Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

STI7/8 Diff 0-60 Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 July 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #1  
Cocker's Avatar
Cocker
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 1
From: Essex
Default STI7/8 Diff 0-60 Times

Hi, looking for an STI to buy and on the Subaru website they quote STI 7 as 0-60 in 5.9 secs and STI 8 in 5.3 secs

Is this correct? Why the difference? is the 8 lighter???. I've tested driven a 52 plate 7 and a 55 plate 8 and i do admit the 8 gave seemed to give me a more harsher shove in the back
Old 23 July 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #2  
wrc350's Avatar
wrc350
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cocker
Hi, looking for an STI to buy and on the Subaru website they quote STI 7 as 0-60 in 5.9 secs and STI 8 in 5.3 secs

Is this correct? Why the difference? is the 8 lighter???. I've tested driven a 52 plate 7 and a 55 plate 8 and i do admit the 8 gave seemed to give me a more harsher shove in the back
take it you are on about uk as times seem a bit slow for jdm, if thats the case someone will put you right soon
Old 23 July 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #3  
marmski's Avatar
marmski
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Default

bla - this post was incorrect (thanks Top gear!! )

Last edited by marmski; 23 July 2006 at 06:13 PM.
Old 23 July 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #4  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by marmski
I believe the reason for this is down to the increased torque developed by the STi 8 engine over the STi 7.

STi 7 = 261BHP/215lbs.ft
STi 8 = 261BHP/253lbs.ft

The 8 is also heavier @ 1470KG vs 1385KG
Its the same engine
Both produce similar levels of power but the ecu is different and possible tweaks to the map would improve things somewhat
Should also add that both weigh the same, 1470kg, the 02/03 type uk's run similar power/torque levels.

Tony

Last edited by TonyBurns; 23 July 2006 at 03:50 PM.
Old 23 July 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #5  
Dave_68's Avatar
Dave_68
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: Scoobyless..In fact carless :(
Default

No idea, but hi from another Harlow owner
Old 23 July 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #6  
wrc350's Avatar
wrc350
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

or did the 8 have ppp?
Old 23 July 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
RS Grant's Avatar
RS Grant
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 0
From: North East Riviera
Default

Never realised there was such a difference in torque between a stock STi Type UK 7 and 8...


Cheers,
Grant
Old 23 July 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #8  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by RS Grant
Never realised there was such a difference in torque between a stock STi Type UK 7 and 8...


Cheers,
Grant
There aint a classic turbo pushes out that much torque, a type UK 02 STi pushes out 250+lbs.

Tony
Old 23 July 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #9  
RS Grant's Avatar
RS Grant
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 0
From: North East Riviera
Default

Was a wee bit shocked by those figures and was contemplating phoning a V7 driving friend and mocking his puny torque figure and telling him that my MY99 PPP which cost half what his did has a higher lb/ft output!!

Thankyou for saving me from eating the slice of humble pie....


Cheers,
Grant
Old 23 July 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #10  
marmski's Avatar
marmski
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Default

From Top Gear website:

2002 Subaru Impreza 2.0 WRX STi Saloon 4d 1994cc
Cubic capacity (CCs) 1994
Brake horse power (BHP) 261
Number of Cylinders 4
Camshaft DOHC
Number of valves 34
Fuel Type Petrol
Fuel aspiration Turbocharged
Fuel catalyst C
Fuel delivery Multi-Point Injection
Driven wheels Four Wheel Drive
Number of gears 6 Speed
Transmission type Manual
Max torque (lb ft) 215.0
Max torque (NM) 292
Max torque RPM 3600
Tank capacity (litres) 60

2003 Subaru Impreza 2.0 WRX STi Type UK Saloon 4d 1994cc
Cubic capacity (CCs) 1994
Brake horse power (BHP) 261
Number of Cylinders 4
Camshaft DOHC
Number of valves 34
Fuel Type Petrol
Fuel aspiration Turbocharged
Fuel catalyst C
Fuel delivery Multi-Point Injection
Driven wheels Four Wheel Drive
Number of gears 6 Speed
Transmission type Manual
Max torque (lb ft) 253.0
Max torque (NM) 343
Max torque RPM 4000
Tank capacity (litres) 60

but Parkers seems to say different...

http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/sp...d=850&id=22465
vs
http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/sp...d=850&id=24719

Im guessing Parkers is right then and i got my info from a clearly un-reliable source. Sorry.
Old 23 July 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #11  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Marmski,
I think those guys were on top gear rather than from top gear

Tony
Old 23 July 2006 | 06:41 PM
  #12  
ru''s Avatar
ru'
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
From: Brighton no more
Default

Originally Posted by marmski
...Number of valves 34
....
I got to that bit and stopped reading...
Old 23 July 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #13  
Cocker's Avatar
Cocker
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 1
From: Essex
Default

So we still have no real answer then?

Both cars are standard (no PPP). Based on my experience then i will be definatly going for the blobeye!!!
Old 24 July 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #14  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Its the same engine
Both produce similar levels of power but the ecu is different and possible tweaks to the map would improve things somewhat
Should also add that both weigh the same, 1470kg, the 02/03 type uk's run similar power/torque levels.

Tony
Dont know what you dont fathom from that? both produce 265ps and produce approx 254lbs of torque.

Tony
Old 24 July 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #15  
Butty's Avatar
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 1
From: MY06 STi Spec D
Default

Methinks they've muddled up the torque from a WRX

Nick
Old 24 July 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #16  
MikeWood's Avatar
MikeWood
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Solihull
Default

Looks like TG have the figures wrong, 02-05MY STi are basically identical engine-wise and the figures are all the same.

Mike
Old 24 July 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #17  
Criss's Avatar
Criss
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Ibiza
Default

Originally Posted by ru'
I got to that bit and stopped reading...
Me too 34

I thought they only had 16 or maybe 24

How many does a classic have then?!
Old 24 July 2006 | 10:21 PM
  #18  
ru''s Avatar
ru'
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
From: Brighton no more
Default

Classics only have 2.371 in total, but apparently they're lighter so much much faster...


Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darrell@Scoobyworx
Trader Announcements
26
30 January 2024 02:27 PM
Shaun
Other Marques
33
26 October 2015 11:57 AM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 03:17 PM
legb4rsk
Non Scooby Related
14
01 October 2015 06:18 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 AM.