sec
1/4 mile 13.2sec
Old 15 May 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #22  
Spirit's Avatar
Spirit
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

Some interesting figures in this thread. Anyone know what the exact 0-60 time of a MY98 JDM STi running about 310bhp would be?

I was guessing around 4.6 but looking at some of the stats above maybe a tiny bit quicker?

Cheers!
Old 15 May 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #23  
hades's Avatar
hades
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
From: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by scoobypeterpump
power 300bhp
weight 1380kg
0-60 4.5sec
0-100 12.0sec
60-100 7.4sec
1/4 mile 13.2sec
Thing is IIRC, the UK STi is signficantly heavier than the WRX - again IIRC it was of the order of 1470kg or something equally silly.

Prodrive did indeed quote 4.6 for the STi PPP. The Prodrive figures are about the best that would ever be repeatably acheived with lowish fuel load, very hard driving etc and most people would be a few tenths slower on a good run. It is true that a few mags did get some pretty remarkable times for fairly standard classic UK turbos. Spirit - on a perfect launch, ideal gear changes etc probably around 4.5 or maybe 4.4 might be on the cards, but in "normal" circumstances you ought to be able to get under 5 repeatably.
Old 15 May 2006 | 11:22 PM
  #24  
gant's Avatar
gant
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: west mids
Default

does anyone know the spec on a legacy twin turbo???
Old 16 May 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #25  
bob r's Avatar
bob r
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,381
Likes: 0
From: Probably polishing it.Lol
Default

Originally Posted by hades
Thing is IIRC, the UK STi is signficantly heavier than the WRX - again IIRC it was of the order of 1470kg or something equally silly.

Prodrive did indeed quote 4.6 for the STi PPP. The Prodrive figures are about the best that would ever be repeatably acheived with lowish fuel load, very hard driving etc and most people would be a few tenths slower on a good run. It is true that a few mags did get some pretty remarkable times for fairly standard classic UK turbos. Spirit - on a perfect launch, ideal gear changes etc probably around 4.5 or maybe 4.4 might be on the cards, but in "normal" circumstances you ought to be able to get under 5 repeatably.
you own a classic by any chance
Old 16 May 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #26  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

LOL l'd be adding about a second to any best times acheived by magazines, the technique used for getting the best out of awd cars is:

-Eject any passengers (and possibly go with half a tank of fuel ;-) )
-Wind the car up to maximum revs
-Dump the clutch
-Keep the throttle pinned and stamp on the clutch and just dump it again to engage the next gear
-Possibly call the AA when the gearbox explodes!! :-) I know that Autocar were left stranded late one eve at Bruntingthorpe after killing an EVO's transmission this way!

Ns04
Old 17 May 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #27  
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 27
From: Cheshire
Wink

Originally Posted by Gav-WRX
i can say this was once a quick car and it will be back very soon even quicker
Engine should be back with me early next week... can't wait...
Old 17 May 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #28  
hades's Avatar
hades
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
From: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by bob r
you own a classic by any chance
No, I own a new age. What has that got to do with anything?

It shouldn't take much in the way of brainpower to suggest a 310bhp classic JDM STi - weighing about 200kg less than a new age STi PPP, and with a touch more bhp and probably very similar traction etc - is likely to be a touch faster 0-60.

If you have an issue with my comment that "most people would be a bit slower on a good run" than the prodrive figures of 4.8 (WRX PPP) and 4.6 (WRX PPP), please point me at any properly controlled test (i.e. not hearsay/ measured off the speedo with a stopwatch) where those figures have been beaten.

If you have an issue with my suggestion that 1470kg is heavy, then you need educating in what makes a real sports car!
Old 18 May 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #29  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

i managed 4.43 with 285bhp in a blobeye WRX.

and yes STIs are near 100kgs heavier than the WRX...
Old 18 May 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #30  
CRX-Ownage's Avatar
CRX-Ownage
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by New_scooby_04
LOL l'd be adding about a second to any best times acheived by magazines, the technique used for getting the best out of awd cars is:

-Eject any passengers (and possibly go with half a tank of fuel ;-) )
-Wind the car up to maximum revs
-Dump the clutch
-Keep the throttle pinned and stamp on the clutch and just dump it again to engage the next gear
-Possibly call the AA when the gearbox explodes!! :-) I know that Autocar were left stranded late one eve at Bruntingthorpe after killing an EVO's transmission this way!

Ns04
LMFAO!!! Now that actually made me laugh hehe.. Why not just get a £600 clutch and lightened flywheel and tip tronic gearbox?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 12:59 PM
PetrolHeadKid
Driving Dynamics
10
05 October 2015 06:19 PM
supshon
General Technical
2
03 October 2015 09:06 PM
M4RKG
General Technical
3
30 September 2015 08:51 PM
alex_00s
Drivetrain
2
26 September 2015 07:07 PM



Quick Reply: wrx 280bhp sub 5 sec 0-60?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.